Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just confirms what many already knew. The American nation is a dead letter. My critiques of Trump are entirely vindicated. The Q-tards who fled the board and the libtards who remain all hate me because I tell the truth. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Great news!  Good start.  You've been played MAGAs...

 

 

Writes it over and over,

 

in thread after thread.

 

Proves that he does not understand much, just projects his longings.

 

People are against illegal immigration.

 

 

1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

 

Still counting on prediction articles to try and justify his weak positions.

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Writes it over and over,

 

in thread after thread.

 

Proves that he does not understand much, just projects his longings.

 

People are against illegal immigration.

 

Really?  Why so many of your blogger heroes against this?  Ask Levi....

Posted
1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Here you go.

 

e9a8cd9d-93c2-48ae-87b7-c7e2aba39e76-536

Dude, if my butthurts after tomorrow it will be from sunburn.  I didn't vote for a guy pretending to be against immigrants who actually sees them as vital.  We agree on something!  But he won the votes of lots of people he wouldn't let in if they were foreigners.  So revel in that.

Posted

 

 

I want to explain how political coalitions work.

Political coalitions happen when people who may disagree

on many things work together to achieve the things they

DO agree on, because those issues they agree on are more

important than what divides them.

 

This concept is what defines parliamentary systems,

but it also defines the U.S. two-party system because it relates

to swaying “independent” voters to one party or the other.

Importantly, once a coalition achieves power, it must stay

together or it can never succeed in the core missions that

brought it together in the first place.

 

I’ll illustrate. Suppose there is a country with a two-party system,

and its president gets elected because he pulls together a

disparate coalition that is united by the idea that it should be

illegal to put ketchup on steak. “Make Steak Great Again!”

was its unifying rallying cry, and as a result 51% of the country’s

voters voted for the No Ketchup candidate.

At the same time, that 51% coalition was also split evenly on the

issue of pineapple on pizza.

 

However, during the election season, everyone in the coalition

silently agreed not to discuss or argue over the pineapple issue

as the ketchup issue was far more important.

After the No Ketchup party wins but before it even takes office,

a few media bomb throwers working for the Yes Ketchup Party

convince the 51% coalition members to bludgeon each other to

death over the pineapple issue, fracturing the coalition along

pineapple lines. As a result, the No Ketchup leader is rendered

completely ineffective because the mandate of his coalition has

vanished, the No Ketchup Party loses the mid-term elections and

suddenly steaks everywhere are smothered in ketchup

and homeless illegal immigrants are running amok in cities,

flashmobbing into downtown restaurants where they pour cheap,

bootleg corn-syrup ketchup willy-nilly on everyone’s steak

and there is nothing that anyone can do about it, because it’s all legal.

All because the 51% could not agree to disagree on the far less

important pineapple pizza issue.

 

That, Charlie Brown, is how political coalitions work.

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

The problem with the “it’s just a debate!” crowd is that nearly every invader votes for more invaders. It’s a “debate” over whether the nation should shoot itself in the head. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I want to explain how political coalitions work.

Political coalitions happen when people who may disagree

on many things work together to achieve the things they

DO agree on, because those issues they agree on are more

important than what divides them.

 

This concept is what defines parliamentary systems,

but it also defines the U.S. two-party system because it relates

to swaying “independent” voters to one party or the other.

Importantly, once a coalition achieves power, it must stay

together or it can never succeed in the core missions that

brought it together in the first place.

 

I’ll illustrate. Suppose there is a country with a two-party system,

and its president gets elected because he pulls together a

disparate coalition that is united by the idea that it should be

illegal to put ketchup on steak. “Make Steak Great Again!”

was its unifying rallying cry, and as a result 51% of the country’s

voters voted for the No Ketchup candidate.

At the same time, that 51% coalition was also split evenly on the

issue of pineapple on pizza.

 

However, during the election season, everyone in the coalition

silently agreed not to discuss or argue over the pineapple issue

as the ketchup issue was far more important.

After the No Ketchup party wins but before it even takes office,

a few media bomb throwers working for the Yes Ketchup Party

convince the 51% coalition members to bludgeon each other to

death over the pineapple issue, fracturing the coalition along

pineapple lines. As a result, the No Ketchup leader is rendered

completely ineffective because the mandate of his coalition has

vanished, the No Ketchup Party loses the mid-term elections and

suddenly steaks everywhere are smothered in ketchup

and homeless illegal immigrants are running amok in cities,

flashmobbing into downtown restaurants where they pour cheap,

bootleg corn-syrup ketchup willy-nilly on everyone’s steak

and there is nothing that anyone can do about it, because it’s all legal.

All because the 51% could not agree to disagree on the far less

important pineapple pizza issue.

 

That, Charlie Brown, is how political coalitions work.

 

 

 

I’m with the no ketchup, medium rare, salt and pepper crowd…what a silly analogy. This is a fundamental rift. It’s racists vs semi decent R’s

Posted
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

I’m with the no ketchup, medium rare, salt and pepper crowd…what a silly analogy. This is a fundamental rift. It’s racists vs semi decent R’s

 

Maybe?

 

If MAGA is about making life better for Mainstreet, it looks and sounds an awful lot like trickle down, supply-side globalism in practice. 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Coffeesforclosers said:

 

Maybe?

 

If MAGA is about making life better for Mainstreet, it looks and sounds an awful lot like trickle down, supply-side globalism in practice. 

 

 

No doubt. Historically, that approach hasn’t benefited the middle, much less the bottom.  But they’ll smile through the disappointment. 

Posted

 

 

 

 

What were the 3 regulations Trump passed on H-1B?

 

During Trump's presidency, three key regulations on H-1B visas were:

 

DOL Wage Rule: Increased minimum wage requirements for H-1B workers.

DHS Specialty Occupation Definition: Tightened the definition of "specialty occupation," making it harder for positions to qualify for H-1B visas.

DHS Employer-Employee Relationship: Limited H-1B visa validity to one year for workers at third-party sites, changing employer-employee relationship

 

 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...