Trump on Rogan 10/25

[The Frankish Reich]

1 hour ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Was any of that supposed to be clever, edgy, or funny?

Oh, it was good.

You're hurting, buddy.
I'll lay off for now. Don't want that Colonial Penn to kick in just yet.

[Biden is Mentally Fit]

Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

Oh, it was good.

You're hurting, buddy.
I'll lay off for now. Don't want that Colonial Penn to kick in just yet.

Uproarious. Exceedingly well done on your part. Kudos good fellow. 

[SCBills]

 

[Roundybout]

Apparently Harris DID offer to appear on the show and offered Tuesday but it didn’t work for Rogan.

[B-Man]

4 hours ago, Roundybout said:

Apparently Harris DID offer to appear on the show and offered Tuesday but it didn’t work for Rogan.

 

Kamala Harris made demands of the Joe Rogan Show before she would go on which included Rogan going TO HER, and the interview that is normally three hours, would only be one hour.

 

You just can't make this level of privilege and idiocy up. 

 

Welp, Rogan turned her demands down ... as he should have.

 

Adding insult to injury, JD Vance has agreed to go on the show FOR THREE HOURS and IN AUSTIN.

 

Woof, could Kamala look any worse at this point? Well, yes she could.

 

 

"They offered a date for Tuesday, but I would have had to travel to her and they only wanted to do an hour.  I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin," Rogan said on X.

"My sincere wish is to just have a nice conversation and get to know her as a human being. I really hope we can make it happen."

 

 

 

https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/10/29/just-in-jd-vance-makes-kamala-harris-look-even-weaker-plans-to-record-full-joe-rogan-show-in-austin-n2402960

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

4 hours ago, Roundybout said:

Apparently Harris DID offer to appear on the show and offered Tuesday but it didn’t work for Rogan.

Based on her terms why would it?

[K D]

I think Rogan is playing with fire if he gives in to any of their demands. Make her do a 3 hour show at the facility like EVERY OTHER GUEST EVER. Why would he change just for her and then offer to just "get to know her as a person" without asking what we all want to know?

- why did you let in so many illegals

- why did you change your position on every policy

- when did you know Joe was senile and why didn't you say anything 

- can you explain in detail your economic policy

[B-Man]

 

 

It's a little more than "Tuesday didn't work for him"  

 

 

 

 

 

 

[The Frankish Reich]

34 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

It's a little more than "Tuesday didn't work for him"  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nice comment by Rogan.

But really - one week till the election and he demands 3 hours? And Mt. Kamala must come to Mohammed?

[SCBills]

Extremely smart decision by the Trump campaign to have JD Vance go on Rogan this week. 
 

Harris wanted Rogan to fly to her and do a one hour interview.   So pathetic. 
 

Either do Rogan’s podcast or don’t…

 

Now JD Vance will go on there… and he’s way more impressive than Trump… and that will be displayed to a massive audience that may or may not otherwise see him in a long form format. 
 

 

Edited 13 hours ago by SCBills

[B-Man]

1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Nice comment by Rogan.

But really - one week till the election and he demands 3 hours? And Mt. Kamala must come to Mohammed?

 

 

LOL.

 

She must do the same thing President Trump (and every other guest)  did ??

 

How unfair.

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

38 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

LOL.

 

She must do the same thing President Trump (and every other guest)  did ??

 

How unfair.

 

I listened to the interview over the past couple days.  I'm not a huge fan of listening to canned answers at debates, and the problem in media circles is the tendency toward sound bite management to sway the way people think.  I wasn't planning on listening but was doing some work around the house and I can only listen to so much 70s/80s classic rock.  

 

This format works very well for Trump, and I thought Rogan did a good job asking questions, allowing Trump to answer, and trying to keep him on track.  I got the feeling he was trying to avoid any appearance of endorsing Trump, or disavowing Harris.  Rogan was quite clear on his feelings about the government being weaponized against Trump, the media supporting that generally, and rhetoric that lead to the two assassination attempts.  

 

I'd think if reasonable people listened to the podcast, they take away an opinion quite different than that portrayed 24/7/365 by the mainstream press. 

[ScotSHO]

8 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I listened to the interview over the past couple days.  I'm not a huge fan of listening to canned answers at debates, and the problem in media circles is the tendency toward sound bite management to sway the way people think.  I wasn't planning on listening but was doing some work around the house and I can only listen to so much 70s/80s classic rock.  

