Jump to content

Week 10, Bills v. Colts, GAME BALLS!


Freddie's Dead

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I can't. He is physically outmatched every week and so he gets taken advantage of some. But in terms of knowing his responsibility and being in the right place I have a ton of respect for him. I don't think he is a starting talent. But that isn't his fault. It is Brandon Beane's that we are having to start him.

no. wrong.  Beane went and got Mike Edwards, who got injured and then (from what I understand to be inside info) inexplicably turned out to be a head case and locker room cancer because the coaches wanted  him to compete for the job.  OP is wrong, Beane did his job and then the player lost his mind to the point he had to be cut.   Call it "Diggs Syndrome". 

Edited by ProcessTruster
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ProcessTruster said:

no. wrong.  Beane went and got Mike Edwards, who got injured and then inexplicably turned out to be a head case and locker room cancer because the coaches wanted  him to compete for the job.  OP is wrong, Beane did his job and then the player lost his mind to the point he had to be cut.   Call it "Diggs Syndrome". 

 

They got a little bit unlucky with Edwards, sure. But he is a backup level player anyway.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, ProcessTruster said:

no. wrong.  Beane went and got Mike Edwards, who got injured and then (from what I understand to be inside info) inexplicably turned out to be a head case and locker room cancer because the coaches wanted  him to compete for the job.  OP is wrong, Beane did his job and then the player lost his mind to the point he had to be cut.   Call it "Diggs Syndrome". 

I think they also looked at Edwards as a place holder until Bishop got up to speed. That hasn’t happened yet.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CincyBillsFan said:

Are you serious about Allen?  I don't care that he had 2 bad INT's which only led to 3 points.  The drives he orchestrated at the end of the 1st half and at the end of the game were masterful.  Both drives started at the 10 and in the 2nd drive Allen had to overcome TWO holding penalties.  Those 10 points were the difference.

 

 

 

I said he did enough to retain them.  But absent his rushing TD?  Tough call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I can't. He is physically outmatched every week and so he gets taken advantage of some. But in terms of knowing his responsibility and being in the right place I have a ton of respect for him. I don't think he is a starting talent. But that isn't his fault. It is Brandon Beane's that we are having to start him.

 

3 hours ago, ProcessTruster said:

no. wrong.  Beane went and got Mike Edwards, who got injured and then (from what I understand to be inside info) inexplicably turned out to be a head case and locker room cancer because the coaches wanted  him to compete for the job.  OP is wrong, Beane did his job and then the player lost his mind to the point he had to be cut.   Call it "Diggs Syndrome". 


I don’t put the safety position on Beane either. He took Cole Bishop at 60, along with Edwards. McD had options, and he’s riding with Hamlin. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...