Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, starrymessenger said:

I think NE did it to spite us. Seriously the guy blows hot and cold but when on he can get sacks in bunches. Unbelievable trade for KC considering what they gave up and their need for someone to rush the passer. 

Why would trading for him be in spite of us?  Were we trying to land him?

2 hours ago, TFBillsfan said:

The Bills will have the majority of NFL fans rooting for them to beat KC. Otherwise, looking at their schedule, I’m not sure anyone else beats them in the regular season. I don’t see Pitt having the fire power to keep up with them. 

Other than their loss to us, I think Denver will take them out week 18 in Denver.  Pittsburgh also has a solid chance.  Might be the 2 best defenses in the league to end the season.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Pittsburgh also has a solid chance.  Might be the 2 best defenses in the league to end the season.  

 

The only problem is that by then both Watt and Cam Heyward will be hurt.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, NewEra said:

Why would trading for him be in spite of us?  Were we trying to land him?

No, not to my knowledge. It was not meant to be taken seriously, not even as speculation. The idea was that NE would send KC what they need (and for virtually no return) to better KC's chances against us, "us" being a division rival. I should say though I am surprised they would just give away somebody who can rush the passer. Sure he was probably unhappy not getting many opportunities to show his stuff on the Pats in a year where he needs to impress but for nothing?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, starrymessenger said:

No, not to my knowledge. It was not meant to be taken seriously, not even as speculation. The idea was that NE would send KC what they need (and for virtually no return) to better KC's chances against us, "us" being a division rival. I should say though I am surprised they would just give away somebody who can rush the passer. Sure he was probably unhappy not getting many opportunities to show his stuff on the Pats in a year where he needs to impress but for nothing?

Makes sense now 👍🏻 

Posted
3 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Teams like Tennessee and New England aren't competing. They don't care who is offering. It's not like they're worried about KC beating them in the Playoffs.

 

Also isn't KC's front office built on the NE model by Scott Pioli et al? Coaching trees are a thing, but so are front office trees.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Apparently the Bills weren’t interested? No reason to take KC’s 66th rounder. Didn’t want to trade in the division maybe ? Seems like a cheap way to add a player at a need position. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Apparently the Bills weren’t interested? No reason to take KC’s 66th rounder. Didn’t want to trade in the division maybe ? Seems like a cheap way to add a player at a need position. 

 

We don't need another situational pass rusher. We have like 3 of those, and yes I'm including Von in that mix. The one position I want Beane to add is a big DT.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, That's No Moon said:

It's not a hard and fast rule. Women named Chastity for example. The universe could have a sense of irony though.


OR… during my first week at the U, so looong ago,young lady introduces yourself as:

 

”Virginia. That’s virgin for short, but not for long!” 😜

Posted

The Chiefs are going all-in to try for the unprecedented threepeat.  Right now I think any team in the NFCN except probably the Bears could beat them, but in the AFC at least UFN the Chiefs are the team to beat.

 

The Chiefs are giving up quite a few future draft picks to get players who won't help much going forward, or even be on the team at all.  They'll pay for that over the next two years, while the Bills continue to reach another peak.  Sometime between 2024, 2025, and 2026, it's all going to come together for the Bills.  (Hey, maybe all three years, right?  Maybe it's the Bills who get the threepeat.)

Posted
On 10/28/2024 at 1:49 PM, ToGoGo said:

It tells me the Chiefs don’t think they’re good enough as is to win this year. 
 

What you guys see as a strength I see as a sign of nervousness from them. 

They are undefeated…

Posted
On 10/28/2024 at 11:42 PM, Utah John said:

The Chiefs are going all-in to try for the unprecedented threepeat.  Right now I think any team in the NFCN except probably the Bears could beat them, but in the AFC at least UFN the Chiefs are the team to beat.

 

The Chiefs are giving up quite a few future draft picks to get players who won't help much going forward, or even be on the team at all.  They'll pay for that over the next two years, while the Bills continue to reach another peak.  Sometime between 2024, 2025, and 2026, it's all going to come together for the Bills.  (Hey, maybe all three years, right?  Maybe it's the Bills who get the threepeat.)

The Chiefs have given up a 2025 5th round pick and a 2026 6th round pick.  The Bills gave up a 2025 3rd round pick.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Billl said:

The Chiefs have given up a 2025 5th round pick and a 2026 6th round pick.  The Bills gave up a 2025 3rd round pick.  

The Chiefs also gave up a lot more money that will hurt their cap space next year.

  • Haha (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...