JMM Posted November 12 Posted November 12 Did Mcd have any update on his injury today? I can't seem to find anything on it. Quote
Simon Posted November 12 Posted November 12 1 minute ago, JMM said: Did Mcd have any update on his injury today? I can't seem to find anything on it. I think he said something along the lines of We'll see how the next couple days go for him. 2 1 1 2 1 1 Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted Tuesday at 04:06 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:06 AM 13 minutes ago, Maynard said: I don't see the humor in this. 1 1 5 Quote
BADOLBILZ Posted Tuesday at 04:23 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:23 AM 51 minutes ago, JMM said: Did Mcd have any update on his injury today? I can't seem to find anything on it. There was an NFL twitter MD who said it looked like Kincaid suffered a PCL sprain which is generally a 1-3 week injury. So I am anticipating more action to Knox and more 11 personnel Sunday. 2 Quote
DCofNC Posted Tuesday at 04:49 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:49 AM Expected to miss 3 catches and 28 yards on Sunday. 13 Quote
Back2Buff Posted Tuesday at 12:19 PM Posted Tuesday at 12:19 PM 11 minutes ago, Blackbeard said: Knox needs to step up The team is better with just Knox in lineup. Knox can actually block, and is able to catch the 3 balls that Kincaid catches. 1 6 Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted Tuesday at 01:55 PM Posted Tuesday at 01:55 PM I’m honestly not worried at all if Kincaid can’t go, Knox has looked pretty good in his insanely limited opportunities. 1 1 Quote
Man with No Name Posted Tuesday at 02:14 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:14 PM sure. knox is not dropping balls as much this year, and Kincaid is has been less than we hoped for. might move the defensive attention around a little different than we're used to though. 1 Quote
The Jokeman Posted Tuesday at 02:16 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:16 PM 19 minutes ago, TheyCallMeAndy said: I’m honestly not worried at all if Kincaid can’t go, Knox has looked pretty good in his insanely limited opportunities. The problem is Knox isn't as consistent as Kincaid. 1 Quote
boater Posted Tuesday at 02:34 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:34 PM 2 hours ago, Back2Buff said: The team is better with just Knox in lineup. Knox can actually block, and is able to catch the 3 balls that Kincaid catches. I remember the early years when Knox had the dropsies. Then one off-season he went to a "hands coach" and that turned him around. Quote
Back2Buff Posted Tuesday at 02:35 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:35 PM 16 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: The problem is Knox isn't as consistent as Kincaid. In what area? In blocking, Knox is night and day more consistent than Kincaid. In terms of target vs reception, Knox has caught 10 of his 16 targets (62.5%), while Kincaid has caught 34 of his 59 targets (58%). 2 1 Quote
Utah John Posted Tuesday at 03:14 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:14 PM Kincaid is much more respected as a receiver than Knox. When Kincaid is in the game, the openings for other receivers are better. And when Kincaid is targeted, he's much more likely to make the catch. Overall, the difference between what the two TEs bring to the field is more, what can each guy do, instead of, is one guy clearly better to have on the team. If the Bills have their other pass catchers available, the absence of Kincaid (if it goes that way) against the Chiefs won't matter all that much. But that assumes Coleman and Cooper are both back. It was no accident that Josh's passing efficiency went down against the Colts, when he didn't have his best receivers. The KC game is a milestone for the Bills but it's not what makes or breaks their season. The Bills are good enough to beat KC in KC in the playoffs if it comes to that, and they're also able to lose to KC at home, as we saw last year. It is NOT worth putting any player's long-term health at risk to improve the odds for this one game. 2 2 Quote
appoo Posted Tuesday at 03:21 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:21 PM 3 hours ago, Back2Buff said: The team is better with just Knox in lineup. Knox can actually block, and is able to catch the 3 balls that Kincaid catches. No dude 2 1 1 Quote
JP51 Posted Tuesday at 03:25 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:25 PM Certainly Knox can fill in and do so respectably, but lets face it, Defenses dont shift coverage to Knox like Kincaid. 4 1 Quote
BillsFan130 Posted Tuesday at 03:26 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:26 PM 49 minutes ago, Back2Buff said: In what area? In blocking, Knox is night and day more consistent than Kincaid. In terms of target vs reception, Knox has caught 10 of his 16 targets (62.5%), while Kincaid has caught 34 of his 59 targets (58%). Here's the problem with stats: Kincaid of course draws tougher assignments and the defence keys in on him- I'm sure you would Agree to acknowledge that. And 16 targets compared to 59. If Knox had 59 targets, his efficiency of course will go down. Is Knox a better blocker? Yes. Is he a better route runner with better hands? Not even close 3 Quote
GASabresIUFan Posted Tuesday at 03:29 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:29 PM There was stat in the Sunday broadcast that Kincaid is 8th all time in receptions by a TE in his first 25 games. That’s a good way to start a career. 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.