Sweats Posted January 17 Posted January 17 14 hours ago, Augie said: Do you think Ernie Adams took a retirement gig? I hope you were sitting on @Sweats’s bed. No big deal there. You son of a *****.........however, you're not wrong 1 Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted January 17 Posted January 17 22 minutes ago, NewEra said: And the only reason you feel this way is because we always have the 2 seed. If we had the 1 seed every year, you’d love this current system. If we were the 4 seed every year, you’d feel like we’d getting punished because we play the same amount of games as the 7 seed. The system is fine. Win more Lol winning 13-14 games gets treated the same as a 9 win team. It's a joke Like already stated it was fine before. 17 minutes ago, H2o said: The system was fine before they added another WC team and took the bye away from the #2. They will always do what can generate more $$$. Ppl say oh you only care because you have Josh Allen and are a super bowl contender. Umm.... Yeah duh.. Why is it easier for Brady and not Allen. It's complete bs Quote
Philly McButterpants Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Mixon just never ceases to screw the Bills 🙄 1 Quote
Chaos Posted January 17 Posted January 17 18 hours ago, Logic said: Of course. I get that the 1 seed always faces the lowest remaining seed, but it would be nice if the Chiefs had to face at least a LITTLE bit of a challenge this weekend. Oh well. Texans are the fourth seed. There is no system where 1 does not play 4 and two does not play 3 when the top four all make it to the semi-finals. The absurity is the sole bye. 2 Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Sounds like Mixon is trending to play. Which would help the chance of an upset by the Texans IMO. Not saying they will buy it helps. My best case scenario: Mixon plays amd leads the Texans to the upset win, but tweaks the ankle and is out vs the Bills (if we beat Baltimore). I wouldn't complain. 2 Quote
NewEra Posted January 17 Posted January 17 3 hours ago, H2o said: The system was fine before they added another WC team and took the bye away from the #2. They will always do what can generate more $$$. It was fine- but they wanted an additional playoff team. So this is the only option. Adding another playoff team in order to “not punish” the #2 seed is lame 1 2 Quote
ALLEN1QB Posted January 17 Posted January 17 If KC makes it again I will become the biggest Detroit or Philly fan! 1 Quote
benderbender Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Mixon can't be disrespected by Ticketmaster this year Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted January 17 Posted January 17 On 1/16/2025 at 10:49 AM, Shaw66 said: The number 1 seed is a huge advantage in this tournament. I liked it better with byes for the top 2. It meant that often both teams in the final game had had the benefit of the bye. With one bye, it means the number 2 team has to go through a serious gauntlet just to get to the championship game, and face a team that had gotten a week off. I've absolutely hated this "1 seed only" bye week. And on top of this, lately media have said how un- competitive the 7 seeds have been over the years. It's time to go back to 6 playoff teams. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.