Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Beast said:

Honestly, it’s pure BS that a player can be released to join any team at this stage.

They have to clear waivers first, so no it’s not that simple. 

Posted
1 hour ago, The Wiz said:

Baltimore finished after the Bills last season so we would have priority if he were subject to waivers.

For the first three weeks of the season, the NFL's waiver wire priority for teams is based on the draft order from that spring's draft. 

The worst team in the league from the previous season has the first claim

The second-worst team has the second claim, and so on

Traded or forfeited draft picks are not considered

After the third week of the season, the waiver claim priority is based on the league's standings and changes weekly. The order is the reverse of the league standings, with the team with the worst record having the highest priority. 

 

So the Ravens would get precedence over the Bills.

 

But keep in mind the Bills beat the Dolphins with Campbell twice this year.  He's still a good player and I'd be happy to see him come on board if there's cap money available, but he's not the difference in getting the Lombardi.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I've heard Campbell has a strong relationship with Greg Rousseau. Perhaps Greg could sway Calais.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Beast said:

Honestly, it’s pure BS that a player can be released to join any team at this stage.

Why?

Posted
1 hour ago, The Wiz said:

Baltimore finished after the Bills last season so we would have priority if he were subject to waivers.

Only in the first 3 weeks. Now it's by record 

Posted
2 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Hopefully the Bills are ready to make an offer. It’ll be between us and the Ravens I believe.

 

We need him.

 

 


Actually the Bills could really use a player like him on the DL.  I’m assuming he would take the Justin Jefferson role.  
 

I think the rumor was that Miami had a deal in place with Baltimore until McDaniel killed it.   It makes me think Baltimore would be his first choice but would definitely take him in Buffalo.  

Posted (edited)

We should've signed him 2 years ago instead of waste time with this manacherie of jags  He would be an upgrade over some of McD's rotational guys.  And he gets a chance at a ring.  But yes if he comes available go get him.

Edited by LABILLBACKER
Posted
1 hour ago, Utah John said:

For the first three weeks of the season, the NFL's waiver wire priority for teams is based on the draft order from that spring's draft. 

The worst team in the league from the previous season has the first claim

The second-worst team has the second claim, and so on

Traded or forfeited draft picks are not considered

After the third week of the season, the waiver claim priority is based on the league's standings and changes weekly. The order is the reverse of the league standings, with the team with the worst record having the highest priority. 

 

So the Ravens would get precedence over the Bills.

 

But keep in mind the Bills beat the Dolphins with Campbell twice this year.  He's still a good player and I'd be happy to see him come on board if there's cap money available, but he's not the difference in getting the Lombardi.


He would not be subject to waivers as he is a vested veteran with 4+ seasons.  
 

He would be a free agent 

11 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

I thought Campbell wasn’t interested in playing in Buffalo weather.

LOL where did you see that?  Baltimore weather isn’t much better

  • Disagree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, JohnNord said:


He would not be subject to waivers as he is a vested veteran with 4+ seasons.  
 

He would be a free agent 

LOL where did you see that?  Baltimore weather isn’t much better

I’m not sure , lol. Just thought I had seen that not long ago. Maybe I’m thinking of a different FA the Bills were interested in 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, boyst said:

he would be subject to have to go through the waiver wire.

 

No he would not...he is a vested vet with more than 4 years(I think it's 4 years) and those players are not subject to waivers.

Edited by Big Turk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
Just now, HOUSE said:

38 years old??

Haaaa, yeah right


Have you watched him this season?  He’s playing great.  Plus it would be a 5 game rent-a-player. Totally worth it

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...