BullBuchanan Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago The bills have been chasing a big-bodied redzone target for as long as I can remember. It seems they finally have one, and I don't see them having regrets about that. Sure, he may have Lee Smith speed, but he seems like he'll be a good one to have when other receivers can't get open. Reminds me of Dez Bryant. Hopefully he stays healthier. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
without a drought Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago There was never a point where I wanted Worthy, as a college player, draft time and especially now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Posted 2 hours ago Author Share Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Answer is pretty obvious 8 games in. Why is this a thread? To prove separation stats don't matter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkyMannn Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago These last two games, Coleman has really raised his performance. Maybe adjusting to the NFL, or JA and Brady looking more his way. It's all good to see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 59 minutes ago, Simon said: It's to shorten the barrel Damn, that was good and spontaneous. Right over my big head. Lesson learned, again. Look before leaping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, US Egg said: Damn, that was good and spontaneous. Right over my big head. Lesson learned, again. Look before leaping. Sorry, can't talk right now. Still mad at you for questioning the unsurpassed value and quality of Harbor Freight. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikePJ76 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Worthy or Coleman and Carter. Gee I wonder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bockeye Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I knew there were two Chiefs fans on this board! Show yourselves! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, Lost said: In regards to the below thread @Roundybout started relating to Bills WR lack of separation. I think an easy test of whether that actually matters or not could be decided if at this point in time, if people would rather have Xavier Worthy who is undeniably a better separator than Coleman. According to next gen stats Worthy's avg separation is 3.6 to Keon's 2.2. I suspect most people after half a season of play to evaluate would rather keep Coleman over Worthy but let's let the votes speak for themselves. Edit your poll settings to allow us to see who voted for what so we can publicly shame the 2 that voted yes 😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brand J Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Bockeye said: I knew there were two Chiefs fans on this board! Show yourselves! The poll results would indeed be more interesting if it was on the Chiefs board. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyBills Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago No freaking way. KC would 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago No, but in the weeks leading up to the draft, Ladd McConkey was my highest rated WR outside the top 3 and I would've taken him over either Coleman or Worthy. At the time, I thought the Bills were so weak at WR that position within that group mattered significantly less than just finding someone who could play, with the lack of speed and separation being another important factor. As it stands, I don't necessarily feel bad about that at all. McConkey is having an excellent rookie year. Would I make an even trade of Coleman for McConkey today? Probably not, as Coleman has been playing well in his own right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Otreply Posted 58 minutes ago Share Posted 58 minutes ago 2 hours ago, teef said: hi! See! What I mean, 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaL0L0k0 Posted 53 minutes ago Share Posted 53 minutes ago I guess you knew the response from the get go, and just wanted to gage the hard-die, gloom and doom contrarians of the board... right? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotAGuy Posted 44 minutes ago Share Posted 44 minutes ago While we’re at it, how about: “Would you rather have Allen or Darnold?” That’s a toughie too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaL0L0k0 Posted 43 minutes ago Share Posted 43 minutes ago 15 minutes ago, Brandon said: No, but in the weeks leading up to the draft, Ladd McConkey was my highest rated WR outside the top 3 and I would've taken him over either Coleman or Worthy. At the time, I thought the Bills were so weak at WR that position within that group mattered significantly less than just finding someone who could play, with the lack of speed and separation being another important factor. As it stands, I don't necessarily feel bad about that at all. McConkey is having an excellent rookie year. Would I make an even trade of Coleman for McConkey today? Probably not, as Coleman has been playing well in his own right. Keon >> Ladd in contested jump balls, even with cross linked arms with CBs, match point Keon! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted 37 minutes ago Share Posted 37 minutes ago This isn’t worthy of a thread. Do you guys see the pun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted 25 minutes ago Share Posted 25 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, BuffaL0L0k0 said: Keon >> Ladd in contested jump balls, even with cross linked arms with CBs, match point Keon! Coleman is definitely better in that situation, yes. McConkey was a guy I thought had a more well rounded overall skillset and would fit well at either the slot or flanker positions. He had enough speed to be a respectable deep threat and was exceedingly quick through his routes and able to generate consistent separation underneath. In the end, I thought he was a much lower risk prospect than Coleman with a likely floor as a high end #2, but as I said, Coleman is playing well and I probably wouldn't trade him for McConkey at this stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherMan Posted 14 minutes ago Share Posted 14 minutes ago Right now, no. Ask me again in three years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.