Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:

Nobody talking about the Bobby Trees 3x DNP

 

That injury report reminded me that Bobby Trees is still in the league and playing for the Texans, so there's that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea just cos of volume. You could plough anyone into the line a ton of times for 4 ypc.

So your contention is that the Texans giving him a lot of carries...means he's not very valuable to them

 

got it

 

 

Posted

I watched a lot of the Chiefs/Texans replay last night.  The Texans hung w/ them really well - it really hurt when they lost Dell.

 

They can compete.  The match-up of their pass rushers against KC's tackles is their big advantage.  If they get a couple of breaks, it could happen  - obviously not likely, but it's not as lopsided as the narrative is.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GoBills808 said:

So your contention is that the Texans giving him a lot of carries...means he's not very valuable to them

 

got it

 

Oh I think they value him. They think he is important. I don't think he matters much. Volume running backs who plough into the line for paltry ypc numbers don't make much difference to wins or losses, even by running back standards.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GunnerBill said:

Where they had luck this year was the Broncos FG block, that is a 1 in every 50 play, the Raiders botched snap when in FG range, and Likely's toe v Baltimore week 1. I do think they have had the break of the ball a time or two.

You can add the pass interference call against the Bengals on 4th and long that bailed them out and a week later, the no call for pass interference in the endzone that should have put the Falcons on the 1 yard line late in the 4th. They’ve had a year of good fortune and bounces, hopefully it’s over in these playoffs.

Posted
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea just cos of volume. You could plough anyone into the line a ton of times for 4 ypc.

That's called the Najee Harris effect. 

 

As a runner Mixon is painfully average between the 20s. As a matter of fact I personally think Dameon Pierce is a better runner. But he has a nose for the end zone, is good out of the backfield and is a decent pass blocker. He also fires the team up and adds playoff/Super Bowl experience...which is all helpful IMO.

Posted
5 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

That's called the Najee Harris effect. 

 

As a runner Mixon is painfully average between the 20s. As a matter of fact I personally think Dameon Pierce is a better runner. But he has a nose for the end zone, is good out of the backfield and is a decent pass blocker. He also fires the team up and adds playoff/Super Bowl experience...which is all helpful IMO.

 

Sure. I am not saying he sucks. I just don't think their chances to win or lose are dependent on him.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Sojourner said:

Looks bad but the reports are they’re expecting both Mixon and Al-Shaair to play. 
 

There’s still a chance!!!

 

Any word on Bobby Trees?

Posted
32 minutes ago, Success said:

I watched a lot of the Chiefs/Texans replay last night.  The Texans hung w/ them really well - it really hurt when they lost Dell.

 

They can compete.  The match-up of their pass rushers against KC's tackles is their big advantage.  If they get a couple of breaks, it could happen  - obviously not likely, but it's not as lopsided as the narrative is.

 


Stroud is the biggest question mark. Which dude is going to show up. 
 

Their defensive line, like ours, will be the absolute catalyst behind the majority of the success this weekend. If they can get to Mahomes early and often they stand a good shout providing CJ doesn’t turn into the week 17 against the Ravens version of himself. 🤞

 

It’s tough man, part of me wants to face KC if we win as the narrative is always we haven’t been able to beat them; which is true. The other side of things is they’re theoretically a better match up and we could get some redemption for earlier in the year and that WC when Watson was playing. 
 

 

4 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Any word on Bobby Trees?


Maybe he fell down in a deserted forest…

 

 


On a serious note, they need him. His volume went way up when Dell was done for the year. I saw a report earlier that there’s rumblings he will play?

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TheBrownBear said:

No.  I'm referring specifically to the playoffs as "this time of year" clearly infers.  Rice was out all season and they pivoted to Hopkins  I'd say that's a wash at worse. 


Wash at worst? Rice was on pace for 1600 yds, and he’s much more explosive. 
 

But I do think Hopkins is going to have a big role in the postseason.

Posted

Texans D needs to bring the wood and create multiple turnovers plus 2 at least if not Mixon playing or not won't matter imo

Posted
6 minutes ago, Governor said:

Stroud still looks really slow and confused in the pocket. I see 8 sacks coming.

KC has been off for nearly 3 weeks but you may be on to something.

Posted
3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea just cos of volume. You could plough anyone into the line a ton of times for 4 ypc.

Mixon is really good, as per the eyeball test. Put him on Philly, and he’s averaging 5+ yards a carry. He’s never played behind a good line.

Posted
54 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Mixon is really good, as per the eyeball test. Put him on Philly, and he’s averaging 5+ yards a carry. He’s never played behind a good line.

Mixon is good. He adds the kind of physicality a lot of backs lack. Houston (like Bengals before them) goes to him for hard yards and he typically obliges

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...