Mr. WEO Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Lol where was the Davis positivity the last three years or so? in my Davis posts over the past 3 years. 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 23 hours ago, GoBills808 said: Correct imo I don't understand how this is even a controversial take. Allen has clearly taken more damage through half this season than he has any year since he got to the league I don't see how that's clear at all. As I laid out in another post, on a per -game basis to date, Allen is running at a career low for sacks, close to a career low for QB hits, and at a career low for rush attempts per game. As far as I can tell, he's sliding more per rush attempt as well. What are you looking at to make this conclusion? Is it some sort of eyeball metric for "viciousness of the hit"? That's not to say that Allen hasn't taken too many hits and too much damage in his previous seasons, just that I don't see how it's clear he's taken more damage this season. Edited 7 hours ago by Beck Water 2 Quote
GoBills808 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Beck Water said: I don't see how that's clear at all. As I laid out in another post, on a per -game basis to date, Allen is running at a career low for sacks, close to a career low for QB hits, and at a career low for rush attempts per game. As far as I can tell, he's sliding more per rush attempt as well. What are you looking at to make this conclusion? Is it some sort of eyeball metric for "viciousness of the hit"? That's not to say that Allen hasn't taken too many hits and too much damage in his previous seasons, just that I don't see how it's clear he's taken more damage this season. Damage=injuries Quote
Don Otreply Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said: Based on production (to this point on the Bills), Davis is the best WR Beane has drafted. lol Brown and Beasley....come on Brown had one good season with the Bills (before Davis got there), then he was done. Brown/Beasely 2.0 was the most bizarre Offensive move Beane ever made. Davis’s prized production over four seasons boils down to about a dozen games, he was hit or miss throughout his time here, his catch rate was overall not so good, he was injured every season and his play while playing injured wasn’t remarkable, by the time he left with no offer on the table from the Bills his production was quite sad. Nice guy and all but he has peaked as a player and is very likely looking at the horizon of his career, I guess we are going to disagree on this, but that’s just fine, 👍 1 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 30 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Damage=injuries OK, so he's injured his L hand this season Rookie year: partially torn UCL, missed 4 games 2019: concussion, missed 0 games 2020: shoulder sprain, played in LB brace for 3 games and passed poorly for 4 2021: turf toe, missed 0 games 2022: partially torn UCL, missed 0 games but passing down for about 6 games 2023: shoulder sprain, missed 0 games 2024: L hand injury, may have dinged right hand on a helmet but did not undergo medical exam treatment ; examined for concussion but cleared I think there's some recency bias in the list because I'm pretty sure Allen was pulled from the game and examined for concussion in at least one previous year. So ?? where's the "clearly taken more damage" in the "damage = injuries" you cite? Quote
GoBills808 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Beck Water said: OK, so he's injured his L hand this season Rookie year: partially torn UCL, missed 4 games 2019: concussion, missed 0 games 2020: shoulder sprain, played in LB brace for 3 games and passed poorly for 4 2021: turf toe, missed 0 games 2022: partially torn UCL, missed 0 games but passing down for about 6 games 2023: shoulder sprain, missed 0 games 2024: L hand injury, may have dinged right hand on a helmet but did not undergo medical exam treatment ; examined for concussion but cleared I think there's some recency bias in the list because I'm pretty sure Allen was pulled from the game and examined for concussion in at least one previous year. So ?? where's the "clearly taken more damage" in the "damage = injuries" you cite? 😂😂 We still pretending he didn't get knocked out in Ravens game too huh 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 48 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: 😂😂 We still pretending he didn't get knocked out in Ravens game too huh If your standard is "I spy with my Little Eye" and not injury reports, in fairness you would have to have eyeball-saw-it notes for every game of Allen's career. Otherwise, as "Simon says", this is recency bias. For example, I think Allen got his "bell rung" in the 2022 Green Bay game, that being the reason a 24-7 drubbing turned into a game for the Pack, when Allen threw picks on back-to-back drives and his completion percentage plummeted in the 2nd half. At the time of the Ravens game, @Simon commented that wasn't Allen's first "turf nap". Again, I'm not saying there shouldn't be concern about Allen taking a beating, I'm just saying your contention "Allen has clearly taken more damage through half this season than he has any year since he got to the league" doesn't seem to be supported by facts. Allen has taken a serious beating every year of his career, and one can make an argument that this season (knock wood!!!!!) if anything it's a bit less. Edited 5 hours ago by Beck Water 1 Quote
