Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think Shavers should be put on the 53

 

he’s taller than Allen, has worked hard players love him

 

showed a real speed gear on his TD run

 

He could be an “X factor” to some degree

 

Samuel has battled turf toe all season. Now has a rib injury. IR him at this point? 

Posted
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

Sweet.  We can call up Hyde four times.

Not sure if you are serious but I dont see that happening since they have not called him up during the final three to get some reps.  Seems like he is there for leadership and coaching.

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Gore and clapp.  It’s a no brainer.  Entire starting OL sits.  That’s the engine of this team.  

And if Trubisky goes down you play Gore at QB?   I see Mike White as one of the two callups. and  see either Torrence or Edwards playing a big chunk.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

I think Shavers should be put on the 53

 

he’s taller than Allen, has worked hard players love him

 

showed a real speed gear on his TD run

 

He could be an “X factor” to some degree

 

Samuel has battled turf toe all season. Now has a rib injury. IR him at this point? 

Who do you waive?  That is great that he works hard but no way you let one of Shakir, Hollins, Cooper, Coleman or Samuel go.  Not sure about Samuel to be honest...if his turf toe is lingering you could IR him I guess.   Anyway, Shavers does not have speed, he ran a 4.59 forty and he is not an X factor.  He made a good play in the fourth quarter against a defense that quit, lets not blow it out of proportion.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said:

Who do you waive?  That is great that he works hard but no way you let one of Shakir, Hollins, Cooper, Coleman or Samuel go.  Not sure about Samuel to be honest...if his turf toe is lingering you could IR him I guess.   Anyway, Shavers does not have speed, he ran a 4.59 forty and he is not an X factor.  He made a good play in the fourth quarter against a defense that quit, lets not blow it out of proportion.

Shavers showed speed last week.  He was pulling away from defenders 

Posted
59 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said:

Who do you waive?  That is great that he works hard but no way you let one of Shakir, Hollins, Cooper, Coleman or Samuel go.  Not sure about Samuel to be honest...if his turf toe is lingering you could IR him I guess.   Anyway, Shavers does not have speed, he ran a 4.59 forty and he is not an X factor.  He made a good play in the fourth quarter against a defense that quit, lets not blow it out of proportion.


Samuel to IR? He has turf toe and now a rib injury

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Matt_In_NH said:

looks can be deceiving

Slow WRs dont score 69 yard TDs from the line of scrimmage.  There is track speed and then there is football speed.

Edited by Pete
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Matt_In_NH said:

Not sure if you are serious but I dont see that happening since they have not called him up during the final three to get some reps.  Seems like he is there for leadership and coaching.

And if Trubisky goes down you play Gore at QB?   I see Mike White as one of the two callups. and  see either Torrence or Edwards playing a big chunk.

Sure.  Gore at QB.  Wildcat.  Whatever.  The starting five don’t see the field,  Allen takes one snap out of shotgun and either hands the ball to cook or throws it in the general vicinity of Samuel and the rest of the game is inside zone, power,  duo and get it over with. 

Edited by SectionC3
Posted
47 minutes ago, Pete said:

Slow WRs dont score 69 yard TDs from the line of scrimmage.  There is track speed and then there is football speed.

Ok he’s super fast, except he’s not.  Angles and blocking can make a play look a certain way.  I know you will keep pounding that square peg so no need to respond. Let’s just disagree. 

49 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Sure.  Gore at QB.  Wildcat.  Whatever.  The starting five don’t see the field,  Allen takes one snap out of shotgun and either hands the ball to cook or throws it in the general vicinity of Samuel and the rest of the game is inside zone, power,  duo and get it over with. 

Except that is not going to happen.  You have 53 plus 2 from the practice squad to play the whole game.  This is not a preseason game with a ninety man roster. Some starters will play and many key backups will play a lot. Even if you call up clapp.  One injury and what do you do put gore at OT?

Posted
1 hour ago, Matt_In_NH said:

Ok he’s super fast, except he’s not.  Angles and blocking can make a play look a certain way.  I know you will keep pounding that square peg so no need to respond. Let’s just disagree. 

Except that is not going to happen.  You have 53 plus 2 from the practice squad to play the whole game.  This is not a preseason game with a ninety man roster. Some starters will play and many key backups will play a lot. Even if you call up clapp.  One injury and what do you do put gore at OT?

Play the starter.  This isn’t that hard.  I’d rather have an injury to a backup than to a starter.  Offensive line is the engine of this team.  Clapp + four backups allows you to play the second unit in its entirety.  Yes, some rotational players - epenesa, for instance — likely will have to play some.  But there’s no reason to not dress Clapp for Mike friggin White in a game where the priority is to not get hurt. 

Posted
4 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Play the starter.  This isn’t that hard.  I’d rather have an injury to a backup than to a starter.  Offensive line is the engine of this team.  Clapp + four backups allows you to play the second unit in its entirety.  Yes, some rotational players - epenesa, for instance — likely will have to play some.  But there’s no reason to not dress Clapp for Mike friggin White in a game where the priority is to not get hurt. 

The discussion is about shavers on the 53 as an “X factor” not Who to play this week. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said:

looks can be deceiving

He ran in the 4.3's coming out of high school.  I saw that 40 time coming out of college and wasn't sure what to believe.  But he was not deceptively fast on that TD.  He was actually fast.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, bearstobills said:

He ran in the 4.3's coming out of high school.  I saw that 40 time coming out of college and wasn't sure what to believe.  But he was not deceptively fast on that TD.  He was actually fast.

The pro scouts get a more accurate answer.  He ran a 4.59 at his pro day.  What some random coach measures in a random high school is not the same.  Lots of guys are taller til they get to the combine too.   Unless he had an injury or something in which case his agent did him a great disservice.  

Edited by Matt_In_NH

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...