Riverboat Ritchie Posted Monday at 04:23 AM Posted Monday at 04:23 AM I can not find a clip of replay but some are reporting that it was good. Was it? Quote
RiotAct Posted Monday at 04:25 AM Posted Monday at 04:25 AM Looked very similar to that XP by Fairbairn against us week 5 that they called good. 5 Quote
Punch Posted Monday at 04:25 AM Posted Monday at 04:25 AM Nantz and Romo thought it was good during the broadcast. I actually missed it. 1 2 Quote
Virgil Posted Monday at 04:25 AM Posted Monday at 04:25 AM It looked like it went directly over the right goal post, which would be good. No camera on the cross bar, so I don’t know how they would have overturned it. I think it was good 5 1 Quote
coloradobillsfan Posted Monday at 04:26 AM Posted Monday at 04:26 AM "Looked good to me!" -Pinto Kenny Super Bowl XXV 1 8 1 Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted Monday at 04:27 AM Posted Monday at 04:27 AM it’s an extremely subjective call when it’s above the goalpost, similar to when the ball is punted out of bounds and where they determine it went out. 2 Quote
Bruffalo Posted Monday at 04:27 AM Posted Monday at 04:27 AM Echoing what others have said here, it certainly looks like it could have been called good (had we not been playing the Chiefs, of course). 9 Quote
russ t. nail Posted Monday at 04:27 AM Posted Monday at 04:27 AM On broadcast from first angle looked good. Second angle looked like it maybe missed. I thought the snap was bad though, had to adjust and thought it threw off the timing. 6 Quote
MasterStrategist Posted Monday at 04:29 AM Posted Monday at 04:29 AM The entire operation of Reid/Martin/Bass looked just a bit off today. High snaps, snaps to the outside shoulder of Martin...did Martin get the ball spinned or were laces in? Bass does have a bad habit of pushing kicks to the right. But in today's NFL, still not sure why we can't have goalposts with cameras at the top. 4 7 Quote
That's No Moon Posted Monday at 04:32 AM Posted Monday at 04:32 AM With all the technology we have these days, that doesn't feel like something that should be so hard to determine anymore. It's not really that complex to put a camera in each goalpost pointing upward with a reticle on the output that shows if the ball passed to the inside or outside of the center of the post. Cameras are too expensive? OK. You could do the same thing with a laser. You'd see it hit the ball on its way past with the cameras they already have on the game. 7 3 4 Quote
Saxum Posted Monday at 04:36 AM Posted Monday at 04:36 AM 4 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said: The entire operation of Reid/Martin/Bass looked just a bit off today. High snaps, snaps to the outside shoulder of Martin...did Martin get the ball spinned or were laces in? Bass does have a bad habit of pushing kicks to the right. But in today's NFL, still not sure why we can't have goalposts with cameras at the top. Maybe NFLPA objects to it like they object to a lot of changes for it cannot be NFL cannot afford it. Quote
gonzo1105 Posted Monday at 04:38 AM Posted Monday at 04:38 AM I thought he missed it but that’s just my opinion 2 Quote
Another Fan Posted Monday at 04:44 AM Posted Monday at 04:44 AM 1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said: I thought he missed it but that’s just my opinion Me too. Bigger issue I have is I still have trust issues with Bass. 1 Quote
ganesh Posted Monday at 04:55 AM Posted Monday at 04:55 AM 9 minutes ago, Another Fan said: Me too. Bigger issue I have is I still have trust issues with Bass. we still don't know if the kick was bad or the hold was bad or the snap was bad....I am sure the coaches know it and will deal with it accordingly Quote
Special K Posted Monday at 04:57 AM Posted Monday at 04:57 AM If they can put cameras in pylons, why can't they put a camera inide the top of both uprights looking straight up?? That way they would have a clear view of wether the ball went directly over the upright or not. Seems like a simple fix to me. 2 4 1 Quote
Beast Posted Monday at 04:59 AM Posted Monday at 04:59 AM Go back to the old H style goalposts and add another 5 to 10 feet in height to the uprights. 2 Quote
stevewin Posted Monday at 05:03 AM Posted Monday at 05:03 AM Its crazy they can't put a camera on each post to remove any doubt in these cases 2 2 Quote
Rubes Posted Monday at 05:16 AM Posted Monday at 05:16 AM 18 minutes ago, Special K said: If they can put cameras in pylons, why can't they put a camera inide the top of both uprights looking straight up?? That way they would have a clear view of wether the ball went directly over the upright or not. Seems like a simple fix to me. Might be tough to make a call especially if there is just enough wind to make the uprights shake a bit. w 1 1 Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted Monday at 05:26 AM Posted Monday at 05:26 AM A couple of cheap wifi camera's won't cost the league much 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.