Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not even a matter of an inch there. Crazy that it wouldn’t be a touchdown if his foot had hit twice, but since it was 2cm higher and hit his shin, it was a TD. 

 

Eventually we’ll run out of crazy scenarios where we ask “Was that a catch?” Eventually they’ll have all happened. Like the thing about 1000 monkeys banging on typewriters for eternity eventually creating Shakespeare. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

There was nothing to show that his shin hit in bounds before his knee clearly hit out-of-bounds. A small market team wouldn't have gotten that call in a million years.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

People, the shin has always been equal to a player being down. It's not a new rule. You usually only see it applied on determining if a runner is down. Not if he is inbounds. But it can be used that way as well. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Man, it's really hard to believe that there isn't some directive to the officials to make sure an NYC team with a huge star stays relevant. That last drive was officiated like a WWE match.

Edited by T.E.
  • Agree 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...