Jump to content

Week 8 - Bills @ Seahawks - 1st half game thread


BuffaloBill

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Danger Mouse said:

it's weird but josh looks a lot more like himself today. i prefer interception josh!

 

There's really never been anything wrong with 3 TD / 2INT Josh. You can live with the turnovers if they consistently come with 3 TD's. 0 INT's doesn't get your team any points on the score board. 

 

What's better? 3 TD's and 2 INT's? or 1TD and 0 INT's? Most of the time I much rather have the 3 TD's on the board. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Not at the table Karlos said:

Can’t come back towards own endzone. By the rules it was correct.

 

I get that, but I think that call was outside the spirit of the rule.

He wasn't facing the LOS and he didn't try the murder the guy.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

It is the Bills defensive mantra. Never give it up and make them play one more play. Anything can happen. Played three tough downs to get them into 4th and goal from the 3. Then they got a bit of luck.

They lack blue chip talent at the moment it’s what you have to do schematically 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said:

You must have missed all the drives but one.  Here are their drive.  1 yard 0 yards 94 yards. 0 yards 

 

3 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

Outside of that single drive (where they worked over Williams an Spector) Seattle's had drives of 0 yrds, 1 yrd and 2 yrds.

That's it.

 

2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

They have had one drive. The second goal to go stand was setup inside the 5 by the INT and the Bills stopped them then too.

 

I actually missed the first drive.

 

What I meant was they have not demonstated the ability to stop the Seahawks passing attack.

 

Our biggest advantage in this game is that we can run the ball.

 

Also, the Seahawks kind of stopped themselves too?

 

I wouldn't give the Bills D much credit.

 

 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, VW82 said:

Ok so before someone tries to claim this is all somehow Amari's impact playing through doubles and getting everyone open, he's hardly been involved. Shakir, Kincaid, Colemen, and Cook are still our top guys. 

People are open now, unlike before he got there. He's definitely has an impact. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sierra Foothills said:

 

 

 

I actually missed the first drive.

 

What I meant was they have not demonstated the ability to stop the Seahawks passing attack.

 

Our biggest advantage in this game is that we can run the ball.

 

Also, the Seahawks kind of stopped themselves too?

 

I wouldn't give the Bills D much credit.

 

 

 

The Bills have forced two three and outs and a four and out. Sure the 4th down play inside the 5 was a horrible mistake by Seattle but the Bills had held on 3 downs before that.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sierra Foothills said:

 

 

 

I actually missed the first drive.

 

What I meant was they have not demonstated the ability to stop the Seahawks passing attack.

 

Our biggest advantage in this game is that we can run the ball.

 

Also, the Seahawks kind of stopped themselves too?

 

I wouldn't give the Bills D much credit.

 

 

 

The secondary has played well and teh DLine has been stout.

We do have problems at LB though; it's going to be really hard to hide both of them in the 2nd half :ph34r:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

 

 

I actually missed the first drive.

 

What I meant was they have not demonstated the ability to stop the Seahawks passing attack.

 

Our biggest advantage in this game is that we can run the ball.

 

Also, the Seahawks kind of stopped themselves too?

 

I wouldn't give the Bills D much credit.

 

 

They have 95 yards total

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Simon said:

 

I get that, but I think that call was outside the spirit of the rule.

He wasn't facing the LOS and he didn't try the murder the guy.

He definitely stopped and came back towards their end zone. The rule is parallel or back towards endzone. If he had open hands and pushed instead of forcefully hitting the defender they allow it if I’m reading the rule right. But the way it happened was absolutely a penalty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...