Jump to content

Brady under fire for calling Josh a "spaz" on Sunday's broadcast...


Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 8:58 PM, Simon said:

 

Who was being over-sensitive and shaming people?

Expand  

 

Maybe like you said, this is much ado about nothing.

 

I guess I was just reacting to the thread title of "Brady under fire..." assuming there was some big push back. But maybe it was just one article or what not. Wasn't directed at anyone on the board.

Posted (edited)

I think it be less an issue were if another in that profession other than Tom Brady.

 

That said, I cringed a bit hearing it. 

Edited by US Egg
Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 8:55 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

For the millionth time I am talking about British English. I accept it has other meanings in American English.

Expand  


NFL needs to have - I don’t know, maybe Kyle Brandt? - do a public service announcement about the use of this word. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 9:04 PM, US Egg said:

I think it be much less an issue were it not Tom Brady. That said, I cringed a bit hearing it. 

Expand  

 

If I heard it, I think any cringe would likely come from it being such an infantile thing to say.

It's like listening to a grown man call somebody a gaylord :doh:

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 9:10 PM, Simon said:

 

If I heard it, I think any cringe would likely come from it being such an infantile thing to say.

It's like listening to a grown man call somebody a gaylord :doh:

Expand  


You take that back, or I’ll kiss you on the cheek. 

Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 9:10 PM, Simon said:

If I heard it, I think any cringe would likely come from it being such an infantile thing to say.

It's like listening to a grown man call somebody a gaylord :doh:

Expand  

Can I laugh at the gaylord? 😬

Posted

Is he really "under fire"? Seems to me like he said a word that is considered offensive in the UK - which the NFL is actively trying to expand their market into - and is likely being told by Fox not to use that word anymore. I've seen more outrage about the supposed outrage than the supposed outrage itself. I haven't seen anyone calling for him to be fined, fired, or anything like that.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 10/30/2024 at 9:35 PM, HappyDays said:

Is he really "under fire"? Seems to me like he said a word that is considered offensive in the UK - which the NFL is actively trying to expand their market into - and is likely being told by Fox not to use that word anymore. I've seen more outrage about the supposed outrage than the supposed outrage itself. I haven't seen anyone calling for him to be fined, fired, or anything like that.

Expand  


Agreed. The OP saying Brady is “under fire” is an affront to our troops stationed overseas, or me when I come home at 2 am after a 1 pm Bills game. 

Edited by WotAGuy
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 2:54 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

It is an offensive short form of the word "spastic" which unless it is used in its strictest medical form is considered offensive. Calling someone a "spastic" because they behave erraticly is considered pretty offensive to people eho actually have disabilities. 

Expand  

Only offensive to Karens or Chads. Words often have multiple meanings and this certainly would fall in that category Context is important. Thank goodness we won the revolution. This type of thinking is exhausting. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 2:32 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

We discussed this in the SB the other day. In the UK he'd have been fired, instantly. It is pretty much second only to the n word in terms of offensive terms you can't use. I understand it doesn't have the same baggage in the US but honestly it made me very uncomfortable. I mentioned it in the GDT

Expand  

Interesting.  But, pretty benign on this side of the 'pond'.

Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 9:43 PM, Meatloaf63 said:

Only offensive to Karens or Chads. Words often have multiple meanings and this certainly would fall in that category Context is important. Thank goodness we won the revolution. This type of thinking is exhausting. 

Expand  

 

Millionth time. Meaning in British English.

Posted
  On 10/30/2024 at 10:17 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

Millionth time. Meaning in British English.

Expand  

 

Yeah well I have a few complaints about your British English:

 

1) Not every word needs an extra "u" thrown in. The letter "o" is perfectly fine on its own.

 

2) The first floor is the one that touches the ground. The one above it is the second floor. Etc.

 

3) We don't learn histories, sciences, or Englishes in school. And so neither do we learn maths. It is a singular concept.

  • Disagree 1
Posted

Wait ... Who listens to Brady ?

 I didn't even know he was calling the game until midway through the 2nd Quarter, I tend to watch football with the sound one notch above mute.

  • Agree 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...