klos63 Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Just now, streetkings01 said: No….he was trying to throw it away to avoid the lost yardage on the sack obviously 🙄 He threw it 3 feet in front, into the ground to avoid a sack, and he did it intentionally, which is grounding. Quote
I'mBuff Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Just now, TFBillsfan said: Wow guy gets thrown into the punter! NFL strikes again Quote
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM If the goal is to prevent the QB from throwing the ball away to avoid a sack, Intentional grounding is a penalty that needs to be called more subjectively to the spirit of the rule rather than to the letter. There can’t really be a receiver in the area of a ball flicked to the ground. 3 1 Quote
Breakout Squad Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Just now, NoSaint said: That wasn’t the consideration at all the issue is grounding isn’t a reviewable penalty so they couldn’t go back and throw the flag after it was swapped from fumble to pass I think they could’ve called intentional grounding after they changed the ruling. They even mentioned it on the broadcast. Quote
Sojourner Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Posted yesterday at 02:07 AM Heck of a play by Witherspoon Quote
streetkings01 Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Just now, klos63 said: He threw it 3 feet in front, into the ground to avoid a sack, and he did it intentionally, which is grounding. Ok Quote
I'mBuff Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Just now, klos63 said: He threw it 3 feet in front, into the ground to avoid a sack, and he did it intentionally, which is grounding. Of course he was, but 17 was in the area, they don’t get to judge intent, by rule not a penalty. 2 1 Quote
Pre1236 Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Darnold is costing himself millions of $$$ 2 Quote
saundena Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Rams hosed again by the refs. The guy was thrown into the punter! 1 Quote
Sojourner Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Just now, TFBillsfan said: Darnold seeing ghosts! Jetsmas Past, Present or Future? All? Quote
Low Positive Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM That’s the Darnold we all know and love. Vikings wanna sign Zach Wilson next? 1 Quote
HOUSE Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Author Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM That a way Sam, the Jets need you back 1 Quote
Toledo Bill Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Darnold has turned into a head case... terrible! Quote
Casey D Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Darnold has turned back into Darnold. Kinda sad. 1 Quote
Buffalo03 Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM If the Rams got to the Super Bowl, it wouldn't surprise me. I think they can beat Philly and can get Detroit on the right day 3 Quote
Sojourner Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Just now, saundena said: Rams hosed again by the refs. The guy was thrown into the punter! Evened itself out. They got the interception. Just as the Vikes got the ball on that fumble/incomplete pass. Quote
stuvian Posted yesterday at 02:10 AM Posted yesterday at 02:10 AM Vikings plays are too slow to develop Quote
NoSaint Posted yesterday at 02:10 AM Posted yesterday at 02:10 AM (edited) 3 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said: I think they could’ve called intentional grounding after they changed the ruling. They even mentioned it on the broadcast. no they said the opposite you can pick up a grounding flag, but you can’t award it. Edited yesterday at 02:11 AM by NoSaint Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.