Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

His defense/foreign policy team. Engineering a coordinated NATO response to Russian aggression was no mean feat. Other countries did things I never thought they'd be willing to do, including Sweden's accession.

If there’s one thing that will put Joe on Mount Rushmore, it’s his defense/foreign policy team. 
 

Good heavens man. Are you serious? Even giving credit for a coordinated NATO response you are impressed with these people? Were you awake for the Afghanistan debacle? The entire Middle East disaster? The floating pier? Removing the Houthi’s from the terrorist list? Funding UNRWA? Relieving sanctions on Iran? This is the group that impressed you most? Yikes. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

 

 

The US Treasury Spent HOW MUCH Illegally?

Now You Know Why the Left Wants to Stop DOGE.

 

cb330b1d-b012-49e0-8973-b944e15b99a4-105

 

Congress illegally spent at least $516 billion in 2024 on programs for which there was no authorization. Yes, billion, with a "b."  A stunning report by the Congressional Budget Office underscores the reason for the legal assault upon President Trump's right to audit payments by the Treasury Department.

 

In a report titled "Expired and Expiring Authorizations of Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024," the CBO observes: "Historically, House and Senate rules restrict lawmakers from considering an appropriation if it lacks a current authorization." Nevertheless, "CBO estimates that $516 billion was appropriated for 2024 for activities with expired authorizations, which the agency identified for each House and Senate authorizing committee and appropriations subcommittee." That $516 billion in illegal payments cover "1,264 authorizations of appropriations that expired before the beginning of fiscal year 2024 and 251 authorizations of appropriations that were set to expire by the end of fiscal year 2024." The legal authority for some of these payments expired 40 — that's not a typo — years ago.

 

{snip}

 

 

Making this all the more intriguing is that it would seem that the President could stop those payments without worrying about violating the Impoundment Control Act as they are not legal appropriations by Congress's rules.

 

I will guarantee you that when DOGE really digs into this, they are going to find other ongoing illegal payments on a Biblical scale.

 

https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/02/08/the-us-treasury-spent-how-much-illegally-now-you-know-why-the-left-wants-to-stop-doge-n2185365

 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Can you imagine if trump balances the budget? Or gets a surplus? Dems would be cooked

The headlines in the reliable mainstream media would read “Why a Balanced Budget May Be Bad for America”. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

The headlines in the reliable mainstream media would read “Why a Balanced Budget May Be Bad for America”. 

 

The US having a surplus would be positioned as "Trump hoards Millions in treasury! How Americans could lose ALL of their social services."

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
Posted
2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Can you imagine if trump balances the budget? Or gets a surplus? Dems would be cooked

It’s the greatest challenge there is right now. Fat chance it happens but hope he can get it back on the right track

Posted
24 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Not mentioned in the CNN link - Russia or Putin. 
 

Not mentioned in the yahoo link - Putin. Russia is mentioned in this context:

 

The executive order also said South Africa had taken an anti-American stance — even “led the charge” — on many issues, accusing it of supporting Hamas, Russia and Iran, and being too close to China's ruling Communist Party.

 

That you make it about PUTIN is testament to your deep thinking. Yes, that’s sarcasm. You’re such a dumbass. Amazing. 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

The executive order also said South Africa had taken an anti-American stance — even “led the charge” — on many issues, accusing it of supporting Hamas, Russia and Iran, and being too close to China's ruling Communist Party.

See the bolded part?  but it's complicated.  You wouldn't understand.  try to connect some dots.  let me know your thoughts.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/6/2/a-russian-love-affair-why-south-africa-stays-neutral-on-war

Posted
On 2/6/2025 at 7:49 PM, Doc said:

 

Because he doesn't need DOGE to do what you said.  He's already made himself the richest man in history without it.  And he's defied critics in everything he's done.

 

To these mega billionaires enough is never enough. They need more always.  He can't be satisfied to have the biggest company, it has to be bigger than the next 5 put together.  And having President Trump in your back pocket helps.

 

The other thing I think he's angling for is NASA to pay for his trip to Mars.  I've heard President Trump talk about it a few times.

Posted
5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Why weren't these  requirements being followed in President Trump's 1st term or W's 2nd term?

 

The Bush family fits right in with the rest of them.

 

Re: Trump I think it's evident he had huge battles to fight vis a vis Democratic lawfare, impeachment, fake dossier etc. Not to mention as a NON-politician he had to figure out how the system worked. He was embattled in his first term. In the interim, with Biden serving, he's had time to gather his forces and assemble a team.

 

Trump & Musk (and their teams) are exposing it all. They're obviously not doing it to continue the grift. Maybe that's why it takes billionaires with a vision to get anything done. They cannot be bought off. (although the Trump assassination attempt was clearly aided by the Deepstaters)

 

How about THIS grifter: (top photo is person sharing the report, it's about SAMANTHA POWER, lower photo)

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...