Bockeye Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 11/6/2024 at 8:48 AM, stevestojan said: We’ve been to: Baltimore, Miami, Jax, DC, and last year we went to KC. Always a blast but I have to admit the best atmosphere by a mile was KC. Great fans, cool city, and awesome day day environment. Maybe it’s because they’re playing with house money so to speak - they’ve been so damn dominant. I was a ND fan when they got smoked in the National Championship game by Alabama. Alabama fans could not have been nicer. Ended up drinking and partying with a ton of them that night. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, eball said: Live look-in at that process... there is some truth to this…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills742 Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago (edited) Edited 8 hours ago by bills742 5 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregg Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Tom Pelissero on X: "The #Colts placed veteran center Ryan Kelly on injured reserve. He's out at least four games." / X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Process Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Cooper not catching passes is a big concern, obviously... I worry Mack Hollins will be our #1 outside WR against Indy. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFBillsfan Posted 8 hours ago Author Share Posted 8 hours ago 8 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Cooper not catching passes is a big concern, obviously... I worry Mack Hollins will be our #1 outside WR against Indy. Seems like we avoided a big injury to Coleman. Benford trending in the right direction but not sensing Cooper will play this week against Indy. Doubtful Coleman plays as well. 4 hours ago, zow2 said: I thought last week Flacco looked like the old and ineffective QB with the Jets and Broncos. Maybe age is finally catching up. Last week people were lamenting that the Bills won't have the "easier" game with Anthony Richardson. Maybe in the end, the Bills catch a break by playing the more immobile Flacco. Let’s hope Flacco doesn’t somehow strike lightning in a bottle against the Bills. Stop the run and get after Flacco! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 5 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said: I will be curious to get your thoughts on the stadium. When I was running the numbers, I felt the Bills could pretty much build the exact same stadium as Lucas Oil (with the roof!) for what they are paying for their new stadium. I’ll report back. And since this is my third trip since quitting drinking, I’ll remember it! 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 34 minutes ago, Gregg said: Tom Pelissero on X: "The #Colts placed veteran center Ryan Kelly on injured reserve. He's out at least four games." / X If LT Raimann (concussion) can't go Sunday, the Colts will be starting 3 rookies on the OL. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zow2 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 47 minutes ago, TFBillsfan said: Seems like we avoided a big injury to Coleman. Benford trending in the right direction but not sensing Cooper will play this week against Indy. Doubtful Coleman plays as well. Let’s hope Flacco doesn’t somehow strike lightning in a bottle against the Bills. Stop the run and get after Flacco! C'mon Cooper. We need players that are made of rubber, not glass. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago We might be down Coleman and Cooper this week. Darn it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, TFBillsfan said: Seems like we avoided a big injury to Coleman. Benford trending in the right direction but not sensing Cooper will play this week against Indy. Doubtful Coleman plays as well. I’m sure there’s more to it than this… but the way I see it… both Coleman and Cooper have wrist/hand concerns. So they can run fine. We keep trotting #1 and #89 out there every week and neither does more than run around and make sure we have 11 people on the field. Why not let Coleman and Cooper be those that run around and don’t catch any passes? At least the defense thinks they might. If I’m on the defense and #89 goes in the game, why would you think he’s a viable receiving option on the play? He’s clearly there just to go in motion and run around. I’d be stacking the box and doubling the other WR every time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBaumer Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago No way either is playing this week if they are not even catching footballs yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, stevestojan said: I’ll report back. And since this is my third trip since quitting drinking, I’ll remember it! It will be a colorful report if you've given up drinking for hallucinogens. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YattaOkasan Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Dan said: I’m sure there’s more to it than this… but the way I see it… both Coleman and Cooper have wrist/hand concerns. So they can run fine. We keep trotting #1 and #89 out there every week and neither does more than run around and make sure we have 11 people on the field. Why not let Coleman and Cooper be those that run around and don’t catch any passes? At least the defense thinks they might. If I’m on the defense and #89 goes in the game, why would you think he’s a viable receiving option on the play? He’s clearly there just to go in motion and run around. I’d be stacking the box and doubling the other WR every time. Jet sweeps are why you cant just stack the box? But i like your idea of coleman or cooper can do that as well as be a receiving option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logic Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Dan said: I’m sure there’s more to it than this… but the way I see it… both Coleman and Cooper have wrist/hand concerns. So they can run fine. We keep trotting #1 and #89 out there every week and neither does more than run around and make sure we have 11 people on the field. Why not let Coleman and Cooper be those that run around and don’t catch any passes? At least the defense thinks they might. If I’m on the defense and #89 goes in the game, why would you think he’s a viable receiving option on the play? He’s clearly there just to go in motion and run around. I’d be stacking the box and doubling the other WR every time. In order to play snaps at WR in the NFL, you have to be able to run block and get off the press. Both of those things require use of the hands/wrist, and neither would be possible for a player with an injured wrist to do successfully. That means that having such a player on the field during run plays would be detrimental to the success of said plays, and having them run routes wouldn't fool the defense for very long if they weren't able to do the hand-fighting necessary of running routes. I get what you're saying, but in practical terms, the requirements of the WR position would not allow a player with an injured wrist to contribute to the offense's success in any meaningful way. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoundingDog Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago This is not your father's NFL any more. Ask a player with an obvious injury to play with a real possibility of worsen the injury? NFLPA and lawyers will be all over the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills742 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Well that's not ideal. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 51 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: It will be a colorful report if you've given up drinking for hallucinogens. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit amphetamines. Edited 5 hours ago by Mark Vader Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiltonWaddams Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit amphetamines. And I picked a great week to start them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.