Big Blitz Posted November 1 Author Share Posted November 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 Full quote for context: “She’s a radical war hawk,” Trump said of Cheney, following a tangent about his pardon in 2018 of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, a former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, her father. “Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.” To anyone with a function brain, it's clear he's not talking about lining her up in a firing squad, unless it's some kinda Running Man thing where she gets a fighting chance by being armed. Is it any wonder people are losing faith in the media? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 1 Author Share Posted November 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K D Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 (edited) People unfortunately do still believe the news. They are what we call "easily influenced." This is a nice way of saying they are morons. The Dems know they won't read anything past the headline or look things up for themselves. They just have to get the talking points out there and see if it sticks. That's why we need an unbiased media. Enough with the "opinions" just report the facts. If you lie and you get caught you lose your license and get fired. Pretty simple. Edited November 1 by K D 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 7 minutes ago, yall said: Full quote for context: “She’s a radical war hawk,” Trump said of Cheney, following a tangent about his pardon in 2018 of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, a former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, her father. “Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.” To anyone with a function brain, it's clear he's not talking about lining her up in a firing squad, unless it's some kinda Running Man thing where she gets a fighting chance by being armed. Is it any wonder people are losing faith in the media? Anyone with a functional brain would know that the 'Cheny' he should be talking about as a war hawk (and potential war criminal) is the former VP (who Scooter Libby was working for and Trump pardoned) her FATHER. He was VPOTUS not Liz. So why is he talking about Liz and not dad? Who the f knows he is losing his marbles, but one can speculate. She is a she and he feels safe attacking women. She is campaigning agains him. And why 9 guns? (justices) and why at her face (is this some sudo sexual fantasy?) either way the illusion to pointing us at a political rival "to see how she likes it" is so out of line. I mean Biden said the word garbage and Hillary said deplorable but guns in the face of a woman "to see how she likes it" yes that's fine shut up libs and let the felon get to the real work of "protecting women if they like it or not" (and since were on it most likely he meant the people telling him (his advisors) not to talk about protecting women but again losing his marbles. sigh. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 1 Author Share Posted November 1 Tells you who’s winning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 5 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Anyone with a functional brain would know that the 'Cheny' he should be talking about as a war hawk (and potential war criminal) is the former VP (who Scooter Libby was working for and Trump pardoned) her FATHER. He was VPOTUS not Liz. So why is he talking about Liz and not dad? Who the f knows he is losing his marbles, but one can speculate. She is a she and he feels safe attacking women. She is campaigning agains him. And why 9 guns? (justices) and why at her face (is this some sudo sexual fantasy?) either way the illusion to pointing us at a political rival "to see how she likes it" is so out of line. I mean Biden said the word garbage and Hillary said deplorable but guns in the face of a woman "to see how she likes it" yes that's fine shut up libs and let the felon get to the real work of "protecting women if they like it or not" (and since were on it most likely he meant the people telling him (his advisors) not to talk about protecting women but again losing his marbles. sigh. Just give up. You're making me sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 3 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Anyone with a functional brain would know that the 'Cheny' he should be talking about as a war hawk (and potential war criminal) is the former VP (who Scooter Libby was working for and Trump pardoned) her FATHER. He was VPOTUS not Liz. So why is he talking about Liz and not dad? Who the f knows he is losing his marbles, but one can speculate. She is a she and he feels safe attacking women. She is campaigning agains him. And why 9 guns? (justices) and why at her face (is this some sudo sexual fantasy?) either way the illusion to pointing us at a political rival "to see how she likes it" is so out of line. I mean Biden said the word garbage and Hillary said deplorable but guns in the face of a woman "to see how she likes it" yes that's fine shut up libs and let the felon get to the real work of "protecting women if they like it or not" (and since were on it most likely he meant the people telling him (his advisors) not to talk about protecting women but again losing his marbles. sigh. Meh, it's unideal and inarticulate, but it's the functional equivalent of saying "you don't see her fighting do you?". But putting that aside for a moment, along with his irrational hatred of her, the way it's being portrayed is rather dishonest. That's my beef with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Tells you who’s winning You mean like Leon owning twitter? FoxNews, Oan, Etc? have been doing for the last two years. or the 600+ influencers paid by Russia as charged by the DOJ? Need I go on? Okay sure. 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Just give up. You're making me sad. But that's my goal! you're a dream killer you rascal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 Just now, Starr-Bills said: You mean like Leon owning twitter? FoxNews, Oan, Etc? have been doing for the last two years. or the 600+ influencers paid by Russia as charged by the DOJ? Need I go on? Okay sure. Can you admit Trump didn't threaten to shoot Cheney? We believe in u! