SectionC3 Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Lmao, your not worth it. All the best. Apparently you felt the same way about your elementary school grammar class. LMAO! 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, Motorin' said: No you freaking dolt, there's a special place in hell for people using their self-proclaimed expert status to deny the sinister nature of the bio-weapon that was released upon humanity. Your opinion and $3 will buy a coffee at McDonalds (they’ll charge extra). In contrast, I was paid fairly well for my medical opinion
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 17 Posted February 17 9 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Apparently you felt the same way about your elementary school grammar class. LMAO! Huge burn.
B-Man Posted February 17 Posted February 17 51 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Do you support the Covid vaccine that Trump created using Operation Warp Speed? Wrong thread. But you knew that. .
Motorin' Posted February 17 Posted February 17 9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Your opinion and $3 will buy a coffee at McDonalds (they’ll charge extra). In contrast, I was paid fairly well for my medical opinion It's not my option you human paraquat. It's the actual science, that actual scientists have gone into great lengths explaining why COVID 19 had to have been created in a lab. And the only thing that you offer is appeal to authority. Not one single attempt to refute the science. 1
Roundybout Posted February 17 Posted February 17 16 minutes ago, B-Man said: Wrong thread. But you knew that. . No no. If it was truly a deadly Chinese bioweapon, then it would follow that he supports Trump’s Warp Speed vaccine and all the other mitigation efforts enforced.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 17 Posted February 17 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Motorin' said: It's not my option you human paraquat. It's the actual science, that actual scientists have gone into great lengths explaining why COVID 19 had to have been created in a lab. And the only thing that you offer is appeal to authority. Not one single attempt to refute the science. the actual science? actually? There is no consensus on the origin by the scientific community. But you maga's just know better. magical thinking sucks..morons pretending to think sucks worse. Edited February 17 by Joe Ferguson forever
Doc Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, K D said: And probably 200M of those 334M aren't on and/or eligible for SS. 1
Motorin' Posted February 17 Posted February 17 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: the actual science? actually? There is no consensus on the origin by the scientific community. But you maga's just know better. magical thinking sucks..morons pretending to think sucks worse. Hell
JDHillFan Posted February 17 Author Posted February 17 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: magical thinking sucks..morons pretending to think sucks worse. From the person that hit submit reply on this gem: On 3/6/2023 at 3:15 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said: I've seen it 100's of times. I don't believe he has any cognitive impairment. His speech has been abnormal his entire life. by all accounts, it has actually improved. gait and facial expressions abnormalities are more suggestive of Parkinsons but I don't see those characteristic changes either and he has no tremor.
JustAnotherBillsFan Posted February 17 Posted February 17 3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I've been around many scientists for most of my adult life. I can think of only one that I would consider intellectually dishonest. Not looking to enter the larger food fight, just wanted to mention in my 20+ years in research at a fortune 500 company I have seen many intellectually dishonest scientists. Not many would admit to it of course. Quite common for them to put their thumb on the scale to make the idea they were proposing look more promising(and therefore more likely to receive funding). Also saw similar behavior from my advisor while obtaining my MS degree. Doesn't mean it happens everywhere but in my experience it has not been rare. 1 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 17 Posted February 17 11 minutes ago, Motorin' said: Hell Silly, loathsome maga…
JaCrispy Posted February 17 Posted February 17 3 hours ago, Roundybout said: Bureaucracy supports democracy. Without a functioning government apparatus, you have anarchy. Haha…Of course you would support lifetime unelected officials, who are never held to account, to make decisions for you…because democracy? 🤣🤣🤣 I think you just said the quiet part out loud by accident, because it makes you sound pretty dumb…
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 17 Posted February 17 (edited) 9 minutes ago, JustAnotherBillsFan said: Not looking to enter the larger food fight, just wanted to mention in my 20+ years in research at a fortune 500 company I have seen many intellectually dishonest scientists. Not many would admit to it of course. Quite common for them to put their thumb on the scale to make the idea they were proposing look more promising(and therefore more likely to receive funding). Also saw similar behavior from my advisor while obtaining my MS degree. Doesn't mean it happens everywhere but in my experience it has not been rare. I worked in 2 graduate science departments while doing an MS and MD. Also did some independent research at another major university. As you are no doubt aware, you get to know most of the faculty and grad students within a department very well through symposia, lectures, dissertation presentations etc. My wife also is a graduate level scientist. We certainly met some strange and unusual characters. As they say, genius is often borderline insanity. But I know of only one faculty member who fudged results and no grad students. Could I just be unaware of some? Sure. Edited February 17 by Joe Ferguson forever
Motorin' Posted February 17 Posted February 17 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Silly, loathsome maga… Nurse Ratched. Edited February 17 by Motorin'
B-Man Posted February 17 Posted February 17 33 minutes ago, Roundybout said: No no. If it was truly a deadly Chinese bioweapon, then it would follow that he supports Trump’s Warp Speed vaccine and all the other mitigation efforts enforced. Wrong Existence. Back to the DOGE thread.
JaCrispy Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, K D said: The Left looks so stupid for opposing the exposing of corruption 1 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 17 Posted February 17 23 minutes ago, Motorin' said: Nurse Ratched. Wondering what "Dr" Ford Pinto thinks of this https://www.science.org/content/article/virologists-and-epidemiologists-back-natural-origin-covid-19-survey-suggests
Motorin' Posted February 17 Posted February 17 46 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Wondering what "Dr" Ford Pinto thinks of this https://www.science.org/content/article/virologists-and-epidemiologists-back-natural-origin-covid-19-survey-suggests The meta-analysis of conflict of influence research is very clear. Those closest to areas of conflict are the least likely to be able to their biases. So it's the least surprising thing in the world that virologists would survey strongly against a lab leak theory, due to the proximity of their biases. Meanwhile, the science is damning: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/03/opinion/covid-lab-leak.html?smid=nytcore-android-share 1
Recommended Posts