Process Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Sean is defending the decision to call the timeout in his press conference 🤣 Saying it was the best decision 🤣 Quote
HappyDays Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, Process said: Sean is defending the decision to call the timeout in his press conference 🤣 Saying it was the best decision 🤣 I'm listening now and I'm in shock! Genuinely thought he was going to come up to the podium and say "this loss is on me", instead he's actually saying that they did what they thought was the best course of action. In his opening statement he says "I wish we had run the ball with our RBs more". He has no clue what even caused this loss. Wow. 1 Quote
Process Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, HappyDays said: I'm listening now and I'm in shock! Genuinely thought he was going to come up to the podium and say "this loss is on me", instead he's actually saying that they did what they thought was the best course of action. In his opening statement he says "I wish we had run the ball with our RBs more". He has no clue what even caused this loss. Wow. I can't believe what I am listening too lol Quote
NoSaint Posted December 9 Posted December 9 2 minutes ago, jlgarsh said: It would have been 4th and 9. Stafford stepped out of bounds for a sack. also forcing the kick there eliminates threat of a 2 score game and gives you click flexibility. Letting them bleed time and score is crushing. End their drive and go win it. 1 Quote
mike22nc Posted December 9 Posted December 9 McDermott's press conference happening right now is a disaster. He doesn't understand. 1 Quote
CincyBillsFan Posted December 9 Posted December 9 25 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: To me thats great coaching on the Rams sideline and/or Stafford checking on that play. They caught the Bills in what they were trying to do and exploited it. If you want to say that was the wrong move than I get it but we don't know what happens if we drop into zone there either. Football 101 is you try to take away the opponents best weapon. On that play the Bills almost ignored the best WR on the field today. Quote
BillsFan130 Posted December 9 Posted December 9 (edited) Here's the thing that no one is talking about.. Accept or decline? You can make an argument either way. But the most idiotic thing? You accept the penalty and then play a PREVENT defence which allows them to get the yards back and chew more clock up. If you accept it, you HAVE to be aggressive on defence and try to force a punt, not play prevent Edited December 9 by BillsFan130 2 1 Quote
Roundybout Posted December 9 Posted December 9 2 minutes ago, Process said: Sean is defending the decision to call the timeout in his press conference 🤣 Saying it was the best decision 🤣 He’s correct. We would have lost a ton of time resetting from the pile. There was no good plan after the sneak failed. 2 Quote
HomeskillitMoorman Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, BillsFan130 said: Here's the thing that no one is talking about.. Accept or decline? You can make an argument either way. But the most idiotic thing? You accept the penalty and then play a PREVENT defence which allows them to get the yards back and choose more clock up. If you accept it, you HAVE to be aggressive on defence and try to force a punt, not play prevent None of it makes any sense. He's a total clown that has no idea what he's doing in year 8. Almost a decade. It's wild that it feels like 50% of the board doesn't find this alarming. Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted December 9 Posted December 9 (edited) This guy just doesn’t get it. When you have to overcome your own coaching, it’s really unfair to Josh. Win the Super Bowl this year or hire Belichek. He WILL NOT coach us out of games. Pay enough to Keep Brady and bring Belichek in to fix the little things and the defense. Edited December 9 by Brianmoorman4jesus 1 Quote
Mango Posted December 9 Posted December 9 28 minutes ago, FireChans said: Do you know if he has an opinion on the HC who keeps losing because he hasn't learned the value of leaving time for your HoF QB to make a play after losing a game in 13 seconds? QB isn’t good enough. LA Rams have a better one. Because palm trees. Quote
Cheektowaga Chad Posted December 9 Posted December 9 1 minute ago, BillsFan130 said: Here's the thing that no one is talking about.. Accept or decline? You can make an argument either way. But the most idiotic thing? You accept the penalty and then play a PREVENT defence which allows them to get the yards back and chew more clock up. If you accept it, you HAVE to be aggressive on defence and try to force a punt, not play prevent In a game where time is becoming valuable you also allow the rams to burn another 40 seconds off the clock either way Quote
Roundybout Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said: This guy just doesn’t get it. When you have to overcome your own coaching, it’s really unfair to Josh. Win the Super Bowl this year or hire Belichek. He WILL NOT coach us out of games. Pat enough to Keep Brady and bring Belichek in to fix the little things and the defense. If we let the clock run down after the failed sneak, then people would be screaming that McD didn’t use the timeout. He. Can’t. Win. 1 1 Quote
DJB Posted December 9 Posted December 9 1 hour ago, Process said: 1. Declining the penalty on 3rd and 7 was clearly the correct move YOU NEED A TD TD WIN NO MATTER WHAT. Would have been 4th and 7 vs 4th and 5. Would they have kicked the FG with 7 yards needed instead of 5? Who knows., but the decision was wrong regardless. and somehow this next one is 10000x worse. 2. You can not, under any circumstance. call a TO after the QB sneak. Sneaking it is dumb, but if you are going to do it you tell the guys if they stop it you hurry up, spend 10 seconds getting back to the line, and run it again. The second Sean called TO the game was over. No you decline the penalty let them take a long FG. Who cares if they make it, they would be up by 6 and we go get 7 with #17 Accepting the penalty, wasting more clock was a dumb decision. Agreed on the TO. Quote
BillsFan130 Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, HomeskillitMoorman said: None of it makes any sense. He's a total clown that has no idea what he's doing in year 8. Almost a decade. It's wild that it feels like 50% of the board doesn't find this alarming. I can get accepting it cause you're trying to take them out of field goal range. What I can't accept is accepting it and then literally playing a soft coverage that lets them get the yards back lol. Beyond idiotic Quote
Process Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, Roundybout said: He’s correct. We would have lost a ton of time resetting from the pile. There was no good plan after the sneak failed. You and him are wrong. There is only one correct answer in this case there isn't a debate. Even if it takes 30 seconds (which it won't), that's STILL better than colling a TO. 1 1 Quote
BillsFan130 Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, Cheektowaga Chad said: In a game where time is becoming valuable you also allow the rams to burn another 40 seconds off the clock either way For sure. Which is why if you accept it, you have to play more aggressive and try to force a punt Quote
Process Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, DJB said: No you decline the penalty let them take a long FG. Who cares if they make it, they would be up by 6 and we go get 7 with #17 Accepting the penalty, wasting more clock was a dumb decision. Agreed on the TO. Read it again Quote
RichRiderBills Posted December 9 Posted December 9 5 minutes ago, dhbGT500 said: Yes, should've declined the penalty...and should not have called the TO. But, bottom line...the defense not stopping anything, was the reason for this loss...or, the blocked punt/TD....period. If they wanna get to the SB, then cannot make the other team only punt one time and have no take aways. ...but you don't like to see those kind of coaching mistakes. Not for a serious contender. Less discussed was our not fielding the punt but not putting an extra rusher to block the kick. Codger may have just made a mistake there, but needed to field it. Quote
Roundybout Posted December 9 Posted December 9 Just now, Process said: You and him are wrong. There is only one correct answer in this case there isn't a debate. Even if it takes 30 seconds (which it won't), that's STILL better than colling a TO. We will agree to disagree. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.