Sickening update from SB Nation

[FireChans]

4 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

who knows.  It's not something I would have noticed.

It’s what the topic you are posting in is about.

[Pondslider]

https://web.archive.org/web/20240924131020/https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2018/4/24/17271686/josh-allen-nfl-draft-2018-stats-analysis-comparisons

It had the original headline as recently as September this year and was changed sometime between then and late November. It’s obvious it was changed because it was a smug headline that made them look bad.
 

It’s not just that they were wrong or that they predicted he was a long shot it was that they were dancing on the grave of his career before it even started. 

Edited Friday at 06:29 PM by Pondslider

[Mr. WEO]

2 minutes ago, FireChans said:

It’s what the topic you are posting in is about.

 

you dug this up, for some reason.

 

I really don't know why a guy would go back and change a headline on an article hardly anyone read initially, I bet.

[FireChans]

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

you dug this up, for some reason.

 

I really don't know why a guy would go back and change a headline on an article hardly anyone read initially, I bet.

In WEO land, the headline was no big deal, take wasn't that unpopular at the time so why change it? Of course, begging the question, why did they change in 6 years after the fact.

 

I'm sure if you try hard enough, you can come up with some reason they changed it, especially because they know they changed it for a reason, otherwise it wouldn't be changed at all.

[boyst]

If you simply hate the "media" then it's not nearly enough. 

[Mr. WEO]

7 minutes ago, FireChans said:

In WEO land, the headline was no big deal, take wasn't that unpopular at the time so why change it? Of course, begging the question, why did they change in 6 years after the fact.

 

I'm sure if you try hard enough, you can come up with some reason they changed it, especially because they know they changed it for a reason, otherwise it wouldn't be changed at all.

 

what was the real reason

[FireChans]

Just now, Mr. WEO said:

 

what was the real reason

IMO, probably to hide a bad take.  Josh Allen's MVP videos are probably gonna plaster that headline all over with that author's name.

Edited Friday at 06:45 PM by FireChans

[NewEra]

2 hours ago, FireChans said:

by being an internet bulldog.

 

Here's the proof for anyone interested, courtesy of the internet archive:

 

 

May 2024:

 

 

Today:

 

 

 

That’s great bro.  Love it

[starrymessenger]

I guess that's what you call retrospective analysis.
Fortunately not all talking heads are idiots. I think it was Greenie the other day who said that Josh Allen was the best QB he had ever seen, better than Elway his previous fav. 

[Mr. WEO]

23 minutes ago, FireChans said:

IMO, probably to hide a bad take.  Josh Allen's MVP videos are probably gonna plaster that headline all over with that author's name.

 

I can't imagine anyone else will remember this article, if they knew about it at all---least of all Josh Allen.  There were many such articles about how he would be a stretch at 7.  Are they going to plaster a new title that says he will go in the 1st round anyway?  Or the one where if he succeeds the Bills are geniuses.

 

Wow---zing.

[FireChans]

3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

I can't imagine anyone else will remember this article, if they knew about it at all---least of all Josh Allen.  There were many such articles about how he would be a stretch at 7.  Are they going to plaster a new title that says he will go in the 1st round anyway?  Or the one where if he succeeds the Bills are geniuses.

 

Wow---zing.

And yet, they changed it. lol

[Mr. WEO]

1 minute ago, FireChans said:

And yet, they changed it. lol

 you can forward those all those videos...

[FireChans]

Just now, Mr. WEO said:

 you can forward those all those videos...

It's very on-brand to argue how silly it would be to change the title of article when that title has already been changed lol.

[Chaos]

The entire universe is on board with the idea that Allen was a good pick despite pre-draft reservations.  But we will find a way to make this controversial still. 

[dorquemada]

4 hours ago, chongli said:

Someone here needs to let him know he is a dork (he quit Twitter):

 

Blue Sky

Jason Kirk

@jasonkirk.fyi

 

Lmao he'll fit right in over there

[CSBill]

4 hours ago, FireChans said:

In WEO land, the headline was no big deal, take wasn't that unpopular at the time so why change it? Of course, begging the question, why did they change in 6 years after the fact.

 

I'm sure if you try hard enough, you can come up with some reason they changed it, especially because they know they changed it for a reason, otherwise it wouldn't be changed at all.

 

Has anyone called him on it? And asked why the change. I would be very curious to hear his answer.

[Goin Breakdown]

4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

I can't imagine anyone else will remember this article, if they knew about it at all---least of all Josh Allen.  There were many such articles about how he would be a stretch at 7.  Are they going to plaster a new title that says he will go in the 1st round anyway?  Or the one where if he succeeds the Bills are geniuses.

 

Wow---zing.

Wgr was just taking about it in the last couple weeks and I e heard the whole Josh defying Math often. bills fans know and remember. That's all we need to know about it. With all the crap Josh the Bills received, I'm not surprised people have been collecting receipts. 

[Doc]

3 hours ago, CSBill said:

Has anyone called him on it? And asked why the change. I would be very curious to hear his answer.

 

He left Twitter/X, so apparently he was called on it...

[pigpen65]

You wanna see some stupid ***** just bump his draft thread on this board

[Whkfc]

10 hours ago, FireChans said:

by being an internet bulldog.

 

Here's the proof for anyone interested, courtesy of the internet archive:

 

 

May 2024:

 

 

Today:

 

 

 

Spoiler the Bills did outsmart all regular humans and math itself.