JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 02:06 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 02:06 PM 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Create a Senate committee! Get the Inspector General to do it! That’s how it’s typically done. https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3967009/department-of-defense-completes-seventh-consecutive-department-wide-financial-s/#:~:text=Teams of independent public accountants,Department and its reporting entities. Audits happen all the time. You just haven’t paid attention because you weren’t programmed to be mad yet. Business as usual in other words. That should work. Good thinking. 1
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 02:09 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:09 PM 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Business as usual in other words. That should work. Good thinking. Correct. As we’ve discussed, I support our institutions. You do not. If DOGE was doing such a great job, why are they desperately crowdsourcing “fraud” now
JFKjr Posted Tuesday at 02:11 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:11 PM So far the Dems/libs have you embracing illegal immigration, trans in bathrooms and women's sports, 'gender affirming' (body destroying) 'care' for minors, a war in Ukraine that is a front for money laundering/biolabs/human trafficking, medical experimentation on the American people (covid jabs), and now massive corruption with government funds. Just wondering how much more the Swampsters will get you to defend before you realize how ridiculous you look. 1
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 02:13 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 02:13 PM Just now, Roundybout said: Correct. As we’ve discussed, I support our institutions. You do not. Correct. I suspect many to most will be shown to be anywhere from incredibly inefficient to corrupt. Nobody is telling you not to put your faith in the creatures of Washington DC in charge of our institutions. They could never be corrupted by power.
Doc Posted Tuesday at 02:16 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:16 PM 17 minutes ago, Roundybout said: A long-time finance/federal affairs journalist? I reckon he knows what he’s talking about. Would you prefer someone with the handle “ MAGAPATRIOT47” and a profile picture of an AI-generated gorilla wearing sunglasses? Weissmann? The guy who said the border crisis might be a boon for the economy? Let me guess which party he belongs to...
Westside Posted Tuesday at 02:17 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:17 PM 20 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Lock her up!
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 02:29 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:29 PM 13 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Correct. I suspect many to most will be shown to be anywhere from incredibly inefficient to corrupt. Nobody is telling you not to put your faith in the creatures of Washington DC in charge of our institutions. They could never be corrupted by power. I’m not holding my breath. They haven’t identified ANY fraud yet. Just “stuff Elon doesn’t like.”
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 02:35 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 02:35 PM 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I’m not holding my breath. They haven’t identified ANY fraud yet. Just “stuff Elon doesn’t like.” You have a gift for distilling things down to a single talking point. Sadly, it’s always a dimwitted and childish talking point. 2
Homelander Posted Tuesday at 02:46 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:46 PM 1 hour ago, Doc said: "Major American companies pay little in income tax. Film at 11." Never mind that it's a successful company employs tens of thousands across the globe. Why do you think Tesla got significant tax subsidies and grants? I'll give you a hint: you libs loved Tesla...until Musk bought Twitter and took it from you. So much for draining the swamp.
JFKjr Posted Tuesday at 02:47 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:47 PM 14 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I’m not holding my breath. They haven’t identified ANY fraud yet. Just “stuff Elon doesn’t like.” The amazing part is no one's paying you to say that. Just don't read too fast from the cue cards, you never know what they'll have you say next. 1
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 02:47 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:47 PM 11 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You have a gift for distilling things down to a single talking point. Sadly, it’s always a dimwitted and childish talking point. Okay, what “fraud” has been identified? Be specific and explain how it is fraud.
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Okay, what “fraud” has been identified? Be specific and explain how it is fraud. I am not part of a generation that demands immediate gratification and emotionally overreacts when they don’t get it. I’m willing to hold steady and wait for some details. I will join you in crucifying everyone that comes up short in this endeavor.
Doc Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:52 PM 6 minutes ago, Homelander said: So much for draining the swamp. So Musk is now part of the swamp?
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 02:55 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:55 PM 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I am not part of a generation that demands immediate gratification and emotionally overreacts when they don’t get it. I’m willing to hold steady and wait for some details. I will join you in crucifying everyone that comes up short in this endeavor. Okay, if there is no fraud identified yet, what’s with all the firings? Why is Elon constantly declaring that every day is a new scandal?
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 03:05 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 03:05 PM 8 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Okay, if there is no fraud identified yet, what’s with all the firings? Why is Elon constantly declaring that every day is a new scandal? Elections have consequences. A reimagining of government is underway. Had your party not completely sh*t the bed things might be different. I suspect your side will have a chance to put the brakes on it one year and 11 months from now.
Albwan Posted Tuesday at 03:05 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:05 PM (edited) I'm not one to just believe everything I read but man if this is true, our government is the actual new mafia. Edited Tuesday at 03:11 PM by Albwan 1 1
Homelander Posted Tuesday at 03:15 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:15 PM 11 minutes ago, Doc said: So Musk is now part of the swamp? Was this put out to bid? Doesn't this seem like the epitome of swamp politics? It's highly inappropriate. Wake up 1
Recommended Posts