Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not even a matter of an inch there. Crazy that it wouldn’t be a touchdown if his foot had hit twice, but since it was 2cm higher and hit his shin, it was a TD. 

 

Eventually we’ll run out of crazy scenarios where we ask “Was that a catch?” Eventually they’ll have all happened. Like the thing about 1000 monkeys banging on typewriters for eternity eventually creating Shakespeare. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

There was nothing to show that his shin hit in bounds before his knee clearly hit out-of-bounds. A small market team wouldn't have gotten that call in a million years.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted

People, the shin has always been equal to a player being down. It's not a new rule. You usually only see it applied on determining if a runner is down. Not if he is inbounds. But it can be used that way as well. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Man, it's really hard to believe that there isn't some directive to the officials to make sure an NYC team with a huge star stays relevant. That last drive was officiated like a WWE match.

Edited by T.E.
  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...