stuvian Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM (edited) Tuck play 2.0 Edited yesterday at 01:59 AM by stuvian 1 Quote
streetkings01 Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM That was an obvious forward pass….not sure what the issue is? 1 Quote
Dick_Cheney Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Totally forgot Gilmore was on the Vikings. 1 Quote
CircleTheWagons99 Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM NFL makes the rules mean what ever they want. Looking at the floor and just letting go of the ball now classifies as a "pass"...bush league. 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Wow, Rams and Stafford with the horseshoe rammed up their butts Quote
SirAndrew Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM Posted yesterday at 01:59 AM 1 minute ago, T.E. said: Unbelievable that they didn't give him an intentional grounding there. What a joke. Stafford has been given the veteran Brady like treatment since he put a LA uniform on. 1 Quote
MikePJ76 Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM There was a time in the nfl where that would have been called in the grasp and a sack. That rule is one of many that just went bye bye with no real explanation 5 Quote
Beck Water Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Just now, streetkings01 said: That was an obvious forward pass….not sure what the issue is? Intentional grounding Quote
NoSaint Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM 2 minutes ago, Toledo Bill said: And no intentional grounding? you can’t via replay Quote
LEBills Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM 10 minutes ago, Breakout Squad said: Go Vikings. They deserve to be in the divisional round. I’m not complaining about the NFL seeding and divisional winners getting a home game but the Vikings did get raw dogged on this. They should’ve moved the game to Minnesota 😏 The crowd sounds like it’s in minnesota anyway lol Quote
Einstein Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Just now, Low Positive said: So if you’re getting sacked, just flick the ball out. Yeah, just let the ball dribble out of your hand in the weakest wrist flick ever seen and all is good. Quote
DrBob806 Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM 1 minute ago, streetkings01 said: That was an obvious forward pass….not sure what the issue is? He was never looking at a receiver, so at the very least it's intentional grounding. 1 1 Quote
streetkings01 Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Just now, Beck Water said: Intentional grounding The ball almost hit Puka how the heck could that be intentional grounding? Quote
716 Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Belicheck nailed on the Manning cast lol...Eli and Peyton thought he was nuts until they overturned the call 😂 1 Quote
BillsShredder83 Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM If Vikes take this 3rd n out, after that TD bring over turned, it might be an even harder momentum swing than if that play stood IMO. Crowd is rowdy. Enjoy the neutral playoff game after all the neutral college games. Kinda wish there was a way to have a few of these every year. Maybe the middle seeds matchup should be neutral in wildcard each year Quote
DrBob806 Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Posted yesterday at 02:01 AM Just now, MikePJ76 said: There was a time in the nfl where that would have been called in the grasp and a sack. That rule is one of many that just went bye bye with no real explanation Every rule change under Goodell has benefitted the offense. It's really annoying. 2 Quote
streetkings01 Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Just now, DrBob806 said: He was never looking at a receiver, so at the very least it's intentional grounding. It almost hit Puka….what the heck were you guys watching? 1 1 Quote
klos63 Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Just now, streetkings01 said: That was an obvious forward pass….not sure what the issue is? Yeah, by rule it could be. No way he was trying to complete a pass and no way he was trying to get the ball to Nakua. If not a fumble, should be grounding. 1 Quote
oldmanfan Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM I give up. Between that “pass” and that “unnecessary roughness” call it is clear I no longer have any idea what the rules are for pro football. Quote
NoSaint Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Just now, DrBob806 said: He was never looking at a receiver, so at the very least it's intentional grounding. but they let it play out as a fumble and you can’t award a grounding penalty via replay so the options were fumble/td, incomplete pass or sack 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.