SoonerBillsFan Posted February 5 Posted February 5 17 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Deply the military. There will be a few that get locked up for this bs. 1
daz28 Posted February 5 Posted February 5 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: I’ve seen some on both sides of the aisle say as much but it doesn’t sound like a slam dunk at all. If it was so clear cut I would think any number of anti-orange judges would have stepped in by now. What are your legal bona fides that would lead you to all-caps and punctuate in triplicate? It’s ok if you want to be specific rather than speak in generalities. Don't mess with the Constitution, and I expect ALL people who are hard core 2nd Amendment followers to be all caps triple angry, too. Is it a pre-requisite that a judge, who feels the Constitution isn't being honored, be anti-trump? I'm sure they'll get to that one soon. Here's an update on the ones they're already doing: Feb 4 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from implementing the Republican's executive order requiring all transgender women be housed in federal prisons for men and ending their access to gender-affirming care. (Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration offered “no rationale” for cutting off potentially trillions of dollars in federal funding of grants, loans and other financial assistance to recipients nationwide with less than 24 hours notice to conduct an ideological review, a judge said. US District Judge Loren AliKhan in Washington on Monday denied a request by the White House Office of Management and Budget to dismiss a suit filed by a national group of nonprofits challenging the funding freeze. She also granted the group’s request for a temporary restraining order against the freeze, the second such ruling in less than a week. 4 minutes ago, Homelander said: BUT HER EMAILS! More like butterface.
JFKjr Posted February 5 Posted February 5 (edited) 14 hours ago, Homelander said: BUT HER EMAILS! That will ALSO be dealt with. Back door to the Chinese. We haven't forgotten, and Trump will surely get to that too! Edited February 5 by JFKjr 1 2
Roundybout Posted February 5 Posted February 5 10 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Correct. Making sure the IRS is well funded is a crucial part of ensuring everyone is paying their fair share. 14 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Clint seems like the kind of guy well suited to pounding hammers at the quarry all day long.
Homelander Posted February 5 Posted February 5 5 hours ago, JFKjr said: That will ALSO be dealt with. Back door to the Chinese. We haven't forgotten, and Trump will surely get to that too! Sure. 1
B-Man Posted February 5 Posted February 5 The only reason the Left is in high dudgeon over DOGE and USAID is because, for a change, it is their proverbial ox that's being gored. That's it. They have no problem using the full weight of the federal government to go after Americans who fail to report their $600 Venmo transaction, but the billions -- nay, trillions -- of our tax dollars that they waste? Rep. Jim Jordan sums up the Democrats' priorities in one perfect post: https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2025/02/05/jim-jordan-sums-up-lefts-priorities-on-doge-audits-n2407889 1
K D Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Here you go...$84 million in funds being funneled to the Clintons! They need to hire PR people to put this info out. People should be demanding they be in jail. This is wild and it's only the beginning. Wow indeed!
B-Man Posted February 6 Posted February 6 DOGE isn’t looking into the records of Americans, it’s auditing government spending of our tax dollars. Stop fear-mongering . 1
njbuff Posted February 6 Posted February 6 Demonrats have shown EXACTLY how mentally ill they truly are. Very disturbing. 1
Roundybout Posted February 6 Posted February 6 8 minutes ago, B-Man said: DOGE isn’t looking into the records of Americans, it’s auditing government spending of our tax dollars. Stop fear-mongering . Where is the fraud? “Money spent on stuff I don’t like” is not fraud. 1
njbuff Posted February 6 Posted February 6 10 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Where is the fraud? “Money spent on stuff I don’t like” is not fraud. Ridiculous spending nonetheless.
Recommended Posts