Jump to content

Who are we Deporting?


K D

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

25-40% of farm laborers

19% of building maintenance and grounds crew

17% of construction workers 

12% of food prep/service workers 

$10.6 billion in tax revenues

 

I wonder how that would affect the economy…

That's a lot of jobs.  How many Americans are unemployed.  

I9 checks?

1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

colored people

The iron law of projection again.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It doesn't work that way. Overall prices can't rise absent an increase in the money supply. 

 

 


This is false.
 

Demand outstripping supply increases prices without any changes in the money supply. 

 

Creating labor shortages across multiple sectors will reduce supply in those industries. Barring a coincidental equal decrease in demand, prices for those goods and services will rise. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:


This is false.
 

Demand outstripping supply increases prices without any changes in the money supply. 

 

Creating labor shortages across multiple sectors will reduce supply in those industries. Barring a coincidental equal decrease in demand, prices for those goods and services will rise. 

Wages would rise.  Organically. 

 

Or are all those illegals on the books and making legal wages? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your message is approved by government censors.

 

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


This is false.
 

Demand outstripping supply increases prices without any changes in the money supply. 

 

Creating labor shortages across multiple sectors will reduce supply in those industries. Barring a coincidental equal decrease in demand, prices for those goods and services will rise. 

It is not false. If prices of some goods rise then you can purchase a smaller amount of goods and services absent any increase in income or money supply.

 

If there are 2 goods in the economy A and B and both cost 10 units of currency and your income is 100 units of currency you can buy a quantity of A and B equal to a quantity of 10 items. If the price of A goes from 10 to 20 and the price of B remains at 10 you can now only buy 5 units of A or 10 units of B. Or some combination equal to 100 units of currency.

 

Your faced with a choice of cutting your consumption of A or B or both. This is what Americans are experiencing especially lower and fixed income consumers. The only way you can maintain the same level of consumption is to increase income or money supply.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Your message is approved by government censors.

 

It is not false. If prices of some goods rise then you can purchase a smaller amount of goods and services absent any increase in income or money supply.

 

If there are 2 goods in the economy A and B and both cost 10 units of currency and your income is 100 units of currency you can buy a quantity of A and B equal to a quantity of 10 items. If the price of A goes from 10 to 20 and the price of B remains at 10 you can now only buy 5 units of A or 10 units of B. Or some combination equal to 100 units of currency.

 

Your faced with a choice of cutting your consumption of A or B or both. This is what Americans are experiencing especially lower and fixed income consumers. The only way you can maintain the same level of consumption is to increase income or money supply.

 

What happens to the price of food if you reduce the supply of food by 25-40% but keep the supply of money the same?

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Westside said:

The deplorables that voted for heals up harris. 

Mostly Catholics are the targets 

1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said:

Wages would rise.  Organically. 

 

Or are all those illegals on the books and making legal wages? 

 Whose wages? Architects? 

 

How about plumbers? They will make more because it will be harder to find a skilled one? 

 

 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

25-40% of farm laborers

19% of building maintenance and grounds crew

17% of construction workers 

12% of food prep/service workers 

$10.6 billion in tax revenues

 

I wonder how that would affect the economy…

He doesn’t care.  He’s too busy talking about Arnold Palmer’s ***** and getting some McDonald’s university fry pin in front of hurricane rubble.  Assuming he actually goes through with it—which I doubt, even if he’s elected, because he’ll probably get distracted by things such as the aforementioned *****—the Kool Aid cult will just blame it on weather machines, or Democrats, or Ukraine, or Antifa, etc.

3 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


This is false.
 

Demand outstripping supply increases prices without any changes in the money supply. 

 

Creating labor shortages across multiple sectors will reduce supply in those industries. Barring a coincidental equal decrease in demand, prices for those goods and services will rise. 

Tommy Eyerolls apparently missed the lesson about supply and demand in high school. 

2 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

 

What happens to the price of food if you reduce the supply of food by 25-40% but keep the supply of money the same?

Tommy Eyerolls will just go to McDonalds and get some fries with the Don, of course.  Let them eat fries, they say!

  • Vomit 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

He doesn’t care.  He’s too busy talking about Arnold Palmer’s ***** and getting some McDonald’s university fry pin in front of hurricane rubble.  Assuming he actually goes through with it—which I doubt, even if he’s elected, because he’ll probably get distracted by things such as the aforementioned *****—the Kool Aid cult will just blame it on weather machines, or Democrats, or Ukraine, or Antifa, etc.

Look at you throw up all over your keyboard. Nice!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Look at you throw up all over your keyboard. Nice!

Hoax.  But good on you from taking a break from listening to Cats and Barbara Streisand and from thinking about Arnold Palmer’s man meat to share with us.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

Hoax.  But good on you from taking a break from listening to Cats and Barbara Streisand and from thinking about Arnold Palmer’s man meat to share with us.  

And you're still throwing up, must be painful.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...