Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Best

 

Lincoln- Guided the country through it's darkest time. Ended slavery as well.

 

FDR- While some of his methods border on socialism, he got the job done with a little help from WWII and left the country in better shape than he found it when he got there.

Posted

Worst: President Woodrow Wilson - Two term President of the USA. He passed the Federal Reserve Act. Wilson chose to introduce the act in 1913 (first year of his administration) although major tariff legislation was also pending. If you don't knwo what the Act did to us, Google and find out. It was the beginning of the end for this country and the source of our National Debt.

Posted
Worst: President Woodrow Wilson - Two term President of the USA. He passed  the Federal Reserve Act. Wilson chose to introduce the act in 1913 (first year of his administration) although major tariff legislation was also pending.  If you don't knwo what the Act did to us, Google and find out.  It was the beginning of the end for this country and the source of our National Debt.

368036[/snapback]

 

he also called a special session of congress after ratification of the 16th amendment to implement a federal income tax :ph34r:

Posted
Worst: President Woodrow Wilson - Two term President of the USA. He passed  the Federal Reserve Act. Wilson chose to introduce the act in 1913 (first year of his administration) although major tariff legislation was also pending.  If you don't knwo what the Act did to us, Google and find out.  It was the beginning of the end for this country and the source of our National Debt.

368036[/snapback]

Excellent choice.

Posted
Best: Thomas Jefferson

 

Worst: Bush Jr, in a land-slide!

368072[/snapback]

 

Why Bush? Shouldn't there be some requirement to judge by history? Same reason I won't say Clinton. The effects of a presidency may not be seen for several years. Old Dubya might just end up with a better record than many might think.

Posted
Why Bush? Shouldn't there be some requirement to judge by history? Same reason I won't say Clinton. The effects of a presidency may not be seen for several years. Old Dubya might just end up with a better record than many might think.

368182[/snapback]

They'll just refuse to acknowledge it.

 

Best - George W.......Washington, that is.

 

Worst - Probably Grant, although Jimmy Carter is the most embarrassing.

Posted
Why Bush? Shouldn't there be some requirement to judge by history? Same reason I won't say Clinton. The effects of a presidency may not be seen for several years. Old Dubya might just end up with a better record than many might think.

368182[/snapback]

 

Anybody who says Clinton or W is very short sighted and extremely spiteful. You can't judge a president untill they are out of office many years. The true results of most policies aren't even seen until 6, 7, 8 years after they take effect.

 

I have no doubt both Clinton and W will rank in the middle somewhere when it is all said and done, but that can't yet be judged.

Posted
After giving it much thought, I agree with this one.  With Carter getting an honorable mention.

368223[/snapback]

 

You gave it thought? I just hurried up and typed before my hotpocket dinged.

×
×
  • Create New...