Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It looked like it went directly over the right goal post, which would be good.   No camera on the cross bar, so I don’t know how they would have overturned it.  
 

I think it was good 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 1
Posted

Echoing what others have said here, it certainly looks like it could have been called good (had we not been playing the Chiefs, of course).

  • Like (+1) 9
Posted

The entire operation of Reid/Martin/Bass looked just a bit off today. High snaps, snaps to the outside shoulder of Martin...did Martin get the ball spinned or were laces in?

 

Bass does have a bad habit of pushing kicks to the right.  But in today's NFL, still not sure why we can't have goalposts with cameras at the top.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 7
Posted

With all the technology we have these days, that doesn't feel like something that should be so hard to determine anymore. It's not really that complex to put a camera in each goalpost pointing upward with a reticle on the output that shows if the ball passed to the inside or outside of the center of the post.

 

Cameras are too expensive? OK. You could do the same thing with a laser.  You'd see it hit the ball on its way past with the cameras they already have on the game.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

The entire operation of Reid/Martin/Bass looked just a bit off today. High snaps, snaps to the outside shoulder of Martin...did Martin get the ball spinned or were laces in?

 

Bass does have a bad habit of pushing kicks to the right.  But in today's NFL, still not sure why we can't have goalposts with cameras at the top.

 

Maybe NFLPA objects to it like they object to a lot of changes for it cannot be NFL cannot afford it.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Another Fan said:

 

Me too.

 

Bigger issue I have is I still have trust issues with Bass.  

we still don't know if the kick was bad or the hold was bad or the snap was bad....I am sure the coaches know it and will deal with it accordingly

Posted

If they can put cameras in pylons, why can't they put a camera inide the top of both uprights looking straight up??

 

That way they would have a clear view of wether the ball went directly over the upright or not.

 

Seems like a simple fix to me.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Its crazy they can't put a camera on each post to remove any doubt in these cases

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, Special K said:

If they can put cameras in pylons, why can't they put a camera inide the top of both uprights looking straight up??

 

That way they would have a clear view of wether the ball went directly over the upright or not.

 

Seems like a simple fix to me.


Might be tough to make a call especially if there is just enough wind to make the uprights shake a bit.

w

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...