Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

No. Not all of them.

But I can assure that a 40ish applicant who has faced credible accusations of having sex with a 17 year old would not be cleared. Nor would a man who, in his 50s or 60s, admitted to dumping a dead bear cub in Central Park. Nor would a man who has been the subject of credible allegations of repeatedly using illegal drugs other than marijuana in the very recent past.

These are not close calls.

Love credible accusations! 
 

"Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters. The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this."

--Thomas Foley (D, WA), Speaker, US House of Representatives

 

Which person is the druggie? I missed that one. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

She's not unqualified for some things, but we are talking here about the DNI. She wasn't even on the congressional committees dealing with Intel. Wrong person for the job.

I have long believed these are amongst the most dark and chilling words uttered by a person operating at the highest level of our government.  Of course the dopey bobble-headed talking head let it go, but if this is what passes for how the system is played by those who play it well, I’m perfectly fine with all Tulsi all the time. 
 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I have long believed these are amongst the most dark and chilling words uttered by a person operating at the highest level of our government.  Of course the dopey bobble-headed talking head let it go, but if this is what passes for how the system is played by those who play it well, I’m perfectly fine with all Tulsi all the time. 
 

 

Uh-oh. You are going after one of Frank’s guys. There’s a strong enough affinity there that Frank even stood up for him over Uncooked Cheeseburgergate. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Uh-oh. You are going after one of Frank’s guys. There’s a strong enough affinity there that Frank even stood up for him over Uncooked Cheeseburgergate. 

I wasn’t aware that Frank was a Cheeseburger Trutherrr.  I may have been distracted with Frenkle declaring  that to be a completely organic real moment in Chuck’s life while stating the Trump visit to McDonalds may have been staged.  
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
16 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I have long believed these are amongst the most dark and chilling words uttered by a person operating at the highest level of our government.  Of course the dopey bobble-headed talking head let it go, but if this is what passes for how the system is played by those who play it well, I’m perfectly fine with all Tulsi all the time. 
 

 

@The Frankish Reich

 

Just getting back to this point to get your feedback.  You’ve worked in government, discussed a vetting process I believe every American would hope would represent the gold standard for all administrations, and are uniquely qualified to offer feedback here. 
 

What Schumer implies here is pretty dark.  He didn’t refer to the legal process, the ability to prosecute or the integrity of the DOJ or Intelligence community.  He chose words that certainly can be viewed as sinister.  
 

What say you about what say he? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 11/18/2024 at 3:05 PM, The Frankish Reich said:

No. Not all of them.

But I can assure that a 40ish applicant who has faced credible accusations of having sex with a 17 year old would not be cleared. Nor would a man who, in his 50s or 60s, admitted to dumping a dead bear cub in Central Park. Nor would a man who has been the subject of credible allegations of repeatedly using illegal drugs other than marijuana in the very recent past.

These are not close calls.

Your concept of credible is hilarious after you didn't have an issue with the FACT that Biden was taking 10% of Hunters deals. The question that matters is will they be able to do their jobs properly. Every person Biden put in charge failed miserably in the foundational task of their departments. buttigieg, Lloyd, and Miguel Cardona are all horrendous at their jobs but they are "qualified". 

Posted
On 11/18/2024 at 1:30 PM, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Which person is the druggie?

Many allegations about Gaetz and party drugs. Of course, we haven't seen the report.

And, of course, Elon. I'm not saying that this worries me about him being a security risk; I'm just saying a regular prospective fed employee wouldn't get a clearance.

https://www.wsj.com/business/elon-musk-illegal-drugs-e826a9e1

 

Posted

Hey Finding, guess what?

 

You're going to HATE the next AG choice too....and the next one...and the one after that. 

 

Retribution coming regardless.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...