Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, T.E. said:

Unbelievable that they didn't give him an intentional grounding there. What a joke.

Stafford has been given the veteran Brady like treatment since he put a LA uniform on. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

There was a time in the nfl where that would have been called in the grasp and a sack.  That rule is one of many that just went bye bye with no real explanation

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
10 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said:

Go Vikings. They deserve to be in the divisional round. I’m not complaining about the NFL seeding and divisional winners getting a home game but the Vikings did get raw dogged on this. They should’ve moved the game to Minnesota 😏


The crowd sounds like it’s in minnesota anyway lol

Posted
Just now, Low Positive said:

So if you’re getting sacked, just flick the ball out. 

 

Yeah, just let the ball dribble out of your hand in the weakest wrist flick ever seen and all is good.

Posted
1 minute ago, streetkings01 said:

That was an obvious forward pass….not sure what the issue is?

He was never looking at a receiver, so at the very least it's intentional grounding. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Belicheck nailed on the Manning cast lol...Eli and Peyton thought he was nuts until they overturned the call 😂

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

If Vikes take this 3rd n out, after that TD bring over turned, it might be an even harder momentum swing than if that play stood 

 

IMO. Crowd is rowdy. Enjoy the neutral playoff game after all the neutral college games. Kinda wish there was a way to have a few of these every year. Maybe the middle seeds matchup should be neutral in wildcard each year

Posted
Just now, MikePJ76 said:

There was a time in the nfl where that would have been called in the grasp and a sack.  That rule is one of many that just went bye bye with no real explanation

Every rule change under Goodell has benefitted the offense. It's really annoying.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, streetkings01 said:

That was an obvious forward pass….not sure what the issue is?

Yeah, by rule it could be.  No way he was trying to complete a pass and no way he was trying to get the ball to Nakua. 

If not a fumble, should be grounding. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, DrBob806 said:

He was never looking at a receiver, so at the very least it's intentional grounding. 


but they let it play out as a fumble and you can’t award a grounding penalty via replay so the options were fumble/td, incomplete pass or sack 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...