Jump to content

Never Followed PFF..After This, Never Will


Rich Stadium Original

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:

If you want to see some total BS....

 

PFF has Patrick Mahomes, 8 TD's/9 INT's above Josh Allen.  Because it's clear, Mahomes is playing better than Allen this year.

Here are the other QB's rated higher than Allen this season: Geno Smith, Derek Carr, Lamar Jackson*, Aaron Rodgers (yes, you read that right), Brock Purdy, Justin Herbert, Trevor Lawrence, Baker Mayfield and Jayden Daniels.  I have an asterisk by Lamar because I think he's the only one that can be argued he's having a better year than Allen.

 

I just want to repeat this again for everyone to see, PFF has graded AARON RODGERS higher than Josh Allen this year.

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/patrick-mahomes/11765

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/josh-allen/46601

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/josh-allen/46601

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/aaron-rodgers/2241

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/derek-carr/8671

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/joe-burrow/28022

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/brock-purdy/77672

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/jayden-daniels/97993

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/jared-goff/10635 (below Allen but they have Goff rated just average this year)

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/justin-herbert/28237

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/kyler-murray/38334

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/baker-mayfield/46518

 

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/trevor-lawrence/77632

How is Duck Dodgers doing?  Still better than Josh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rich Stadium Original said:

Don't believe in a lot of this subjective nonsense to begin with, but for those who missed it (according to PFF):

 

Josh Allen graded out with a 64.1 after the Seattle game (guessing it was the fumble and INT??)

Gino Smith graded out at 72.7 

 

Your eyes lied to you..Allen was actually outplayed by Smith on Sunday..and by a considerable margin

Pff, apparently likes looking like a group of fools, and ya know, they’re good at it…, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a big difference between pff analytics (the data they capture) and their "analyst" that draw conclusions and write articles and do podcasts. I am pretty sure they try to tweak the noses of Bills mafia with dumb takes to generate some buzz.

 

Geno took sacks stumbled because he had his feet too close to his center's so he got stepped on, and threw a pick to a DL player.

 

Other than that he was meh, but on target with most of his throws. He did not play a horrible game, but he also did not do enough to get them a win.

 

Josh had his receiver slip out of his break so he threw the ball where he wasn't.

 

The fumble, he just lost the handle on the wet ball in a downpour.

 

Was not the best Allen game, but he was efficient, made key plays when we needed them, and he dug them out of a lot of long down and distance situations with the pre-snap penalties.

 

And he got our team the win. Those pff clowns can hand out their awards for style points for whatever that's worth.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFF says that Allen has 12 turnover worthy plays on the year. 

 

I think it should be about half that number. 

 

There was one easy INT dropped by the Texans, but that's about it. If we want to count each fumble as a turnover worthy play that gets us to 6. 

 

The INT he did throw shouldn't count b/c Cooper slipped 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

PFF says that Allen has 12 turnover worthy plays on the year. 

 

I think it should be about half that number. 

 

There was one easy INT dropped by the Texans, but that's about it. If we want to count each fumble as a turnover worthy play that gets us to 6. 

 

The INT he did throw shouldn't count b/c Cooper slipped 

That’s absurd lol yea i think from memory it’s about 5 or 6 max 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

PFF says that Allen has 12 turnover worthy plays on the year. 

 

I think it should be about half that number. 

 

There was one easy INT dropped by the Texans, but that's about it. If we want to count each fumble as a turnover worthy play that gets us to 6. 

 

The INT he did throw shouldn't count b/c Cooper slipped 

Turnover worthy, what a joke of a stat. I was a star MLB player worthy because I played little league and CYO good

 

Edited by Mike in Horseheads
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rich Stadium Original said:

Don't believe in a lot of this subjective nonsense to begin with, but for those who missed it (according to PFF):

 

Josh Allen graded out with a 64.1 after the Seattle game (guessing it was the fumble and INT??)

Gino Smith graded out at 72.7 

 

Your eyes lied to you..Allen was actually outplayed by Smith on Sunday..and by a considerable margin

 

I never trusted PFF grades for a host of reasons.

 

But didn't thinking their rating system was this bad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFF is definitely not perfect and Josh was absolutely better than Geno last weekend. So that's a miss for PFF. Still, if I'm comparing two offensive linemen or linebackers I've never heard of before, PFF is my only option other than finding and watching film beyond YT highlights myself. And I find PFF usually is pretty correlated with players I think had especially bad or good games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Rich Stadium Original said:

Don't believe in a lot of this subjective nonsense to begin with, but for those who missed it (according to PFF):

 

Josh Allen graded out with a 64.1 after the Seattle game (guessing it was the fumble and INT??)

Gino Smith graded out at 72.7 

 

Your eyes lied to you..Allen was actually outplayed by Smith on Sunday..and by a considerable margin

PFF is just not reliable. Football is too complex of a sport to be measured purely by numbers. There are so many factors and moving parts that I could spend hours explaining. I am old school and go by the eye test which rarely fails me. I knew going into his first few games that Allen was going to be special. I can’t really explain why. His #s were pretty crappy. Contrast that to EJ Manuel who just looked unnatural. 

9 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:

He’s lost a step. 
 

Yep. Allen’s window is closing 🙄

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JohnNord said:


Their ratings are a joke.  I remember last season Tyrel Dodson was consistently ranked in the top 5 LB ratings where Terrel Bernard was somewhere toward the bottom.  It made no sense


It may have influenced Seattle to sign Dotson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need an example of Josh Allen to get butt hurt enough to ignore PFF?   I mean there have been thousands of similar or worse examples.   Also, I view PFF as one metric in and of itself is not super telling.  Kind of like completion percentage.  One qb can have a better completion percentage but that does not make him better than someone with a lower number.   Now PFF is supposed to be a one number thing but it has been shown to not be that forever.  And the numbers tend to get better with more samples. 

Edited by Matt_In_NH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we have to do is create a cage match between Collinsworth and Brady. Brady was all over Josh’s knob like he wanted to marry him. Collinsworth’s BSf says that Josh sucked.

 

Gentlemen, let’s get ready tooo RUUUMMMBBBBLLLLEEEE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheyCallMeAndy said:

Oddly enough, Allen’s QBR for that game was 48.7, which is really bad. 

We did get out to a pretty big lead, which cuts down on the number of "clutch" rated plays. 

 

I do wonder if the two 90+ yard drives contributed to it as those were both get-er-done team efforts.

 

They also dinged him for his fumble [even tho we recovered] and the int.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ToGoGo said:

This is what happens when those in charge of the data don’t understand data. 
 

They’re slaves to KPIs they don’t understand. Where is the adjustment? 


step 1 someone puts together some new metric but likely writes limitations onnthr metric.

 

Step 2 someone else sees it and ignores the limitations then uses it blindly.

 

this is what happened in the housing bubble crash of 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...