Jump to content

Poll: Would you trade Coleman for Worthy straight up?  

355 members have voted

  1. 1. After a half season of production from rookie WRs would you trade Keon Coleman for Xavier Worthy straight up?

    • Yes
      6
    • No
      349


Recommended Posts

Posted

The bills have been chasing a big-bodied redzone target for as long as I can remember. It seems they finally have one, and I don't see them having regrets about that. Sure, he may have Lee Smith speed, but he seems like he'll be a good one to have when other receivers can't get open. Reminds me of Dez Bryant. Hopefully he stays healthier.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Answer is pretty obvious 8 games in. Why is this a thread?

 

To prove separation stats don't matter

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

These last two games, Coleman has really raised his performance. Maybe adjusting to the NFL, or JA and Brady looking more his way. It's all good to see

Posted
59 minutes ago, Simon said:

It's to shorten the barrel

Damn, that was good and spontaneous. Right over my big head.

 

Lesson learned, again. Look before leaping. 

    

Posted
1 hour ago, US Egg said:

Damn, that was good and spontaneous. Right over my big head.

 

Lesson learned, again. Look before leaping. 

    

 

Sorry, can't talk right now.

Still mad at you for questioning the unsurpassed value and quality of Harbor Freight. :censored:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Lost said:

In regards to the below thread @Roundybout started relating to Bills WR lack of separation.  I think an easy test of whether that actually matters or not could be decided if at this point in time, if people would rather have Xavier Worthy who is undeniably a better separator than Coleman.   According to next gen stats Worthy's avg separation is 3.6 to Keon's 2.2.   I suspect most people after half a season of play to evaluate would rather keep Coleman over Worthy but let's let the votes speak for themselves.  

 

 

 

Edit your poll settings to allow us to see who voted for what so we can publicly shame the 2 that voted yes 😂

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bockeye said:

I knew there were two Chiefs fans on this board!  Show yourselves!

The poll results would indeed be more interesting if it was on the Chiefs board. 

  • Dislike 1
Posted

No, but in the weeks leading up to the draft,  Ladd McConkey was my highest rated WR outside the top 3 and I would've taken him over either Coleman or Worthy.  At the time,  I thought the Bills were so weak at WR that position within that group mattered significantly less than just finding someone who could play,  with the lack of speed and separation being another important factor.  

 

As it stands,  I don't necessarily feel bad about that at all.  McConkey is having an excellent rookie year.  Would I make an even trade of Coleman for McConkey today?  Probably not,  as Coleman has been playing well in his own right. 

Posted
2 hours ago, teef said:

hi!

See! What I mean, 🤣

Posted

I guess you knew the response from the get go,  and just wanted to gage the hard-die, gloom and doom contrarians of the board... right?

  • Vomit 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Brandon said:

No, but in the weeks leading up to the draft,  Ladd McConkey was my highest rated WR outside the top 3 and I would've taken him over either Coleman or Worthy.  At the time,  I thought the Bills were so weak at WR that position within that group mattered significantly less than just finding someone who could play,  with the lack of speed and separation being another important factor.  

 

As it stands,  I don't necessarily feel bad about that at all.  McConkey is having an excellent rookie year.  Would I make an even trade of Coleman for McConkey today?  Probably not,  as Coleman has been playing well in his own right. 

Keon >> Ladd in contested jump balls, even with cross linked arms with CBs, match point Keon!

Posted
5 minutes ago, BuffaL0L0k0 said:

Keon >> Ladd in contested jump balls, even with cross linked arms with CBs, match point Keon!

 

Coleman is definitely better in that situation,  yes.  

 

McConkey was a guy I thought had a more well rounded overall skillset and would fit well at either the slot or flanker positions.  He had enough speed to be a respectable deep threat and was exceedingly quick through his routes and able to generate consistent separation underneath.   In the end,  I thought he was a much lower risk prospect than Coleman with a likely floor as a high end #2,  but as I said,  Coleman is playing well and I probably wouldn't trade him for McConkey at this stage.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...