Johnnycage46 Posted November 3 Posted November 3 Hell no. Injuries happen. It sucks but we have 8 games left. Need to keep playing, keep winning.
Draconator Posted November 3 Posted November 3 Just now, Simon said: If it's Blackberry I'll be right over..... Vanilla, but I'll have to buy a bottle of Blackberry and give it a try
K D Posted November 3 Author Posted November 3 Just now, DuckyBoys said: they need to play every week Looked like dog poo after not playing pre season Reps matter And then Josh gets hurt in a meaningless week 17 or 18 game (knock on wood)
Simon Posted November 3 Posted November 3 Just now, Draconator said: Vanilla, but I'll have to buy a bottle of Blackberry and give it a try Good luck finding it. I've been to stores in 3 different states with varying luck, mostly bad. 1
Warcodered Posted November 3 Posted November 3 5 minutes ago, That's No Moon said: Why is it ridiculous? If you have the division locked up and can't get to the 1 seed what's the difference? I mean when has taking a commanding lead and then just taking it easy ever gone wrong?
Ya Digg? Posted November 3 Posted November 3 5 minutes ago, K D said: The point is by the time we get to the final 2 games it might be out of reach even for seeds 2-3 as they have the tie breakers. You guys are assuming we are winning out or something. We have a very tough schedule. Not tough enough where we won't win the division but tough enough where Houston and Baltimore might be ahead of us by the home stretch 3 minutes ago, Simon said: Talking about sitting multiple starters almost two months from now? C'mon man..... Simon answered this perfectly, that should end the thread
That's No Moon Posted November 3 Posted November 3 3 minutes ago, Simon said: Talking about sitting multiple starters almost two months from now? C'mon man..... Yeah, but looking at the current situation, it's way more likely than normal. Premature sure, not ridiculous. 1
mannc Posted November 3 Posted November 3 5 minutes ago, K D said: The point is by the time we get to the final 2 games it might be out of reach even for seeds 2-3 as they have the tie breakers. You guys are assuming we are winning out or something. We have a very tough schedule. Not tough enough where we won't win the division but tough enough where Houston and Baltimore might be ahead of us by the home stretch Baltimore has a much harder schedule than we do and we’re already a game up on them.
K D Posted November 3 Author Posted November 3 Just now, Ya Digg? said: Simon answered this perfectly, that should end the thread So your plan is week 17 and 18 we can't improve our playoff seeding but you are trotting the starters out there in the cold for a meaningless game? I think it's worth a discussion
US Egg Posted November 3 Posted November 3 Just now, K D said: And then Josh gets hurt in a meaningless week 17 or 18 game (knock on wood) The “what if” card. I fold.
K D Posted November 3 Author Posted November 3 Just now, US Egg said: The “what if” card. I fold. Yes because nobody has ever sat their QB in a meaningless game before because of "what if." You are acting like this is something new
Simon Posted November 3 Posted November 3 1 minute ago, K D said: I think it's worth a discussion Yeah, in Week 16. Starting a thread about it now is ludicrous. Stick it in the postgame thread where most folks can easily disregard it. 1
Ya Digg? Posted November 3 Posted November 3 Just now, K D said: So your plan is week 17 and 18 we can't improve our playoff seeding but you are trotting the starters out there in the cold for a meaningless game? I think it's worth a discussion Yes I’m not sitting them for 2 straight weeks, that’s a terrible idea. Start them, have them play, get the game in hand then pull them-pretty much like any other game. How many times have you seen teams lose after getting a bye because they say they’re guys the final week or 2 of the season. That happens far too often
colin Posted November 3 Posted November 3 You don't sit healthy starters, but if we end up there, which I think we will, I bet we err on the side of sitting guys who are less than 100% rather than playing them
K D Posted November 3 Author Posted November 3 Just now, Ya Digg? said: Yes I’m not sitting them for 2 straight weeks, that’s a terrible idea. Start them, have them play, get the game in hand then pull them-pretty much like any other game. How many times have you seen teams lose after getting a bye because they say they’re guys the final week or 2 of the season. That happens far too often Fair enough. That's why I asked the question. I don't think it's so cut and dry. Maybe you play them but play it safe by running the ball a lot and quick passes. I can dig that
Draconator Posted November 3 Posted November 3 6 minutes ago, Simon said: Good luck finding it. I've been to stores in 3 different states with varying luck, mostly bad. I have a good friend who owns a liquor store. 1
SoonerBillsFan Posted November 3 Posted November 3 5 minutes ago, Simon said: Good luck finding it. I've been to stores in 3 different states with varying luck, mostly bad. My brother, Around Christmas, gets Pecan Pie moonshine 🙂
Simon Posted November 3 Posted November 3 Just now, SoonerBillsFan said: My brother, Around Christmas, gets Pecan Pie moonshine 🙂 It's got to be better than pie with pecans in it. 1
Recommended Posts