sherpa Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: I don't want to shake up the status quo. Why are you guys so obsessed with this? If you don't think there needs to be a refocusing in our military, you are not aware of the views of mid level officers and enlisted. 1
Pokebball Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: I don't want to shake up the status quo. Why are you guys so obsessed with this? While your opinion is fine, you didn't win the election. Trump ran on shaking up the status quo. It was a campaign promise. 1
BillsFanNC Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 Roundy wants to maintain the status quo: More embarrassments like Afghanistan withdrawal with zero accountability. And more of this:
Doc Posted January 15 Posted January 15 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: Tim Walz is more of a man than Hegseth will ever be, that's for sure. Trans, sure. 14 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Roundy wants to maintain the status quo: More embarrassments like Afghanistan withdrawal with zero accountability. And more of this: Of course they don't want to shake it up. Wanting to just admits that Biden's military leaders were a joke.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted January 15 Posted January 15 11 hours ago, Roundybout said: I note that you have not said one positive thing about Hegseth to me or given a reason why this clown is qualified for SOD. Luckily, your opinion means nothing. Cheers!
BillsFanNC Posted January 15 Author Posted January 15 🎯 ^10. Of course Roundy wants the status quo to remain. After being dead wrong about every 2024 election issue he's engaged in zero self reflection. The vast majority of the country wants DEI poison out of everything. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted January 15 Posted January 15 I am amazed that anyone can watch the hearing and come away with the thought that the Dems are hurting him. They have only stumped him by asking about economic issues, which are not under his direction at all. When it comes to the military he will make it stronger and better, standards will be maintained and the units will be filled with people who can do the job. 1
sherpa Posted January 15 Posted January 15 I fully expect there to be a bit of a rough patch here. The military, this past year, has been put into a position that is very likely to effect retention and recruiting. That has yet to play out, statistically, and it may be an issue for a couple years. Fixing that is going to take time, and I hope the press and the public understands that, as well as I hope the man is successful. While I don not blame the military for the Afghan withdrawal disaster, there are people in positions that could be replaced, and that is desirable. Biden was presented options by SECDEF and Chairman JCS for keeping Bagram Air Base opened and defended, and he, or whomever is running this thing refused, resulting in the embarrassing disaster. 2
JDHillFan Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Somewhat related. Pinheads like Tibs and Roundy are ok with it - unless Hegseth does the same. Embarrassing. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 15 Posted January 15 24 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: Somewhat related. Pinheads like Tibs and Roundy are ok with it - unless Hegseth does the same. Embarrassing. Having a rapist in charge is worse than having a cancer survivor in charge. Rapist drunk who is too stupid to manage money well, ya, great pick, if you hate the USA. This guy just wants to walk on the dead bodies and take credit from their service
JDHillFan Posted January 15 Posted January 15 9 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Having a rapist in charge is worse than having a cancer survivor in charge. Rapist drunk who is too stupid to manage money well, ya, great pick, if you hate the USA. This guy just wants to walk on the dead bodies and take credit from their service You are fine with unnecessarily increasing the risk to national security because the SecDef had the same cancer that hundreds of thousands of men deal with. The reason you are ok with it is because he’s a democrat. Absolutely pathetic.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 15 Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: You are fine with unnecessarily increasing the risk to national security because the SecDef had the same cancer that hundreds of thousands of men deal with. The reason you are ok with it is because he’s a democrat. Absolutely pathetic. Lloyd Austin was a good man. Your guy is a scum bag You support a scum bag. You must be a scum bag.
JDHillFan Posted January 15 Posted January 15 Just now, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Lloyd Austin was a good man. Your guy is a scum bag You support a scum bag. You must be a scum bag. I just hope the scumbag doesn’t unnecessarily increase the risk to national security like the good man. Can you imagine being so selfish as to put your own needs over that of national security? Very sad. At least he has two dipsh*ts out in the world willing to defend him.
Orlando Buffalo Posted January 15 Posted January 15 54 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Lloyd Austin was a good man. Your guy is a scum bag You support a scum bag. You must be a scum bag. Can you tell me why he is a scumbag that would make you not vote for Democrat? It seems all his issues are helpful to Dems to stay in office.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 hour ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Lloyd Austin was a good man. Your guy is a scum bag You support a scum bag. You must be a scum bag. This back and forth is silly, and I certainly don’t want to trash talk Lloyd Austin. Still, his decision to forgo advising his superiors of his absence is indicative of very poor judgement. His indifference at putting civilians at risk is also indicative of very poor judgment.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 15 Posted January 15 1 hour ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Can you tell me why he is a scumbag that would make you not vote for Democrat? It seems all his issues are helpful to Dems to stay in office. Huh? 32 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: This back and forth is silly, and I certainly don’t want to trash talk Lloyd Austin. Still, his decision to forgo advising his superiors of his absence is indicative of very poor judgement. His indifference at putting civilians at risk is also indicative of very poor judgment. This again? Yes, no one is denying the man made a mistake, please, just stop. You are piling on a good man to deflect from that unqualified punk who has no business going for the position. You are scapegoating Austin, who we all admit made a mistake. Derp if you do! Derp! <---u will
Recommended Posts