Alaska Darin Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Break into the Dems file cabinets. Invade Europe. File Cabinets. Europe. Sorry, just can't put that one together. 368681[/snapback] Aw, c'mon. So 27,000,000+ Russians lost their lives in WWII. Nixon's buddies broke into FILE CABINETS.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Break into the Dems file cabinets. Invade Europe. File Cabinets. Europe. Sorry, just can't put that one together. 368681[/snapback] I understood it. But then, I haven't taken my meds yet today, either. Guess it's a sign I should...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Aw, c'mon. So 27,000,000+ Russians lost their lives in WWII. Nixon's buddies broke into FILE CABINETS. 368685[/snapback] From the people who brought you: "We'll take another 9/11 or worse because playing loud Christina Aguilara music and seeing what bomb making books the illegal Saudi guy checked out of the library are very, very bad things." "And then, we'll blame it all on the Bush gang, because hey - it's their job to counter terror while everyone gets to do exactly as they please and demand things be a certain way when we have no idea on earth what we are talking about".
Reuben Gant Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 And if it weren't for World War I and World War II, Germany had a pretty good century. 368666[/snapback] Note to self: never use this stock joke Monday mornings.
Ghost of BiB Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Note to self: never use this stock joke Monday mornings. 368704[/snapback] Especially before lunch.
EC-Bills Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Especially before lunch. 368712[/snapback] Speaking of lunch, isn't it your turn to buy today?
Ghost of BiB Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Speaking of lunch, isn't it your turn to buy today? 368717[/snapback] Is your name Lynn?
EC-Bills Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Is your name Lynn? 368725[/snapback] Actually my middle name is Lynn...
VABills Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Speaking of lunch, isn't it your turn to buy today? 368717[/snapback] He owes me lunch first.
Ghost of BiB Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 He owes me lunch first. 368743[/snapback] We'll get it done. I'm going to be spending a lot more time downtown. Maybe I should bring a friend?
KnightRider Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 (edited) Best: James Polk- He kept his campaign promises regarding Manifest Destiny by accepting Texas (actually happened he took office) into the union, and expanded the country to the west coast by negotiation with the Brits for Oregon and by war with Mexico to gain the southwest. He did all of that in one term and got the heck out of there. Lincoln- Eliminating slavery was a truly noble cause, and it is a shame the founding fathers weren't able to come up with some way of phasing it out. He had the fortitude to do what they failed to do. Truman (and Reagan, for that matter)- He did what was necessary to end the war, and saved lives in doing it. Worst: Wilson, for the income tax. FDR, for Social Security and the rest of the Raw Deal. Also for being so close to the Rosenbergs. LBJ- for not pulling out of Vietnam, a country with zero strategic value, Welfare, Medicare, etc... Clinton- A modern day Rosenberg. Lincoln- who did more to centralize government than Wilson and FDR combined. Edited June 27, 2005 by KnightRider
Gavin in Va Beach Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Best: Teddy R. Reagan GW Bush* Worst: Frankie R. Reagan Clinton* Edit:Carter - CaWingNut has sold me. *Ramifications of their policies still have yet to be fully felt/understood, but my guess is 100 years from now my predictions will stand up
OnTheRocks Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Worst: William Henry Harrison/Jimmy Carter Best: George Washington/Teddy Roosevelt
Bill from NYC Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Not wanting to bring a premature end to your woody for Reagan, but let's try to be a little more realistic about a few things. There were not jobs galore once Reagan took over. That took time. Same with interest rates. If the economy hadn't started to perk up towards the middle to end of his first term, he could have very well been a one termer. 368608[/snapback] Yes, my choice of words did imply that the economic recovery was instant. You are right, it did take a couple of years. What are your views as to the presidencies of Reagan and Carter?
PastaJoe Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Best: Teddy R. Reagan GW Bush* Worst: Frankie R. Reagan Clinton* *Ramifications of their policies still have yet to be fully felt/understood, but my guess is 100 years from now my predictions will stand up 368798[/snapback] I'd take that bet, except without stem cell funding I doubt we'll live that long. But if we do and you're right, I'll buy you a shot and a beer in Mecca with money from my personal savings account. If you're wrong, you can buy me a glass of non-toxic water in Reaganville, C.S.A. (the Christian States of America).
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 I'd take that bet, except without stem cell funding I doubt we'll live that long. But if we do and you're right, I'll buy you a shot and a beer in Mecca with money from my personal savings account. If you're wrong, you can buy me a glass of non-toxic water in Reaganville, C.S.A. (the Christian States of America). 368866[/snapback] By the way, last year the US government spend $500 million dollars on stem cell research. That's more than the rest of the world combined.
Gavin in Va Beach Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 I'd take that bet, except without stem cell funding I doubt we'll live that long. But if we do and you're right, I'll buy you a shot and a beer in Mecca with money from my personal savings account. If you're wrong, you can buy me a glass of non-toxic water in Reaganville, C.S.A. (the Christian States of America). 368866[/snapback] Actually, with all Clinton did to aid the Chinese in their quest for technology, I doubt we'll live that long after the invasion, unless we pledge our undying love to Mao and learn to speak Mandarin...but sure, sounds like a bet.
Ghost of BiB Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Actually, with all Clinton did to aid the Chinese in their quest for technology, I doubt we'll live that long after the invasion, unless we pledge our undying love to Mao and learn to speak Mandarin...but sure, sounds like a bet. 368879[/snapback] They speak cantonese in the south. They are going to get us in the pocketbook, anyway.
/dev/null Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 And if it weren't for World War I and World War II, Germany had a pretty good century. 368666[/snapback] Nazi's Nixon Bad! Watergate! Vietnam! Comparing something to Nazis/Soviets is a sure sign of a weak argument.
Reuben Gant Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Nazi's Nixon Bad! Watergate! Vietnam! Comparing something to Nazis/Soviets is a sure sign of a weak argument. 368881[/snapback] oh god. You do realize that Germany lost two wars, don' t you? the expression I thought, was somewhat common, used in situations when great exceptions are made.
Recommended Posts