Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted November 5 Posted November 5 (edited) 3 hours ago, Mister Defense said: So, from what you have seen from Brady, the resurrecting of the Bills' offense overnight, the 13-3 record since he took over, the resurrection of the Bills ground game, one of the best offenses in the NFL this year, even after significant off season changes etcetera etcetera etcetera... You would "dump Brady" with, literally no thought whatsover, as you say, in less than a second, in a "nano second"? So, to you, Brady has been soo bad as the Bills' OC, you would not even have to THINK about a move to Stefanski, not even consider any of the objective information available, no stats, no evidence of Brady's tenure as the OC, don't need to weigh the pros and cons of both men as OCs, not consider what Brady has done so far? At all. And ditto for Stefanski--what he has done so far as an OC is soo good to you, so superb, so superlative, that you would not even need to think about firing Brady and replacing him with Stefanski? For you, a "nano second" is all you need to make this major decision? So, that clearly implies no thoughts needed, no consideration of any facts, evidence, comparison, and basic reasoning needed? You would automatically do this without any consideration? Why? One would think with such a definitive point of you, and no thoughts or consideration on this move needed, that there would be something that caused this to happen inside your head. But none are spoken of in your post. What leads you to your decision? Can you tell us why? I read this posting, and all I can picture is Barry Scheck grilling lab tech Dennis Fung, during the Simpson trial. 🤔😁 Edited November 5 by Ridgewaycynic2013 Quote
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 5 Posted November 5 20 hours ago, What a Tuel said: I think you underestimate how much McDermott elevates the defense. There is a reason why despite so many injuries, the next man up is prepared and capable. It has a lot to do with talent evaluation but also to do with the coaching putting players in positions to succeed. At the end of the day I dont blame McDermott for Bass missing the tying field goal against the chiefs, I don't blame McDermott for Allen missing the open throw for a 1st down and clock burning against the Chiefs. I dont even blame McDermott for the hail murray Cardinals game, the hail mary in the Jets game this year. Each of those situations which you consider fire worthy for McDermott the players were in the position to succeed and they didn't execute. There is one situation that bothers me about McDermott and that is whether or not there was a communication failure on kickoff in 13 seconds, and why they didn't have someone there to tackle Kelce as soon as he caught the ball to put them in FG range. Most players on the team earned their playing time - Edwards moved from 6th OL to starting LG. Lewis and Ingram were udfa practice squad guys who have become valuable depth pieces despite their perigree. Hamlin has been a backup for 3 years. Rapp was brought in a year before starting. Bernard sat a year. Williams. Shakir. Hamlin. A core of players who earned their jobs makes it easier imo to incorporate new blood like Douglas and cooper. Doesn't always work. But it helps with building a team, a roster, a program etc. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.