GoBills808 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Beck Water said: If your standard is "I spy with my Little Eye" and not injury reports, in fairness you would have to have eyeball-saw-it notes for every game of Allen's career. Otherwise, as "Simon says", this is recency bias. For example, I think Allen got his "bell rung" in the 2022 Green Bay game, that being the reason a 24-7 drubbing turned into a game for the Pack, when Allen threw picks on back-to-back drives and his completion percentage plummeted in the 2nd half. At the time of the Ravens game, @Simon commented that wasn't Allen's first "turf nap". Again, I'm not saying there shouldn't be concern about Allen taking a beating, I'm just saying your contention "Allen has clearly taken more damage through half this season than he has any year since he got to the league" doesn't seem to be supported by facts. Allen has taken a serious beating every year of his career, and one can make an argument that this season (knock wood!!!!!) if anything it's a bit less. Of course it's what I see. I think using injury reports as indicative as to the amount of damage a player takes in a given season is about as simple an analysis as there is And you definitely don't want to use subsequent comp%😂😂 as a point of reference, not when he followed up ravens game w one of the worst passing outings as far as comp% goes to Texans 1 Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 11 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Of course it's what I see. I think using injury reports as indicative as to the amount of damage a player takes in a given season is about as simple an analysis as there is And you definitely don't want to use subsequent comp%😂😂 as a point of reference, not when he followed up ravens game w one of the worst passing outings as far as comp% goes to Texans INjury reports are a joke, theres always people left off it to mess with the other team. OR, phony injuries Quote
Simon Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, Mike in Horseheads said: INjury reports are a joke, theres always people left off it to mess with the other team. OR, phony injuries I am currently posting with a Grade 2 amygdala sprain and bruised isles of Langerhans. That should explain a lot... 1 Quote
GoBills808 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Mike in Horseheads said: INjury reports are a joke, theres always people left off it to mess with the other team. OR, phony injuries It's about the worst way of making the argument imo 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 33 minutes ago, GoBills808 said: Of course it's what I see. I think using injury reports as indicative as to the amount of damage a player takes in a given season is about as simple an analysis as there is And you definitely don't want to use subsequent comp%😂😂 as a point of reference, not when he followed up ravens game w one of the worst passing outings as far as comp% goes to Texans My point stands - if you're going by what you see, you need to have notes of every Allen game in each season. Otherwise, Recency Bias is a known thing. You want to say "I spy with my little eye that Allen has clearly taken more damage through half this season than he has any year since he got to the league and it's not arguable" well, you're correct that your contention it's not arguable, because you see it how you see it and you can fold in or exclude whatever you want in your "I spy" thing. But it's certainly not necessarily true. I think you're losing the script here. Why wouldn't one want to use completion %? If you want to contend that Allen got a "nap tap" in the Ravens game and should have been in protocol, then his completion % may very well have been down the subsequent week. It's the same contention I'm making about the Green Bay game - which he finished with a completion % of 52%, followed by 53% the following week in the loss to the Jets. In the Jets game, Allen had Diggs and Davis to throw to, as well as McKenzie and Kumerow. In the Houston game, no Shakir, just Coleman, as well as Samuel and Hollins - worse receiving group, worse completion %. Anyway, I'm Out, because as I said, if we're playing "injuries as detected by GoBills808's Mark IV Eyeball", there's no basis for discussion. Quote
GoBills808 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Beck Water said: My point stands - if you're going by what you see, you need to have notes of every Allen game in each season. Otherwise, Recency Bias is a known thing. You want to say "I spy with my little eye that Allen has clearly taken more damage through half this season than he has any year since he got to the league and it's not arguable" well, you're correct that your contention it's not arguable, because you see it how you see it and you can fold in or exclude whatever you want in your "I spy" thing. But it's certainly not necessarily true. I think you're losing the script here. Why wouldn't one want to use completion %? If you want to contend that Allen got a "nap tap" in the Ravens game and should have been in protocol, then his completion % may very well have been down the subsequent week. It's the same contention I'm making about the Green Bay game - which he finished with a completion % of 52%, followed by 53% the following week in the loss to the Jets. In the Jets game, Allen had Diggs and Davis to throw to, as well as McKenzie and Kumerow. In the Houston game, no Shakir, just Coleman, as well as Samuel and Hollins - worse receiving group, worse completion %. Anyway, I'm Out, because as I said, if we're playing "injuries as detected by GoBills808's Mark IV Eyeball", there's no basis for discussion. No You're out because you tried using the injury report and then completion% to support your argument and then realized neither was valid As well you should Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Simon said: I am currently posting with a Grade 2 amygdala sprain and bruised isles of Langerhans. That should explain a lot... Yes , Yes it does... 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.