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 5 minutes ago, yall said: unidea Its, Mr. It's to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 31 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: What's one more criminal charge when you have 80+ In all seriousness, I’m sure you recognize this whole story is a fabrication, even if your partisanship won’t allow you to say it out loud…Am I right? 😉 5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Can you admit Trump didn't threaten to shoot Cheney? We believe in u! If you know Billsy- then you know he can’t do it…😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 1 minute ago, JaCrispy said: In all seriousness, I’m sure you recognize this whole story is a fabrication, even if your partisanship won’t allow you to say it out loud…Am I right? 😉 Bingo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 1 Author Share Posted November 1 6 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: You mean like Leon owning twitter? FoxNews, Oan, Etc? have been doing for the last two years. or the 600+ influencers paid by Russia as charged by the DOJ? Need I go on? Okay sure. But that's my goal! you're a dream killer you rascal. Did he threaten to have her killed or no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 29 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Interesting. Yet both candidates are more than happy to send money to have Israel soldiers fight terrorists. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 (edited) 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Bingo! It’s all about owning the news cycle… Dems don’t care if a story is factual as long as Trump is on the defensive about the propaganda being put out… Its a great strategy, even if sinister and unethical… We can only hope to drink their tears when all is said and done…👍 Edited November 1 by JaCrispy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 20 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Anyone with a functional brain would know that the 'Cheny' he should be talking about as a war hawk (and potential war criminal) is the former VP (who Scooter Libby was working for and Trump pardoned) her FATHER. He was VPOTUS not Liz. So why is he talking about Liz and not dad? Who the f knows he is losing his marbles, but one can speculate. She is a she and he feels safe attacking women. She is campaigning agains him. And why 9 guns? (justices) and why at her face (is this some sudo sexual fantasy?) either way the illusion to pointing us at a political rival "to see how she likes it" is so out of line. I mean Biden said the word garbage and Hillary said deplorable but guns in the face of a woman "to see how she likes it" yes that's fine shut up libs and let the felon get to the real work of "protecting women if they like it or not" (and since were on it most likely he meant the people telling him (his advisors) not to talk about protecting women but again losing his marbles. sigh. Guns in the face of a woman? Feminists want equal or better treatment than men but when confronted with an uncomfortable situation they and their proponents pull the weaker sex card. I laugh at you. No special treatment anymore. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: Guns in the face of a woman? Feminists want equal or better treatment than men but when confronted with an uncomfortable situation they and their proponents pull the weaker sex card. I laugh at you. No special treatment anymore. Keep trying, you're only digging a deeper hole. 14 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: In all seriousness, I’m sure you recognize this whole story is a fabrication, even if your partisanship won’t allow you to say it out loud…Am I right? 😉 If you know Billsy- then you know he can’t do it…😉 Under Arizona law, threatening or intimidating a person is illegal. It can be charged as a Class 1 misdemeanor or Class 6 felony. Trump campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt responded: "This is just a desperate attempt to help out Kamala Harris’ failing campaign.” https://www.12news.com/article/news/politics/elections/arizona-top-prosecutor-kris-investigating-trumps-comments-about-cheney-possible-death-threat/75-91f8b734-06eb-4aeb-a633-89be0df7c4c4 12 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Did he threaten to have her killed or no? Under Arizona law, threatening or intimidating a person is illegal. It can be charged as a Class 1 misdemeanor or Class 6 felony. https://www.12news.com/article/news/politics/elections/arizona-top-prosecutor-kris-investigating-trumps-comments-about-cheney-possible-death-threat/75-91f8b734-06eb-4aeb-a633-89be0df7c4c4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 18 minutes ago, Starr-Bills said: Anyone with a functional brain would know that the 'Cheny' he should be talking about as a war hawk (and potential war criminal) is the former VP (who Scooter Libby was working for and Trump pardoned) her FATHER. He was VPOTUS not Liz. So why is he talking about Liz and not dad? Who the f knows he is losing his marbles, but one can speculate. She is a she and he feels safe attacking women. She is campaigning agains him. And why 9 guns? (justices) and why at her face (is this some sudo sexual fantasy?) either way the illusion to pointing us at a political rival "to see how she likes it" is so out of line. I mean Biden said the word garbage and Hillary said deplorable but guns in the face of a woman "to see how she likes it" yes that's fine shut up libs and let the felon get to the real work of "protecting women if they like it or not" (and since were on it most likely he meant the people telling him (his advisors) not to talk about protecting women but again losing his marbles. sigh. Liz Cheney was a strong proponent and supporter of her father in invading Iraq. You probably forgot. The rest of your post is weird....and seriously....'suto'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starr-Bills Posted November 1 Share Posted November 1 (edited) 5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Liz Cheney was a strong proponent and supporter of her father in invading Iraq. You probably forgot. The rest of your post is weird....and seriously....'suto'? She wasn't in office then. So were millions of other Americans, thanks to Powell and the 'Yellow cake' (checking my 6 for Sherpa). P.S. I watched his presentation to the UN live back then. Edited November 1 by Starr-Bills He said 9 guns pointed at her face. Is that because Epstine was in the news today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts