Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…

How long have you been watching football? 

 

You've never seen a pooch onside kick up the gut? It's always been one of the more successful ways to do it

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…

 

That should have been a flag. The Lion hit Taron before the ball travelled 10 yards and got to him. I know it was bang, bang and that is hard for the officials to see, but definitely should have been a flag.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…

Go back to the come back game - Steve Christie executed a perfect "suicide" onside.....

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

That should have been a flag. The Lion hit Taron before the ball travelled 10 yards and got to him. I know it was bang, bang and that is hard for the officials to see, but definitely should have been a flag.

 
Yep.  I woke my dogs up screaming at the TV.

Posted

Bobby April ran one where he lined them up on each side of the kicker close to him, then kicked it like that, gave more guys a chance to get to it, not sure why no one tries that anymore

Posted
1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said:

Bobby April ran one where he lined them up on each side of the kicker close to him, then kicked it like that, gave more guys a chance to get to it, not sure why no one tries that anymore

 

Not allowed anymore.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Einstein said:

Both of the lions onside kicks were played really well. The first kick was a great play by Hollins, but a perfect kick by the Lions.


was going to say the same thing. Two perfect kicks. In hindsight, the lions should have done onsides kicks all game! 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Not allowed anymore.

Oh how did they change the rule? I know it was 5 on each side and that was how he got around it, do they have to be outside the hash or something now?

Posted
1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said:

Oh how did they change the rule? I know it was 5 on each side and that was how he got around it, do they have to be outside the hash or something now?

 

I believe so yes. Certain yardage away from the kicker I believe.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…

You weren’t a fan of the Bills for the Comeback game if you’ve never seen a straight onside kick.  Look up Mark Pike.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…

Surprise onside kicks have usually been successful when kicked straight and thr kicker or ones next to him recovered.  
 

the problem is it’s hard to get the high bounce that you usually recover kicks from or to get the ball to travel 10 yards

Posted
10 minutes ago, chaccof said:

Go back to the come back game - Steve Christie executed a perfect "suicide" onside.....

Was going to say. Pike, I believe, blew up the return man on that one. But this one the Lions did was just about perfect. That ball was loose in there for a bit. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

The Bills had "hands" on both sides with Shakir and Hollins. Taron might have the better hands on defense now that Hyde is not back there. But I'd put Coleman in Taron's place for onside kick defense in the future.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why do teams go lateral? Kick it straight forward and have kicker ram the guy catching it. I’ve never seen an onside kick like that. Would definitely increase chances from 3%…


I don’t know  - I think it’s tough to kick the ball perfectly like the kick by Detroit today.

 

Also you’re asking your kicker to do a lot.  Not only kicking the ball perfectly but also delivering a big collision and possibly coming out of the scum with the football.  That’s less than ideal and you don’t want your kicker hurt.  

6 minutes ago, Mikie2times said:

Was going to say. Pike, I believe, blew up the return man on that one. But this one the Lions did was just about perfect. That ball was loose in there for a bit. 


I think the new kicking rules make it harder to pull that off.  
 

IIRC Pike laid out the Oiler going for the ball and Christie recovered.   

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...