Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When drafted, we all thought he’d be a decent RB but a great pass catcher.

 

Turns out he’s a decent pass catcher, but a great RB. 


No shot we can afford his second contract, but man James Cook is fun. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

When we drafted him I would have been happy if he gave us 80% of prime Dalvin. 100% and counting so far …

Yeah, no. He's got a ways to go to match his brothers production.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

Because I saw how good defenses like the Texans attack us without an outside WR threat and it wasn't pretty.

I love our WRs. I’m not asking for anyone to get hurt that’s a bizarre concept. If you were attempting to discredit the importance of Cook I just wasn’t going to co-sign. The offense runs through 17/4. It has from the minute Brady took over. He is one of the elite difference makers in the league. Normally I’d say RBs are a dime a dozen (we do have 3 good ones) But this offense runs through the RBs. And Cook is a big time playmaker. I wouldn’t want to lose him for a second.

Edited by Brianmoorman4jesus
Posted

Maybe it depends on the offense system as well. Brady is from Sean Peyton’s offensive tree and Cook is exactly the kind of back fitting into that offensive philosophy. Mind you Ty and Ray are too. But Dorsey and even Daboll may be more WR centered. Heck Daboll found Barkley is not worth keeping. 

Posted
17 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

The people who hate on Cook do so because they still prefer bigger, more physical backs who can do the 3 yards and a cloud of dust stuff. 

 

Cook is not that kind of player but he is a top 10 back. His vision and short area acceleration are elite.

 

EDIT: to be clear: I'm still not paying a running back while I have Josh Allen. 


GB, I appreciate you sharing as this is the new NFL, and the days of Jérôme Betis are not as common.  Cooks acceleration and shiftiness is a treasure and when we need an anger we have Davis.  We also have explosiveness from Johnson and a solid pass catcher.  I love our RB room.

Posted

After watching the mic’s up, I’m good with paying him 13M aav. Might not be a smart move but giving money to a guy that can take it to the house on any play is the right kind of guy to screw the cap up 4
 

have a feeling he wants to go to the warm weather though. Talking about being cold all game

Posted
22 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

The people who hate on Cook do so because they still prefer bigger, more physical backs who can do the 3 yards and a cloud of dust stuff. 

 

Cook is not that kind of player but he is a top 10 back. His vision and short area acceleration are elite.

 

EDIT: to be clear: I'm still not paying a running back while I have Josh Allen. 


there have been a handful of posters that saw that potential to be a home run every time he touched the ball who I know are unsurprised by this season. 

 

He was a high pick for a back with a solid pedigree- the only shame is he didn’t hit his stride a little sooner. I think maybe a combo of his own issues and probably a bit of the staffs distrust of young/new guys. It would’ve been nice to get another year out of him before he leaves to his next stop.

Posted
6 hours ago, PoundingDog said:

Maybe it depends on the offense system as well. Brady is from Sean Peyton’s offensive tree and Cook is exactly the kind of back fitting into that offensive philosophy. Mind you Ty and Ray are too. But Dorsey and even Daboll may be more WR centered. Heck Daboll found Barkley is not worth keeping. 


and while Peyton drafted bush high… he wasn’t a mega contract vet. Pierre Thomas wasn’t a super well paid guy. Sproles again was toolsy but not an elite rb contract. 
 

it’s the classic I wouldn’t be shocked to see cook leave and a sneaky mid tier vet signed or mid round pick plus the existing backs. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...