nedboy7 Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 27 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Here's a handy guide for useful idiots regarding the up coming election day(s) and things that might happen that could result in skepticism about the outcome. If these happen in swing states then the distrust factor is only magnified. Voting machine malfunctions, running out of ballots etc. that seem to happen primarily in either highly red or blue precincts. Ejecting poll watchers of a particular party. Exorbitant wait times, again especially when happening only in highly partisan precincts. Stopping the vote count in multiple swing states. Resuming the count at 3 am, instead of 9 am as promised, in many of those areas that stopped counting the night before. Phantom water main breaks in key precincts as a reason to pause counting. Call me crazy, but these are just a few examples of things that undermine trust in election outcomes. There are how many millions of people voting at thousands of places scattered over a continent and these are the examples of voter fruad? And it is only designed to help the left? Yikes dude. You all live is some bizarre conspiracy world where you take every situation and bend it into your reality created by an echo chamber of stupidity. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 31 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Here's a handy guide for useful idiots regarding the up coming election day(s) and things that might happen that could result in skepticism about the outcome. If these happen in swing states then the distrust factor is only magnified. Voting machine malfunctions, running out of ballots etc. that seem to happen primarily in either highly red or blue precincts. Ejecting poll watchers of a particular party. Exorbitant wait times, again especially when happening only in highly partisan precincts. Stopping the vote count in multiple swing states. Resuming the count at 3 am, instead of 9 am as promised, in many of those areas that stopped counting the night before. Phantom water main breaks in key precincts as a reason to pause counting. Call me crazy, but these are just a few examples of things that undermine trust in election outcomes. Fraudulent mail in voter applications identified in Penn counties this week. A firm called Field & Media Corp has been identified as the source. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 1 hour ago, Starr-Bills said: Pot, meet kettle. Hey look at me, I'm wrong and I totally thought Trump said he wanted to shoot her in the face so and I'm embarrassed I fell for another msm lie and I'm going to lash out on maga cause their the real mouth breathers.......am I following correctly? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgrochester55 Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 (edited) 1 hour ago, nedboy7 said: There are how many millions of people voting at thousands of places scattered over a continent and these are the examples of voter fruad? And it is only designed to help the left? Yikes dude. You all live is some bizarre conspiracy world where you take every situation and bend it into your reality created by an echo chamber of stupidity. If Trump wins, I do not want to hear one comment from the media or democrats about questioning the election process. After four years of driving down our throats that questioning the election is taboo and violating sacred ground, it will only make them look silly and narcissistic. Edited November 2 by dgrochester55 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 11 minutes ago, dgrochester55 said: If Trump wins, I do not want to hear one comment from the media or democrats about questioning the election process. After four years of driving down our throats that questioning the election is taboo and violating sacred ground, it will only make them look silly and narcissistic. Additionally it will be really weird if in four short years we can go from the most secure election in US history to it was stolen by Russian troll farms again. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 34 minutes ago, dgrochester55 said: If Trump wins, I do not want to hear one comment from the media or democrats about questioning the election process. After four years of driving down our throats that questioning the election is taboo and violating sacred ground, it will only make them look silly and narcissistic. When he loses will you, commit to the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 The liberal media’s distortion of Trump’s Liz Cheney comments exposes how panicked they are. BRENDAN O’NEILL So now Donald Trump wants to kill Liz Cheney? Worse, he wants to drag her before a firing squad. Is there no end to this man’s wickedness? The Lefty web and progressive media are awash with anguished commentary on Trump’s latest dream of violence. “Trump fantasises about guns pointed at Liz Cheney’s face”, pants an irate Rolling Stone. Trump has “told a crowd” that “Liz Cheney should have guns ‘trained on her face’”, yelps Vanity Fair. He wants “nine barrels shooting” at her, cries Politico. There’s only one problem with this vision of Trump as such a lunatic liability that he fancies hauling poor Liz Cheney off for execution – it is completely untrue. It is undiluted poppycock. What Trump actually did was criticise Cheney’s pro-militarist streak. In a sit-down chat with Tucker Carlson in Arizona, he laid into her “war hawk” tendencies. And he wondered out loud – in his usual, unfiltered language – how she would feel about war if she was in the thick of one herself. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-liberal-media-s-distortion-of-trump-s-liz-cheney-comments-exposes-how-panicked-they-are/ar-AA1tlThP 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 Broke: Trump said Liz Cheney should face a firing squad. Woke: That’s a lie, he implied that she’s a chicken hawk. Bespoke: I wish Trump said that Liz Cheney should face a firing squad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 Bill Maher Rips Media for Liz Cheney Firing Squad Hoax: ‘Just Don’t Lie to Me.’ Left-wing comedian Bill Maher tore into the corporate media during his Real Time Overtime segment for lying about Donald Trump calling for Liz Cheney to be executed. “I woke up to the headline ‘Donald Trump had called for a firing squad for Liz Cheney,’ said Maher, adding, “and this is what I really don’t like about the media — No, he didn’t.” Maher goes on to explain what Trump clearly said. “He’s criticizing her for being a war hawk. I mean she is Dick Cheney’s daughter.” Maher then read Trump’s full and unambiguous quote. Here it is: Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let’s see how she feels about it, you know when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington, in a nice building saying, “Oh, gee, well, let’s send — let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.” “Just to be clear,” Maher continued, “this is exactly what hippies always said. This is exactly what peaceniks always said. [Trump is saying], ‘You know what, it’s very easy to sit in your building and send young men to die.’” He then said to the media, “Just don’t lie to me. I don’t like Donald Trump. Don’t lie to me and tell me he wants her in front of a firing squad. He was saying something that … again, sounds like what hippies used to say.” https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2024/11/02/nolte-bill-maher-rips-media-liz-cheney-firing-squad-hoax-just-dont-lie-me/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 Liz Cheney is another miserable angry man in the mold of Big Momma Michael Obama. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 5 hours ago, Starr-Bills said: who was potus? Who makes the decision of sending troops into combat? right the felon. Okay so he is in charge. Cheney was an advisor, she gave her opinion. his response to getting advice from an advisor, a subordinate, is to threaten her with 9 guns pointing to her face. “To see how she likes it” so a person in a position of power threatened violence on a subordinate for their opinion. and you guys are okay with that. Cool. And again with the delusional inability at comprehension… You can dispense with the pretending, already …We know you’re the type who thinks Trump praised Nazis at Charlottesville, no matter how many times the truth punches you in the face… Uh oh…I better be careful…You might accuse me of threatening you…🤣🤣🤣 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 2 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: And again with the delusional inability at comprehension… You can dispense with the pretending, already …We know you’re the type who thinks Trump praised Nazis at Charlottesville, no matter how many times the truth punches you in the face… Uh oh…I better be careful…You might accuse me of threatening you…🤣🤣🤣 So did you wrote that to threaten me and decided to "tone it down", is that what you are saying? No, probably not, I doubt you have the rhetorical chops for that. You seem to accept that the person being threatened gets to decide what constitutes a threat by your statement. Words have consequences. The felon has condoned and encouraged violence as a means to political ends for nearly a decade now. If he wasn't constantly saying shoot protestors in the knees or have a really rough day to put people in line, maybe he gets the benefit of the doubt. But at this point, no. So he has no one to blame but himself that his words are interpreted as a threat by not just me, not just Liz Cheney, but the AZ State AG, and millions of others. You can sane wash it all you want, but just like the "X-Men", post you are living on fantasy island. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th&long Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 1 hour ago, dgrochester55 said: If Trump wins, I do not want to hear one comment from the media or democrats about questioning the election process. After four years of driving down our throats that questioning the election is taboo and violating sacred ground, it will only make them look silly and narcissistic. Stop making sh it up. No one said questioning it was wrong or bad. Every candidate has that right. Providing no proof in court case after court case and crying about it for 4 years? Babies. Cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 1 minute ago, Starr-Bills said: So did you wrote that to threaten me and decided to "tone it down", is that what you are saying? No, probably not, I doubt you have the rhetorical chops for that. You seem to accept that the person being threatened gets to decide what constitutes a threat by your statement. Words have consequences. The felon has condoned and encouraged violence as a means to political ends for nearly a decade now. If he wasn't constantly saying shoot protestors in the knees or have a really rough day to put people in line, maybe he gets the benefit of the doubt. But at this point, no. So he has no one to blame but himself that his words are interpreted as a threat by not just me, not just Liz Cheney, but the AZ State AG, and millions of others. You can sane wash it all you want, but just like the "X-Men", post you are living on fantasy island. Jesus, take the wheel…🤣🤣🤣 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th&long Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 24 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: So did you wrote that to threaten me and decided to "tone it down", is that what you are saying? No, probably not, I doubt you have the rhetorical chops for that. You seem to accept that the person being threatened gets to decide what constitutes a threat by your statement. Words have consequences. The felon has condoned and encouraged violence as a means to political ends for nearly a decade now. If he wasn't constantly saying shoot protestors in the knees or have a really rough day to put people in line, maybe he gets the benefit of the doubt. But at this point, no. So he has no one to blame but himself that his words are interpreted as a threat by not just me, not just Liz Cheney, but the AZ State AG, and millions of others. You can sane wash it all you want, but just like the "X-Men", post you are living on fantasy island. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 23 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: So did you wrote that to threaten me and decided to "tone it down", is that what you are saying? No, probably not, I doubt you have the rhetorical chops for that. Truly fantastic! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts