Receiver separation is still BAD

[EmotionallyUnstable]

9 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

What stat correlates linearly to points scored/winning?

 

Outside of turnovers and 3rd down conversion maybe? 
 

 

I believe DVOA and First downs per play combined (offense/defebse) are some of the greatest indicators of further success. 
 

I will look for the source 

[Augie]

35 minutes ago, Andrew Son said:

Certainly won’t hurt to get back the full arsenal.

 

But MY point is even with a full stable of excellent options, he’s still going to play how he plays.

 

To an extent, and when needed. Of course. Is there another point? 

[Don Otreply]

4 hours ago, Einstein said:

 

This argument holds water in Week 3, when we are one of the only teams to play them. It doesn’t hold water in Week 11, when they have lost to 4 other teams too.

 

 

I never said that.

 

I said assuming our lack of separation is acceptable because we have beaten the dregs of the NFL, is faulty.

 

 

Of course it holds water their starting Qb was out with yet another concussion, that’s some selective memory issues going on there…,  nuthing but luv , but come on already, 😁👍

4 hours ago, uticaclub said:

You're right; nothing is 100%. There are fans who would be more than happy to win the division and then lose in the playoffs again. I'm just hoping Cincinnati doesn't secure the 7 seed and we get the 2 seed, so we can at least win one playoff game again.

Colts were 4-5 last week, now they are 4-6

Hey, so I was wrong, it’s only a game for Christ sake, and we can only play those who on our schedule, 

 

GO BILLS!!!

[Sammy Watkins' Rib]

6 hours ago, Einstein said:

 

This would be a good argument if we didn’t have a losing record against teams with a winning record.

 

But as it stands, we have beaten 0 teams who currently hold a playoff spot. In fact, we are 0-2 against teams who currently are in a playoff spot.

 

And unfortunately, we will be playing good teams in the playoffs. So beating up against bottom feeders won’t help up as that time.

 

Beating the Chiefs will go a long way toward changing that perception, but until we actually do it, not getting separation against bad teams is … well … just that. 

The week one Arizona win looks better and better as the season goes on. Most overlooked that as nothing at then time. Bills played sloppy in the first half and basically dominated a good team in the second half to comeback and pull away. 

[Bockeye]

Someone else had a post that got hammered, but I tend to agree - it’s Brady.  How does MVS go off like he did after we traded him (yeah, yeah Allen can’t throw the deep ball - we barely tried year!), Kincaid is not looking too stellar, Samuel is a shell of himself.  All points to Brady.  Yes, we are scoring points, but once again, it’s Josh being a stud and making it happen (even when his stats look like *****……because of Brady). 

[uticaclub]

37 minutes ago, Bockeye said:

Someone else had a post that got hammered, but I tend to agree - it’s Brady.  How does MVS go off like he did after we traded him (yeah, yeah Allen can’t throw the deep ball - we barely tried year!), Kincaid is not looking too stellar, Samuel is a shell of himself.  All points to Brady.  Yes, we are scoring points, but once again, it’s Josh being a stud and making it happen (even when his stats look like *****……because of Brady). 

Brady calls running plays, which makes him better than Dorsey. However, I would have liked to interview someone from outside the organization. I hope the Jets hire him as HC next year.