dickleyjones Posted Monday at 01:00 PM Posted Monday at 01:00 PM "there’s no irrefutable evidence we would not have won last year" Quote
NewEra Posted Monday at 01:13 PM Posted Monday at 01:13 PM 17 minutes ago, FireChans said: KC was missing a lot of guys yesterday lol As were we. Who were they missing in the playoffs? Right. 1 Quote
DCofNC Posted Monday at 01:13 PM Posted Monday at 01:13 PM 9 hours ago, zow2 said: Kelce was better, he’s looking older now even one season removed. KC also had Rashee Rice, Pacheco and MVS making plays. Their offense is not as good right now as it was in that game. Agree completely, Kelce has fallen off a cliff. He looks old, chubby and slow out there. Gray is the bigger threat. Quote
FireChans Posted Monday at 01:17 PM Posted Monday at 01:17 PM 4 minutes ago, NewEra said: As were we. Who were they missing in the playoffs? Right. So because we can beat them when they are also banged up is irrefutable evidence we can beat them when they are healthy? 1 Quote
NewEra Posted Monday at 01:19 PM Posted Monday at 01:19 PM Just now, FireChans said: So because we can beat them when they are also banged up is irrefutable evidence we can beat them when they are healthy? Nothing is “irrefutable” in hindsight. But yes, we would’ve won if we would’ve had some of our young studs out there. Quote
FireChans Posted Monday at 01:20 PM Posted Monday at 01:20 PM Just now, NewEra said: Nothing is “irrefutable” in hindsight. But yes, we would’ve won if we would’ve had some of our young studs out there. I think we would’ve won too. Just not sure yesterday was irrefutable proof. Quote
NewEra Posted Monday at 01:26 PM Posted Monday at 01:26 PM 5 minutes ago, FireChans said: I think we would’ve won too. Just not sure yesterday was irrefutable proof. Agreed. I don’t think there is ever really irrefutable proof that something would’ve happened. Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted Monday at 01:33 PM Posted Monday at 01:33 PM Pacheco's running style is the fuel for their offense IMO. If he had played, last night could have gone differently Quote
Neo Posted Monday at 01:34 PM Posted Monday at 01:34 PM 1 hour ago, Matt_In_NH said: Because shoe horning the outcome yesterday as analysis that they would have won last year is an ridiculous. Using injuries as an excuse is sad, teams have injuries all the time. I am not disputing the Bills were at a large disadvantage at LB and CB, they were but they could have won that game and also, they could have lost yesterday. When these teams play it is close. You call winning a game against a team you lost to last year in a certain manner "irrefutable" evidence they would have won last year as some kind of analysis? Some players are different, some coaches are different, the injury situations are different. The premise of this thread is outrageous, nothing that happened yesterday shows what might have been different last year. Every game in the NFL is a unique entity. To the bolded, can you show where I said there was no irrefutable evidence we would not have won? My point is it has no relevance. I pointed out you dismissed a view or conclusion because it lacked irrefutable evidence. I didn’t address any conclusion you made about outcomes. I rejected your standard. Quote
Sabres 2025 Posted Monday at 01:37 PM Posted Monday at 01:37 PM 9 hours ago, Special K said: The Bills would have won last years playoff game if their Defense was at full health. The defense didn't lose the game last year, the offense did. They scored 7 points in the entire 2nd half. They won the time of possession battle 37 minutes to 23 minutes and they won the turnover battle, and they still only scored 24 points. Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted Monday at 01:40 PM Posted Monday at 01:40 PM 4 minutes ago, Neo said: I pointed out you dismissed a view or conclusion because it lacked irrefutable evidence. I didn’t address any conclusion you made about outcomes. I rejected your standard. You reject relevance in analysis as a standard, ok. Quote
GASabresIUFan Posted Monday at 01:44 PM Posted Monday at 01:44 PM (edited) Irrefutable proof that..... 1) The Bills can beat anyone in the NFL at any time except Balitmore. 2) That Shakir and Bernard are the two best Bills players not named Josh Allen 3) Josh Allen is the most entertaining player in the NFL 4) This team is actually getting better week by week and just wait until they get healthy 5) Curtis Samuel lives. 6) The officiating remains terrible in the NFL. Edited Monday at 01:53 PM by GASabresIUFan Quote
ganesh Posted Monday at 01:47 PM Posted Monday at 01:47 PM 1 hour ago, Spiderweb said: Klein was an old style thumper. Good against the run and had some blitz capability, but we all saw that while he was here, covering anyone in the pass game was not in his wheel house. Which is Bernard's strength Quote
Neo Posted Monday at 01:56 PM Posted Monday at 01:56 PM 14 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said: You reject relevance in analysis as a standard, ok. No, and again, I’m rejecting irrefutable proof as a standard for analysis. I’m a man of limited capacity and can’t be more clear. Best wishes …. Quote
harmonkillebrew Posted Monday at 01:59 PM Posted Monday at 01:59 PM Need to see their healthy O (Rice, Pacheco, etc) matched up against our healthy D (Milano, Bernard, ...) to make the call. Probably wont' ever happen. But I did like hanging 30 on them even without Kincaid, Keon and Brown. Winning by two scores is a sign that we've potentially finally passed them. Quote
Mikie2times Posted Monday at 02:02 PM Posted Monday at 02:02 PM 3 hours ago, Kelly to Allen said: Allen and Mahomes have almost identical playoff numbers in their first ten playoff games.... Take a peak at the Divisional round or later, not that I really care about this conversation at the moment Quote
Simon Posted Monday at 02:03 PM Posted Monday at 02:03 PM [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you. Quote
All_Pro_Bills Posted Monday at 02:08 PM Posted Monday at 02:08 PM While the line blocking for the running game, minus Allen, was nothing to get excited about the difference maker for me was how the Bills offensive line picked up and handled the Chiefs blitz package. 1 Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted Monday at 02:13 PM Posted Monday at 02:13 PM (edited) 11 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: Take a peak at the Divisional round or later, not that I really care about this conversation at the moment If you take out all of Allens wildcard rounds He still has the same playoff numbers as burrow if I'm not mistaken Similar passer rating Passing touchdowns Passing touchdown % EPA Qbr Int% Y/a Edited Monday at 02:14 PM by Kelly to Allen Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted Monday at 02:24 PM Posted Monday at 02:24 PM 19 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: Take a peak at the Divisional round or later, not that I really care about this conversation at the moment Yeah I just looked it up Both burrow and Allen have played in 5 div rd or further playoff games Allen has 8 passing touchdowns and 2 int Burrow has 6 passing touchdowns and 4 int Allen has 11 total tds and 2 total turnovers Burrow is the same 6 to 4 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.