Roundybout Posted March 14 Posted March 14 10 minutes ago, ScotSHO said: I thought the constitution was a "living document" that needs different interpretations that keep up with modern times? Well that’s a non sequitur right there
The Frankish Reich Posted March 14 Posted March 14 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: That’s an absolutely atrocious interpretation of Article II. “Congress may, by Law, vest the Appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.” DOGE is a failure. Right. I don’t know if this Mike Davis is really that dumb a lawyer or whether he just thinks you’re all too dumb to realize this is flat out wrong.
Wacka Posted March 14 Posted March 14 9 hours ago, Doc said: As soon as Trump is for/against it, they’re automatically and immediately against/for it. 1 1
Roundybout Posted March 14 Posted March 14 4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: That’s cute. Did Obama hire George Soros and a force of coked out 20 year olds to eliminate jobs with no congressional approval?
JDHillFan Posted March 14 Author Posted March 14 19 minutes ago, Roundybout said: That’s cute. Did Obama hire George Soros and a force of coked out 20 year olds to eliminate jobs with no congressional approval? Any info on the success or lack thereof for “The Campaign to Cut Waste”?
Roundybout Posted March 14 Posted March 14 9 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Any info on the success or lack thereof for “The Campaign to Cut Waste”? You tell me, your side put the “point” forth. You back it up.
JDHillFan Posted March 14 Author Posted March 14 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: You tell me, your side put the “point” forth. You back it up. No thank you. I was just curious if you had any info. I never heard a word about results. Similar to Kamala’s border-czaring.
Roundybout Posted March 15 Posted March 15 14 hours ago, JDHillFan said: No thank you. I was just curious if you had any info. I never heard a word about results. Similar to Kamala’s border-czaring. Again, you tell me. You guys brought it up. Meanwhile, any thoughts on this? Not exactly beating the racism allegations
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted March 15 Posted March 15 25 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Again, you tell me. You guys brought it up. Meanwhile, any thoughts on this? Not exactly beating the racism allegations Keep going with the tired racism angle, it's clearly working!
Roundybout Posted March 15 Posted March 15 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Keep going with the tired racism angle, it's clearly working! Why is DOGE targeting the Obama library and a Civil Rights museum?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted March 15 Posted March 15 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why is DOGE targeting the Obama library and a Civil Rights museum? How does it make them racist? DOGE has plenty of targets beyond these two.
JDHillFan Posted March 15 Author Posted March 15 36 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Meanwhile, any thoughts on this? Yes. Shortsighted perhaps but not in any way related to racism. The racism card has long been played out but I think you should keep it in your go-to’s. One other thought - it’s not happening but don’t let that get in the way of anything. Lefty twitter has told you what to believe and you have swallowed it whole.
JDHillFan Posted March 15 Author Posted March 15 10 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why is DOGE targeting the Obama library and a Civil Rights museum? https://www.blackenterprise.com/obama-presidential-library-unfazed-by-doges-lease-cancellation/ The decision is not expected to significantly impact the center, as the lease was set to expire in 2025. As is customary for a former president, the building housed memorabilia of historic and cultural significance collected during the Obama administration. According to the Chicago Tribune, the current site, owned by Hoffman Estates Medical LLC, was a 73,000-square-foot former furniture store. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) paid $1.4 million annually to rent the space. Don’t let the details derail you. If you would like to donate to the under-construction library, you can do so here: https://www.obamalibrary.gov/about-us/you-can-support-the-library 1
Roundybout Posted March 15 Posted March 15 33 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: https://www.blackenterprise.com/obama-presidential-library-unfazed-by-doges-lease-cancellation/ The decision is not expected to significantly impact the center, as the lease was set to expire in 2025. As is customary for a former president, the building housed memorabilia of historic and cultural significance collected during the Obama administration. According to the Chicago Tribune, the current site, owned by Hoffman Estates Medical LLC, was a 73,000-square-foot former furniture store. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) paid $1.4 million annually to rent the space. Don’t let the details derail you. If you would like to donate to the under-construction library, you can do so here: https://www.obamalibrary.gov/about-us/you-can-support-the-library If the lease is going to expire this year then why is DOGE crowing about it being some big savings? Also they got caught lying again.
JDHillFan Posted March 15 Author Posted March 15 17 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If the lease is going to expire this year then why is DOGE crowing about it being some big savings? Can you show where DOGE is crowing about big savings as it specifically relates to the BHO library storage facility/furniture warehouse? Or is that simply an exaggeration on your part? 1
Roundybout Posted March 15 Posted March 15 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Can you show where DOGE is crowing about big savings as it specifically relates to the BHO library storage facility/furniture warehouse? Or is that simply an exaggeration on your part? Every single DOGE tweet is about all the CORRUPTION and WASTE it's finding. And yet, when you actually look at the details - it's neither.
JDHillFan Posted March 15 Author Posted March 15 45 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Every single DOGE tweet is about all the CORRUPTION and WASTE it's finding. And yet, when you actually look at the details - it's neither. All you had to do was say no in response. It’s clear you were talking out your ass. Again.
Recommended Posts