JFKjr Posted Sunday at 12:54 PM Posted Sunday at 12:54 PM 9 hours ago, Roundybout said: Competent leadership would have coordinated this beforehand, without a need for a release like that Yes we remember the good old days of competent leadership. 1 1 1
Roundybout Posted Sunday at 01:29 PM Posted Sunday at 01:29 PM 9 hours ago, Pokebball said: Dems stalled and stalled and stalled re confirming our head of the fbi though? Not remotely the same thing.
Pokebball Posted Sunday at 04:16 PM Posted Sunday at 04:16 PM 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: Not remotely the same thing. I was most certain you weren't going to think so 1
Roundybout Posted Sunday at 04:56 PM Posted Sunday at 04:56 PM 20 minutes ago, B-Man said: . Who is going to read three million emails?
Doc Posted Sunday at 04:58 PM Posted Sunday at 04:58 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Who is going to read three million emails? I'm assuming no one. Just seeing who responds. 1
JDHillFan Posted Sunday at 05:25 PM Author Posted Sunday at 05:25 PM This is Roundy’s list from last week. He was certainly not providing value to the citizens during working hours. In fairness, he may have been settling on another house. 1
Roundybout Posted Sunday at 08:32 PM Posted Sunday at 08:32 PM 3 hours ago, JDHillFan said: This is Roundy’s list from last week. He was certainly not providing value to the citizens during working hours. In fairness, he may have been settling on another house. I’m just worried you’ll miss me! 1
The Frankish Reich Posted Sunday at 09:50 PM Posted Sunday at 09:50 PM 11 minutes ago, IrishLass said: Total bs. If there's one thing any lazy-ass worker - federal government, state government, private company, whatever - does, it's check email, if only to make sure your boss isn't looking for you and trying to make a record of your absence. 1
Doc Posted Sunday at 11:07 PM Posted Sunday at 11:07 PM 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Huh. They never cared before that their data was being looked at by unelected people. Or they didn't know. Now they do. 1 1
Steve O Posted Sunday at 11:59 PM Posted Sunday at 11:59 PM 7 hours ago, B-Man said: Do those in the middle of a 2 month paternity leave still have to provide the bullet points? 2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Total bs. If there's one thing any lazy-ass worker - federal government, state government, private company, whatever - does, it's check email, if only to make sure your boss isn't looking for you and trying to make a record of your absence. Frankish does have a point here.
Roundybout Posted Monday at 03:17 PM Posted Monday at 03:17 PM 15 hours ago, B-Man said: Elon has absolutely no evidence for this and is making stuff up on another of his drug-fueled Twitter tirades. “Non-existent people” collecting paychecks is a bafflingly stupid notion. None of these offices are coordinating with him.
B-Man Posted Monday at 04:30 PM Posted Monday at 04:30 PM More at https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/02/24/alexandria-brown-thread-federal-employees-going-back-to-the-office-n2408860 1
B-Man Posted Monday at 05:43 PM Posted Monday at 05:43 PM LET THE SUNSHINE IN DOGE Might Hold the Key to Opening up All of Washington's Dirtiest Secrets Stephen Green A confidential source of Data Republican (Small-r)'s reveals that a PATRIOT Act provision meant to track terrorists' funds could prove to be a goldmine of information about NGO funding — and that might be the real reason Washington is so afraid of Elon Musk and his DOGE boys. "One of the lasting impacts of the PATRIOT Act," Data R posted her source informed her, "is its requirement for financial institutions to report all transactions over [$10,000 (listed as $3,000 in Data R's original post but quickly corrected)] to the U.S. Treasury—a threshold that has never been adjusted for inflation." The Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is in charge of processing all that data and going after the bad guys or whoever. But that's where things get weird, according to Data R's source. Stick a pin in that thought for a moment because you need to know a little more about how reporting works. It's also a crime to "structure" deposits and transfers to get under the $10,000 cap. If Ahmed al-Terrorlover makes several $9,900 wire transfers, that could be construed as a financial crime — even if the transfers are 100% not terror-related. Ahmed could be buying Puppy Chow for homeless dogs and still be guilty of structuring. Banks look for suspicious activities, however innocuous they might be, and report them to FinCEN. So it's always been my assumption that reporting includes anyone with more than just a checking account that approaches zero right before payday. https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2025/02/24/washingtons-dirty-little-secret-might-be-what-they-let-the-banks-do-for-them-n4937272 . 1
Recommended Posts