Breakout Squad Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Bring him in if he clears waivers. He will fit in our rotation well. 2 Quote
thronethinker Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Beast said: Honestly, it’s pure BS that a player can be released to join any team at this stage. They have to clear waivers first, so no it’s not that simple. Quote
Utah John Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Wiz said: Baltimore finished after the Bills last season so we would have priority if he were subject to waivers. For the first three weeks of the season, the NFL's waiver wire priority for teams is based on the draft order from that spring's draft. The worst team in the league from the previous season has the first claim The second-worst team has the second claim, and so on Traded or forfeited draft picks are not considered After the third week of the season, the waiver claim priority is based on the league's standings and changes weekly. The order is the reverse of the league standings, with the team with the worst record having the highest priority. So the Ravens would get precedence over the Bills. But keep in mind the Bills beat the Dolphins with Campbell twice this year. He's still a good player and I'd be happy to see him come on board if there's cap money available, but he's not the difference in getting the Lombardi. 1 Quote
gjv Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I've heard Campbell has a strong relationship with Greg Rousseau. Perhaps Greg could sway Calais. 1 1 Quote
MJS Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Beast said: Honestly, it’s pure BS that a player can be released to join any team at this stage. Why? Quote
boyst Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Wiz said: Baltimore finished after the Bills last season so we would have priority if he were subject to waivers. Only in the first 3 weeks. Now it's by record Quote
boyst Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I'm waiting for players to say they'll refuse to play for a team off of waivers. Quote
pennstate10 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Can Beane ask his buddy at the Giants to claim him, and then trade him to the Bills for a conditional 7th? 1 1 Quote
Boatdrinks Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I thought Campbell wasn’t interested in playing in Buffalo weather. 1 Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I’m sure the Jets will claim him off waivers if released 😂 Quote
JohnNord Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Hopefully the Bills are ready to make an offer. It’ll be between us and the Ravens I believe. We need him. Actually the Bills could really use a player like him on the DL. I’m assuming he would take the Justin Jefferson role. I think the rumor was that Miami had a deal in place with Baltimore until McDaniel killed it. It makes me think Baltimore would be his first choice but would definitely take him in Buffalo. Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) We should've signed him 2 years ago instead of waste time with this manacherie of jags He would be an upgrade over some of McD's rotational guys. And he gets a chance at a ring. But yes if he comes available go get him. Edited 2 hours ago by LABILLBACKER Quote
JohnNord Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Utah John said: For the first three weeks of the season, the NFL's waiver wire priority for teams is based on the draft order from that spring's draft. The worst team in the league from the previous season has the first claim The second-worst team has the second claim, and so on Traded or forfeited draft picks are not considered After the third week of the season, the waiver claim priority is based on the league's standings and changes weekly. The order is the reverse of the league standings, with the team with the worst record having the highest priority. So the Ravens would get precedence over the Bills. But keep in mind the Bills beat the Dolphins with Campbell twice this year. He's still a good player and I'd be happy to see him come on board if there's cap money available, but he's not the difference in getting the Lombardi. He would not be subject to waivers as he is a vested veteran with 4+ seasons. He would be a free agent 11 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: I thought Campbell wasn’t interested in playing in Buffalo weather. LOL where did you see that? Baltimore weather isn’t much better 1 Quote
Boatdrinks Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, JohnNord said: He would not be subject to waivers as he is a vested veteran with 4+ seasons. He would be a free agent LOL where did you see that? Baltimore weather isn’t much better I’m not sure , lol. Just thought I had seen that not long ago. Maybe I’m thinking of a different FA the Bills were interested in Quote
Big Turk Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, boyst said: he would be subject to have to go through the waiver wire. No he would not...he is a vested vet with more than 4 years(I think it's 4 years) and those players are not subject to waivers. Edited 2 hours ago by Big Turk 1 1 Quote
HOUSE Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 38 years old?? Haaaa, yeah right Why not Kyle Williams?? Edited 2 hours ago by HOUSE Quote
JohnNord Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, HOUSE said: 38 years old?? Haaaa, yeah right Have you watched him this season? He’s playing great. Plus it would be a 5 game rent-a-player. Totally worth it Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.