B-Man Posted February 20 Posted February 20 PLENTY OF DEADWOOD TO BE CLEARED: Hegseth set to remove generals and senior officers – report. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is reportedly preparing to fire a whole host of generals and officers, particularly those who were close to his disgrace of a predecessor, Lloyd Austin. The generals and officers up for termination are on a list pieced together by top Pentagon officials and shared this week with congressional Republicans, according to NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/live-blog/live-updates-trump-lori-chavez-deremer-cpac-rcna192744#rcrd73369 https://thedailybs.com/2025/02/20/hegseth-set-to-remove-generals-and-senior-officers-report/ 1
B-Man Posted March 10 Posted March 10 GOOD: Pete Hegseth Drives the Stake Through Climate Change Driving Defense Policy. The Department of Defense is abandoning its nearly two decades-long focus on climate change as a national security issue. In a terse message to CNN, Pentagon spokesman John Ullyot said, “Climate zealotry and other woke chimeras of the Left are not part of that core mission." This is a major change for the Department of Defense that goes back at least five administrations. For reasons I've never really understood, the military has been vulnerable to environazis for decades. At Fort (Braxton) Bragg, large swaths of training area were put off limits because they were allegedly the nesting grounds of the then-endangered (it had a status upgrade in December) red-cockaded woodpecker. A freakin woodpecker. An acquaintance of mine was relieved of his command because one of his troops had pasted a picture of the bird on a target on a rifle range (the 1,000-inch range), and the wrong person happened onto the scene. If you're wondering why US Navy ships compare unfavorably to Soviet trawlers, circa 1980, in terms of rust, it is because the best paint is environmentally friendly. {snip} If climate change is real, it will be addressed at home and abroad by agencies not called the Department of Defense. When the Defense encounters it, it will come in the form of weather and terrain; how we got there will be an academic exercise. Secretary Hegseth is right; his focus has to be on training troops, structuring forces, modernizing equipment, and building warrior spirit to win wars, something Defense has gotten out of the habit of doing over the last 41 years. https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/03/09/pete-hegseth-drives-the-stake-through-climate-change-driving-defense-policy-n2186468 . 1
Andy1 Posted Monday at 05:02 PM Posted Monday at 05:02 PM Remember, Trump only hires the vest and the brightest. It’s a clown show of Fox personalities. A reporter was included in a text group discussing the attack on the Houthi’s. 1
Roundybout Posted Monday at 05:19 PM Posted Monday at 05:19 PM 16 minutes ago, Andy1 said: Remember, Trump only hires the vest and the brightest. It’s a clown show of Fox personalities. A reporter was included in a text group discussing the attack on the Houthi’s. Hegseth was probably drunk again. What a goddamn embarrassment. Sucks that posts like this go right over the MAGAs heads because I’d love to see them defend this.
SectionC3 Posted Monday at 05:28 PM Posted Monday at 05:28 PM 8 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Hegseth was probably drunk again. What a goddamn embarrassment. Sucks that posts like this go right over the MAGAs heads because I’d love to see them defend this. 4D chess. Or "4-d" ounces of Silver Thunder. Probably the latter.
yall Posted Monday at 05:34 PM Posted Monday at 05:34 PM (edited) Unless this was some psy-op, this is absolutely inexcusable. Edit: although Tulsi is welcome to DM me nudes on any insecure channel that she pleases. Edited Monday at 05:41 PM by yall 1
JDHillFan Posted Monday at 05:39 PM Posted Monday at 05:39 PM 16 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Hegseth was probably drunk again. What a goddamn embarrassment. Sucks that posts like this go right over the MAGAs heads because I’d love to see them defend this. Just because a hyper-partisan such as yourself ran to the defense of Joe Biden, as he slept through the Chinese spy balloon event or carried water for Coach Tim as he lied about his military service doesn’t mean others have to rush to defend the indefensible. That’s your thing. 1
Roundybout Posted Monday at 05:42 PM Posted Monday at 05:42 PM 6 minutes ago, yall said: Unless this was some psy-op, this is absolutely inexcusable. White House said it’s real. 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Just because a hyper-partisan such as yourself ran to the defense of Joe Biden, as he slept through the Chinese spy balloon event or carried water for Coach Tim as he lied about his military service doesn’t mean others have to rush to defend the indefensible. That’s your thing. Im not really surprised you have to go back to whataboutism for this, and for the stupid debunked Tim Walz story of all things! It’s amazing how that man lives rent free in your head. 1
JDHillFan Posted Monday at 05:54 PM Posted Monday at 05:54 PM 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: White House said it’s real. Im not really surprised you have to go back to whataboutism for this, and for the stupid debunked Tim Walz story of all things! It’s amazing how that man lives rent free in your head. The gist of my post was to highlight the idiocy of you demanding a defense of the indefensible. Regarding your guy, Coach Tim, he is one of the most cartoonish political figures of my lifetime. It’s obviously embarrassing for you to have been polishing his helmet for months but you will recover. The only way any of those stories was debunked was when he had to admit to being a knucklehead or using poor grammar. 1
Recommended Posts