mannc Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Just now, Mikie2times said: That is so close, could go either way I think there is a rule in that situation… 2 1 Quote
RiotAct Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Just now, streetkings01 said: Romo is so annoying….thats an obvious catch! it’ll be overturned. 1 Quote
Einstein Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Just now, Carmel Corn said: Referees deliberately held up the Bills from being able to quick snap the ball…. It’s because the defense has the right to change personnel if the offense does. We should have ran to the line with our same personnel and snapped it quick. Quote
zow2 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 huh? weve seen 100 catches like that over the last few years. Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Catch or not, I haven’t seen a bills receiver make an adjustment like that on a ball. Really great play. 5 3 Quote
Scott7975 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Looked like foot was still down when he caught it. Ball never moved so it should be possession as he catches it. 1 Quote
Sojourner Posted November 17 Posted November 17 QUICK. GET THE STATS ON OVERTURNED CALLS VIA A CHALLENGE IN LAND SHARK REFEREED GAMES! Quote
gobills404 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Too close to be overturned which means it will be cause of our opponent 1 Quote
BuffBills51 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 We all know how this will go. No way the catch sticks. Quote
Meatloaf63 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Just now, streetkings01 said: Romo is so annoying….thats an obvious catch! Same exact thing that happened when we tried to challenge the Kc catch if they called this out then that should’ve been out also. 1 Quote
Yobogoya! Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Just now, Ralonzo said: Right foot down when he caught it, left foot down inbound. The call will be overturned because Chiefs. I don’t think the right foot was down long enough after he had control of the ball 1 1 Quote
Heels20X6 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Ok. What am I missing? Seems like an obvious catch. Caught the ball with his foot down and then second foot, then out of bounds. Possession the whole time. Quote
GunnerBill Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I like taking shots against the KC blitz. 1 1 1 Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I hope I'm wrong - but I think that gets overturned. The ball didn't come and get secured until after the first plant came off the ground. 1 Quote
Ta111 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Had possession of ball before right foot came up. It’s a catch. Quote
Mikie2times Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Just now, mannc said: I think there is a rule in that situation… We should get the call, yes Quote
Goin Breakdown Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I think if slowed down giants may still be touching. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.