MVP hype for Allen

[strive_for_five_guy]

1 hour ago, SCBills said:

So… what’s at play here with people like Cam?

 

Purely for tv or other motives?

 

Because Cam is either lazy or purposefully uneducated with his takes on Allen. 
 

He puts him as elite with Mahomes, Burrow and Lamar, but some of this stuff, from people like him, comes off personal.  This is a pattern with him now. 
 

 

Cam has some of the worst takes ever.  When I’ve watched him, even the other guys on the set seem to be wondering what Cam’s smoking.  I mean, look at how the guy is dressed? 

[Punch]

I don't know if it's technically MVP hype, but I was looking through my saved social media and came across this tweet from September that says it all:

 

 

[Generic_Bills_Fan]

10 hours ago, strive_for_five_guy said:

Cam has some of the worst takes ever.  When I’ve watched him, even the other guys on the set seem to be wondering what Cam’s smoking.  I mean, look at how the guy is dressed? 

Cam despises Josh and everyone can see it lol I think it’s a jealousy thing 

[Sammy Watkins' Rib]

8 hours ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

Cam despises Josh and everyone can see it lol I think it’s a jealousy thing 

 

Josh is going to blow away his QB career rushing TD record which is probably the only thing Cam has left to hold onto. Hurts will blow by it as well if his career doesn't flame out early like Cam's did. 

[Sammy Watkins' Rib]

On 12/19/2024 at 9:21 AM, Sojourner said:

Lamar, whilst I agree has the more efficient stat line this year can’t walk away with it over even Jalen Hurts, Goff, Saquon and Josh. Not when the way it panned out last year. 
 

 

But all the advanced efficiency metrics favor Allen. Allen has a higher QBR and EPA. So it isn't even really true that Lamar has been the more efficient player. 

 

One of the other arguments you hear is that Lamar would have more rushing TD's if he didn't have Henry on his team. That is also false. For one, look at Lamar's entire career. He has never been a high volume rushing TD QB. Why would this year with or without Henry be any different? Second, James cook has  the same amount of rushing TD's as Henry, they both have 13. So if the argument is Henry has stolen some rushing TD's from Lamar, why is the same not true for Allen?

[Kelly to Allen]

10 minutes ago, Sammy Watkins' Rib said:

 

But all the advanced efficiency metrics favor Allen. Allen has a higher QBR and EPA. So it isn't even really true that Lamar has been the more efficient player. 

 

One of the other arguments you hear is that Lamar would have more rushing TD's if he didn't have Henry on his team. That is also false. For one, look at Lamar's entire career. He has never been a high volume rushing TD QB. Why would this year with or without Henry be any different? Second, James cook has  the same amount of rushing TD's as Henry, they both have 13. So if the argument is Henry has stolen some rushing TD's from Lamar, why is the same not true for Allen?

 

If the argument is for Lamar, are we now going to have a player in the era of Allen and Mahomes with 3 MVPs and Allen have none....

 

On the surface that seems silly and completely ridiculous. But who knows anymore honestly 

 

You can't keep winning MVP but be terrible in the playoffs compared to the other two super star contemporaries 

 

How do you have 3 MVPs but no rings... It doesn't make sense 

 

If Lamar were to win MVP and Mahomes or Allen win the super bowl and Lamar is terrible in the playoffs. I just don't get how the media wouldn't be embarrassed at that point. 

Edited 11 hours ago by Kelly to Allen