Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Alright, you filthy animals, i need you to settle a raging debate we've got going on in my office right now.......

 

If you could only have one, would you want the #1 seed or a fully healthy roster?.......you can only have one.

Literally half the office is saying to make a solid push for the #1 seed no matter the outcome and the other half is saying that we're already in the playoffs, so getting our roster as healthy as possible for the postseason should be the number one priority.

 

Your input and feedback are valuable in calming my office down presently.

I mean, i like a good debate, however, this may get out of control shortly.

Posted

The idea that you would rest your starters with five games to go with the #1 seed within grasp is ridiculous.

 

If not suggesting that you play backups then how do you angle for a healthy roster? Play less intense to try to avoid injury? That's how I juries happen.

 

The Bills absolutely go the the #1 seed. And at the same time, let players that are injured have a little extra time before coming back. But you don't take the foot off the gas or rest healthy starters. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

1 seed-the bye gives you a chance to rest guys to get them healthy for the playoffs. There’s no guarantee that your players won’t get injured-didn’t Bernard get injured in last year’s game against the Steelers? Also, anything can happen in the playoffs-one extra game is one more game the team could lose. So go for the 1 seed 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

The idea that you would rest your starters with five games to go with the #1 seed within grasp is ridiculous.

Am I missing something here? Color me curious.

Posted

1 seed big time. Not only does it get you to the divisional round automatically, but you do so without having to risk injuries in the wild card round like we did against Pittsburgh last year. 
 

I don’t think there is a question. Plus you guarantee all games run through buffalo so long as we win. 

Posted

Well, you really don’t get to choose. You hope your roster is fully healthy but there’s not much you can do. As pointed out by others, no one is resting starters with 5 games to go. As long as the #1 seed is in play, no one sits. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, loveorhatembillsfan4life said:

5 games left is way too many games in my mind to think about this.

Again, where is this resting players with 5 games to go concept coming from? 

Posted

My ideal scenario is the Bills blowing out the Chiefs in arrowhead in the AFC championship so give me the option of being healthy going into the playoffs 

  • Agree 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, Sweats said:

Alright, you filthy animals, i need you to settle a raging debate we've got going on in my office right now.......

 

If you could only have one, would you want the #1 seed or a fully healthy roster?.......you can only have one.

Literally half the office is saying to make a solid push for the #1 seed no matter the outcome and the other half is saying that we're already in the playoffs, so getting our roster as healthy as possible for the postseason should be the number one priority.

 

Your input and feedback are valuable in calming my office down presently.

I mean, i like a good debate, however, this may get out of control shortly.

So should we just forfeit our last five games to ensure a healthy roster?  Or just bring up 20 practice squad players and put all our starters on IR?

  • Thank you (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...