 

This format works very well for Trump, and I thought Rogan did a good job asking questions, allowing Trump to answer, and trying to keep him on track.  I got the feeling he was trying to avoid any appearance of endorsing Trump, or disavowing Harris.  Rogan was quite clear on his feelings about the government being weaponized against Trump, the media supporting that generally, and rhetoric that lead to the two assassination attempts.  

 

I'd think if reasonable people listened to the podcast, they take away an opinion quite different than that portrayed 24/7/365 by the mainstream press. 

 

And that is why the left leaning people on here are mostly silent.  Harris shouldn't go on Rogan, it would be a misstep for her and her fake image.  The silence is telling.

[The Frankish Reich]

18 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I listened to the interview over the past couple days.  I'm not a huge fan of listening to canned answers at debates, and the problem in media circles is the tendency toward sound bite management to sway the way people think.  I wasn't planning on listening but was doing some work around the house and I can only listen to so much 70s/80s classic rock.  

 

This format works very well for Trump, and I thought Rogan did a good job asking questions, allowing Trump to answer, and trying to keep him on track.  I got the feeling he was trying to avoid any appearance of endorsing Trump, or disavowing Harris.  Rogan was quite clear on his feelings about the government being weaponized against Trump, the media supporting that generally, and rhetoric that lead to the two assassination attempts.  

 

I'd think if reasonable people listened to the podcast, they take away an opinion quite different than that portrayed 24/7/365 by the mainstream press. 

I listened to parts of it, and yes, I thought Rogan was fair and that Trump comes off much better in that kind of quiet one-on-one format than he does with an in-person audience.

But I also thought that other than "my 4 years was better than her 4 years" and "I have a secret plan to make everything better" (Ukraine, etc.) there really is nothing there policy-wise.

[Biden is Mentally Fit]

4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

there really is nothing there policy-wise.

As you have stated in defense of your candidate - it can all be found in the party platform. 

[The Frankish Reich]

Just now, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

As you have stated in defense of your candidate - it can all be found in the party platform. 

I forgot about Project 2025

[K D]

6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I listened to parts of it, and yes, I thought Rogan was fair and that Trump comes off much better in that kind of quiet one-on-one format than he does with an in-person audience.

But I also thought that other than "my 4 years was better than her 4 years" and "I have a secret plan to make everything better" (Ukraine, etc.) there really is nothing there policy-wise.

The fact remains he has nothing to hide. He will do these open ended shows all day every day. Kamala can only do short interviews that are pre planned with the questions already agreed to. Who is more fit to run the country? Putin or Xi isn't going to let her stick to 20 min talks with a teleprompter 

[ScotSHO]

10 minutes ago, K D said:

The fact remains he has nothing to hide. He will do these open ended shows all day every day. Kamala can only do short interviews that are pre planned with the questions already agreed to. Who is more fit to run the country? Putin or Xi isn't going to let her stick to 20 min talks with a teleprompter 

Actually, they do get away with it.  Do you think any president besides Trump in the modern NFL era has talked one on one with a rival leader?  It's all handshakes and pictures, the stakes are too high to expose themselves beyond a 30 second clip.  The underlings to the Sec. of State do all the policy talks.

 

And the reason they do it is Trump - linger too long and they'll catch you dumping fish food and undermine the entire purpose of the meeting.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

34 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I listened to parts of it, and yes, I thought Rogan was fair and that Trump comes off much better in that kind of quiet one-on-one format than he does with an in-person audience.

But I also thought that other than "my 4 years was better than her 4 years" and "I have a secret plan to make everything better" (Ukraine, etc.) there really is nothing there policy-wise.

And that’s the thing Frank—I don’t ever feel like I hear grand policy design in any of these formats, but especially during debates.  🤷‍♂️

[The Frankish Reich]

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

And that’s the thing Frank—I don’t ever feel like I hear grand policy design in any of these formats, but especially during debates.  🤷‍♂️

I don't so much need policy. As a starting point, other than foreign policy the President shouldn't really even be making policy. 

But I do like clear answers to straightforward questions. Trump ducked those from Rogan even when Rogan politely pressed a bit. Yes, Kamala does the same thing. But Trump is the guy who's supposed to be breaking the standard politician mold, isn't he?