Roundybout Posted yesterday at 01:44 AM Posted yesterday at 01:44 AM 59 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Interesting. You have advocated for censorship previously. I’ve said I wished Twitter would stop platforming neonazis. But my original point was that @BillsFanNC gushed about Elon’s free speech platform, to which I responded he bans people quite often and Trump is threatening people who criticize Elon.
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 01:50 AM Posted yesterday at 01:50 AM As a side note, holy cow this man is drugged out of his mind
4th&long Posted yesterday at 02:50 AM Posted yesterday at 02:50 AM Elon Musk Is Such a Garbage-Tier Dad That His Kids Find Out About Their New Siblings While Browsing Reddit https://flip.it/6MflnH
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 01:46 PM Posted yesterday at 01:46 PM Im so glad DOGE is slashing arts and sciences so we can have fewer incredible breakthroughs like this
JDHillFan Posted yesterday at 01:49 PM Author Posted yesterday at 01:49 PM 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Im so glad DOGE is slashing arts and sciences so we can have fewer incredible breakthroughs like this Is this satire? 1
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 01:50 PM Posted yesterday at 01:50 PM Just now, JDHillFan said: Is this satire? https://www.newsweek.com/nasa-layoffs-workforce-donald-trump-doge-admin-cuts-2032981
JDHillFan Posted yesterday at 01:54 PM Author Posted yesterday at 01:54 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: https://www.newsweek.com/nasa-layoffs-workforce-donald-trump-doge-admin-cuts-2032981 The layoffs—reportedly affecting probationary employees and those accepting buyouts, according to ArsTechnica a non-issue. Study up on the spacecraft already in-service, ready for launch, in production and in development and then come back to whine about the 1000 probies let go at NASA. 🤦🏽🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♀️
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted yesterday at 01:55 PM Posted yesterday at 01:55 PM 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: https://www.newsweek.com/nasa-layoffs-workforce-donald-trump-doge-admin-cuts-2032981 Bloated government only hurts the tax payers. Thanks for your concern.
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 01:58 PM Posted yesterday at 01:58 PM 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: The layoffs—reportedly affecting probationary employees and those accepting buyouts, according to ArsTechnica a non-issue. Study up on the spacecraft already in-service, ready for launch, in production and in development and then come back to whine about the 1000 probies let go at NASA. 🤦🏽🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♀️ No one should be let go. NASA, NHS, etc should be given additional funding to explore the sciences. Human beings were put here to explore and create. 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Bloated government only hurts the tax payers. Thanks for your concern. You’re still paying those taxes my man
JDHillFan Posted yesterday at 02:05 PM Author Posted yesterday at 02:05 PM 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: No one should be let go. NASA, NHS, etc should be given additional funding to explore the sciences. Human beings were put here to explore and create. And explore they will. Just with a few less people. I imagine that $2 billion that went to the Stacey Abrams climate front organization would’ve been better spent at NASA. Then again probably not. They’ve never met a schedule or a budget.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted yesterday at 02:32 PM Posted yesterday at 02:32 PM trump train is rolling steeply downhill. The people are speaking. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/21/politics/video/rich-mccormick-town-hall-trump-power-digvid 1
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 02:33 PM Posted yesterday at 02:33 PM 27 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: And explore they will. Just with a few less people. I imagine that $2 billion that went to the Stacey Abrams climate front organization would’ve been better spent at NASA. Then again probably not. They’ve never met a schedule or a budget. And yet, here we are with pictures of the Mars sunset in 4k on our phones.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted yesterday at 03:30 PM Posted yesterday at 03:30 PM 56 minutes ago, Roundybout said: And yet, here we are with pictures of the Mars sunset in 4k on our phones. More efficiently = less spending. What is so difficult to understand?
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 03:32 PM Posted yesterday at 03:32 PM 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: More efficiently = less spending. What is so difficult to understand? More like less safety lmao
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted yesterday at 03:34 PM Posted yesterday at 03:34 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: More like less safety lmao No.
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 04:58 PM Posted yesterday at 04:58 PM 1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: No. Great debate there
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted yesterday at 05:10 PM Posted yesterday at 05:10 PM 11 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Great debate there Not worth the time. 1
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 07:16 PM Posted yesterday at 07:16 PM 2 hours ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Not worth the time. Yes, the 30 seconds it would take you to say “yes, firing the head of the Nuclear Safety Administration is bad.”
Recommended Posts