Savage Posted Thursday at 12:09 AM Posted Thursday at 12:09 AM 10 minutes ago, JohnNord said: He would not be subject to waivers as he is a vested veteran with 4+ seasons. He would be a free agent LOL where did you see that? Baltimore weather isn’t much better I’m assuming you don’t live in either Buffalo or Baltimore. 1 Quote
chongli Posted Thursday at 12:15 AM Posted Thursday at 12:15 AM (edited) 13 minutes ago, Big Turk said: No he would not...he is a vested vet with more than 4 years(I think it's 4 years) and those players are not subject to waivers. 18 minutes ago, JohnNord said: He would not be subject to waivers as he is a vested veteran with 4+ seasons. He would be a free agent LOL where did you see that? Baltimore weather isn’t much better 15 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: I’m not sure , lol. Just thought I had seen that not long ago. Maybe I’m thinking of a different FA the Bills were interested in All players must go through waivers after the trade deadline, even vested veterans. https://russellstreetreport.com/salarycap/waiver-rules/#:~:text=2.,not risk losing the player. Edited Thursday at 12:16 AM by chongli 1 2 Quote
HOUSE Posted Thursday at 12:19 AM Posted Thursday at 12:19 AM 10 minutes ago, JohnNord said: Have you watched him this season? He’s playing great. Plus it would be a 5 game rent-a-player. Totally worth it Ok Quote
gonzo1105 Posted Thursday at 12:54 AM Posted Thursday at 12:54 AM Would be a really good add but I think if this happened he’s be going back to Baltimore Quote
That's No Moon Posted Thursday at 01:08 AM Posted Thursday at 01:08 AM 3 hours ago, Andrew Son said: Still, claim him and block him from another contender. Very much this. Which is why I can't imagine someone ahead of us in the order blocking us as well. Quote
boyst Posted Thursday at 01:54 AM Posted Thursday at 01:54 AM 1 hour ago, Big Turk said: No he would not...he is a vested vet with more than 4 years(I think it's 4 years) and those players are not subject to waivers. Negative, ghost rider, the pattern is full After the trade deadline all players go to waivers. 1 Quote
Orlando Buffalo Posted Thursday at 01:58 AM Posted Thursday at 01:58 AM If we could sign him cheaply absolutely but we would paying him as a very short term rental. Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted Thursday at 02:19 AM Posted Thursday at 02:19 AM Ravens would be obvious. Lions have big need. I would love the bills to sign him but I don’t see it happening. Quote
buffalo2218 Posted Thursday at 02:33 AM Posted Thursday at 02:33 AM Idk if this is right or not, but didn't Campbell play in Baltimore before? Quote
SCBills Posted Thursday at 02:36 AM Posted Thursday at 02:36 AM Do we know if he’s subject to waivers? See conflicting info, but if he is… this seems pointless. Hes not getting past the Ravens. They tried to get him at the deadline. Quote
Einstein Posted Thursday at 02:45 AM Posted Thursday at 02:45 AM 5 hours ago, boyst said: he would be subject to have to go through the waiver wire. The idea is that non-playoff teams would respect his wishes and not claim him. Quote
Doc Brown Posted Thursday at 03:04 AM Posted Thursday at 03:04 AM Rams should put a claim in for him. Would he say no to playing in LA? 1 1 Quote
Chaos Posted Thursday at 03:50 AM Posted Thursday at 03:50 AM Would he be able to learn the Bills system before the season ended? Quote
4merper4mer Posted Thursday at 04:13 AM Posted Thursday at 04:13 AM 20 minutes ago, Chaos said: Would he be able to learn the Bills system before the season ended? This off-season he had less focus on contract/money than catching on with a true contender. He decided to sign with the Dolphins. So to answer your question…..there is a pretty good chance he lacks a complete set of analytical skills. 4 Quote
Beck Water Posted Thursday at 05:10 AM Posted Thursday at 05:10 AM (edited) 7 hours ago, The Wiz said: Would he? I thought it was less than 4 years accrued you are subject. Or am I thinking the opposite? You're correct prior to the trade deadline, but after the trade deadline all players (veteran or not) must go through waivers 2 hours ago, buffalo2218 said: Idk if this is right or not, but didn't Campbell play in Baltimore before? Yes, played there 3 years - 2020 to 2024 He was a Beast Edited Thursday at 05:12 AM by Beck Water 2 Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted Thursday at 05:59 AM Posted Thursday at 05:59 AM (edited) 3 hours ago, Einstein said: The idea is that non-playoff teams would respect his wishes and not claim him. Even still, of the 14 will be Playoff teams - we're currently 10th in Priority. Meaning as it stands right now, 9 Different Playoff Teams could put in a claim and get him before we would. And it's possible with our schedule down the stretch that we could fall further down the waiver priority. Edited Thursday at 06:12 AM by BillsFanForever19 Quote
Harold Jackson Posted Thursday at 06:36 AM Posted Thursday at 06:36 AM 9 hours ago, Beast said: Honestly, it’s pure BS that a player can be released to join any team at this stage. Madden settings!! Quote
chongli Posted Thursday at 09:14 AM Posted Thursday at 09:14 AM Wow. This is a really bad thread, quality-wise. The worst I've seen it here. Reading through all four pages, there are redundant posts by different posters on all all four pages asking the same questions and giving the same correct and incorrect answers to these questions. What is four pages could just be one page if people just read through everything before posting. 1 Quote
boyst Posted Thursday at 01:30 PM Posted Thursday at 01:30 PM 10 hours ago, Einstein said: The idea is that non-playoff teams would respect his wishes and not claim him. I get it, but it is also BS The NFLPA agreed to the rules for all of the players. They can't let a single player bully the rules. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.