Jump to content

Do Tyreek Hill and Stephen Diggs situations change contracts for non QB playersoving forward?  

119 members have voted

  1. 1. Do teams change contract terms for players going forward to protect themselves

    • Yes
      54
    • No
      65


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Poll - with diggs and hill most notably recently deciding to want to leave mid extension, do we see teams now looking to sign short contracts and protect themselves more?

Edited by Sharky7337
Posted

You know they have to agree to it, right? That’s why they have agents and stuff. You have to compete in the market, not in a vacuum. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, RyanC883 said:

perhaps for WR.  Reminds me of that hilarious commercial for I forget what brand where the diva WR is drafted, celebrates, and falls down the stairs.  

Yeah no more long term deals.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

There will always be stupid teams who sign WRs to crazy deals. A few years ago, nobody would've believed a team would ever give a QB a fully guaranteed contract, and here we are...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Augie said:

You know they have to agree to it, right? That’s why they have agents and stuff. You have to compete in the market, not in a vacuum. 

This is the answer. The market speaks loudly. WR contracts are getting bigger as a total but also as a % of the cap. Teams are moving MORE towards a commitment to the top WRs. I know some people desire “the good ol’ days when players did what they are told.” That’s not sports in 2025. The power lies with the players. 

3 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Stefon's nerdy alter ego

 

urkel%20urquelle_0.jpg

nba playoffs cj mccollum GIF by Bleacher Report

Posted (edited)

He used my favorite excuse, "I have to take care of my family."

I am sure they won't starve but maybe the Lamborghini is using to much gas.

 

.

Edited by HOUSE
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

Diggs's situation is that he is injured on IR....

And likely wont be back for next year for the full year and probably not overly effective for the rest of it as he gets back... I see him as an OBJ now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

I'm thinking wr will be treated like rb's. Drafted every year cut when the rookie contract is up. 

Based on what? The data suggests that WR contracts and % of cap are higher now than at any point in history. The data says the exact opposite of what you posted. That is all true even before Chase signs his new deal that will certainly be historic. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, JP51 said:

And likely wont be back for next year for the full year and probably not overly effective for the rest of it as he gets back... I see him as an OBJ now.

 

what's that got to do with the OP's topic?

 

Players get injured.  Not something for factoring  into contract length--unless the player has a significant history and is near end of career..

Posted

Really interesting how some of these guys have no loyalty whatsoever to organizations who give them insane money and do everything in their power to make them successful on the field.

 

Miami gave Hill $105 MM guaranteed, and he feels no shame at all about causing problems during an off year.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...